Author
Listed:
- Cankun Li
(School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Building Energy Saving and Construct Technology, Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Restoration of Mining Region, Department of Natural Resources of Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221116, China)
- Jiang Chang
(Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Restoration of Mining Region, Department of Natural Resources of Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221116, China
School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)
- Shanshan Feng
(Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Restoration of Mining Region, Department of Natural Resources of Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221116, China
School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)
- Shiyuan Zhou
(Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Restoration of Mining Region, Department of Natural Resources of Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221116, China
School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)
Abstract
The increasing development of coal mining subsidence wetland parks has led to a growing focus on assessing their ecological, economic, and social benefits following ecological restoration. This study establishes an assessment framework for the social landscape performance of coal mining subsidence wetland parks based on the landscape performance series (LPS), cultural ecosystem services (CES), and the unique characteristics of coal mining subsidence wetland parks. The framework integrates expert opinions and field research to select indicators, resulting in a comprehensive evaluation system comprising 28 indicators across five dimensions. Taking the Pan’an Lake National Wetland Park (PLNWP) in Xuzhou, China, as an example, we conducted empirical research by collecting data through questionnaires and on-site interviews. Using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the social landscape performance score of PLNWP was 3.511, which is rated as “good.” The importance–performance analysis (IPA) was applied to identify differences in the perceptions of visitors and local residents regarding the social landscape performance of the PLNWP. Local residents highlighted the need to enhance the amenity of waterside spaces, while visitors focused on the accessibility. Finally, based on the performance score and the perceptions from different stakeholders, optimization strategies were proposed in four aspects: enhancing waterside space amenity, optimizing accessibility, improving educational facilities, and addressing diverse user needs. This study could provide a feasible assessment framework and optimization guidance for other coal mining subsidence wetland parks.
Suggested Citation
Cankun Li & Jiang Chang & Shanshan Feng & Shiyuan Zhou, 2025.
"From a Coal Mining Area to a Wetland Park: How Is the Social Landscape Performance in Pan’an Lake National Wetland Park?,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1305-:d:1682437
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1305-:d:1682437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.