IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i8p2252-d222821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changing Coal Mining Brownfields into Green Infrastructure Based on Ecological Potential Assessment in Xuzhou, Eastern China

Author

Listed:
  • Shanshan Feng

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China)

  • Wei Hou

    (Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100830, China)

  • Jiang Chang

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

It is widely recognized that brownfield regeneration to green space is a sustainable form of urban development. However, it is essential to choose those brownfields that have the greatest potential to be integrated into urban green infrastructure (GI). This paper addresses how to quantitatively assess the ecological potential of coal mining brownfields at the city level, and looks at how these brownfields can be best adapted to enhance the GI system. Taking Xuzhou as an example, an ecological potential assessment method for brownfield regeneration to green space is established considering both its ecological importance and the capacity of maintaining GI connectivity. The results show that more than half of the coal mining brownfields have relatively higher ecological importance values, and only four patches play an important role in maintaining GI connectivity. The final ecological potential values of brownfield regeneration to green space are obtained by overlaying the values of ecological importance and the capacity values of maintaining GI connectivity. Then, all the brownfields are divided into five groups according to their ecological potential values, which are significantly different in each group. Around 51.35% of the brownfields have a high or very high potential for restoration to GI, which are distributed in the southeastern part of the western mining area and the central part of the eastern mining area. The presented method can assist reclamation scientists and urban planners in decision making based on quantitative analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Shanshan Feng & Wei Hou & Jiang Chang, 2019. "Changing Coal Mining Brownfields into Green Infrastructure Based on Ecological Potential Assessment in Xuzhou, Eastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2252-:d:222821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2252/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2252/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher De Sousa, 2004. "The greening of brownfields in American cities," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 579-600.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanli Chen & Yu Zhang & Ningxin Zhang & Man Zhou & Heping Ding, 2022. "Analysis on the Spatial Effect of Infrastructure Development on the Real Estate Price in the Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Maria Bostenaru Dan & Magdalena Maria Bostenaru-Dan, 2021. "Greening the Brownfields of Thermal Power Plants in Rural Areas, an Example from Romania, Set in the Context of Developments in the Industrialized Country of Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Cun Zhang & Xiaojie Wang & Shangxin Fang & Xutao Shi, 2022. "Construction and Application of VR-AR Teaching System in Coal-Based Energy Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Shanshan Feng & Jiake Shen & Shuo Sheng & Zengqing Hu & Yuncai Wang, 2023. "Spatial Prioritizing Brownfields Catering for Green Infrastructure by Integrating Urban Demands and Site Attributes in a Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-29, April.
    5. Jarosław Kaczmarek, 2022. "The Balance of Outlays and Effects of Restructuring Hard Coal Mining Companies in Terms of Energy Policy of Poland PEP 2040," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-30, March.
    6. Song, Yang & Lyu, Yang & Qian, Sitong & Zhang, Xinjia & Lin, Huiying & Wang, Shijun, 2022. "Identifying urban candidate brownfield sites using multi-source data: The case of Changchun City, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Yao, ZHOU & Jiang, CHANG & Shan-shan, FENG, 2022. "Effects of urban growth boundaries on urban spatial structural and ecological functional optimization in the Jining Metropolitan Area, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeffrey Zabel, 2007. "The Impact of Imperfect Information on the Transactions of Contaminated Properties," NCEE Working Paper Series 200703, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Jan 2007.
    2. Anna Alberini & Dennis Guignet, 2008. "Voluntary Cleanups and Redevelopment Potential: Lessons from Baltimore, Maryland," Working Papers 2008.87, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    3. Dai, Bing & Gu, Xiaokun & Xie, Boming, 2020. "Policy Framework and Mechanism of Life Cycle Management of Industrial Land (LCMIL) in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Santos, Georgina & Behrendt, Hannah & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2010. "Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 46-91.
    5. Paolo Rosato & Anna Alberini & Valentina Zanatta & Margaretha Breil, 2010. "Redeveloping derelict and underused historic city areas: evidence from a survey of real estate developers," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 257-281.
    6. Christopher A. De Sousa & Changshan Wu & Lynne M. Westphal, 2009. "Assessing the Effect of Publicly Assisted Brownfield Redevelopment on Surrounding Property Values," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 23(2), pages 95-110, May.
    7. Andrzej Długoński & Diana Dushkova, 2021. "The Hidden Potential of Informal Urban Greenspace: An Example of Two Former Landfills in Post-Socialist Cities (Central Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Yu-Ting Tang & C. Paul Nathanail, 2012. "Sticks and Stones: The Impact of the Definitions of Brownfield in Policies on Socio-Economic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(5), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Adam Eckerd & Andrew Keeler, 2012. "Going green together? Brownfield remediation and environmental justice," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(4), pages 293-314, December.
    10. Alberto Longo & Danny Campbell, 2017. "The Determinants of Brownfields Redevelopment in England," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(2), pages 261-283, June.
    11. Iwona Kantor-Pietraga & Aleksandra Zdyrko & Jakub Bednarczyk, 2021. "Semi-Natural Areas on Post-Mining Brownfields as an Opportunity to Strengthen the Attractiveness of a Small Town. An Example of Radzionków in Southern Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Joaquin Ameller & Jean-Daniel Rinaudo & Corinne Merly, 2020. "The contribution of economic science to brownfield redevelopment: a review," Post-Print hal-02532209, HAL.
    13. Evangelos Asprogerakas & Kiki Mountanea, 2020. "Spatial strategies as a place branding tool in the region of Ruhr," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 336-347, December.
    14. Rachel Johansen & Zachary Neal & Stephen Gasteyer, 2015. "The view from a broken window: How residents make sense of neighbourhood disorder in Flint," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(16), pages 3054-3069, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2252-:d:222821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.