IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i6p1305-d1682437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From a Coal Mining Area to a Wetland Park: How Is the Social Landscape Performance in Pan’an Lake National Wetland Park?

Author

Listed:
  • Cankun Li

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Building Energy Saving and Construct Technology, Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Restoration of Mining Region, Department of Natural Resources of Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Jiang Chang

    (Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Restoration of Mining Region, Department of Natural Resources of Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221116, China
    School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Shanshan Feng

    (Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Restoration of Mining Region, Department of Natural Resources of Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221116, China
    School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Shiyuan Zhou

    (Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Restoration of Mining Region, Department of Natural Resources of Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221116, China
    School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

The increasing development of coal mining subsidence wetland parks has led to a growing focus on assessing their ecological, economic, and social benefits following ecological restoration. This study establishes an assessment framework for the social landscape performance of coal mining subsidence wetland parks based on the landscape performance series (LPS), cultural ecosystem services (CES), and the unique characteristics of coal mining subsidence wetland parks. The framework integrates expert opinions and field research to select indicators, resulting in a comprehensive evaluation system comprising 28 indicators across five dimensions. Taking the Pan’an Lake National Wetland Park (PLNWP) in Xuzhou, China, as an example, we conducted empirical research by collecting data through questionnaires and on-site interviews. Using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the social landscape performance score of PLNWP was 3.511, which is rated as “good.” The importance–performance analysis (IPA) was applied to identify differences in the perceptions of visitors and local residents regarding the social landscape performance of the PLNWP. Local residents highlighted the need to enhance the amenity of waterside spaces, while visitors focused on the accessibility. Finally, based on the performance score and the perceptions from different stakeholders, optimization strategies were proposed in four aspects: enhancing waterside space amenity, optimizing accessibility, improving educational facilities, and addressing diverse user needs. This study could provide a feasible assessment framework and optimization guidance for other coal mining subsidence wetland parks.

Suggested Citation

  • Cankun Li & Jiang Chang & Shanshan Feng & Shiyuan Zhou, 2025. "From a Coal Mining Area to a Wetland Park: How Is the Social Landscape Performance in Pan’an Lake National Wetland Park?," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1305-:d:1682437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1305/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1305/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peer von Döhren & Dagmar Haase, 2023. "Ecosystem Services for Planning Post-Mining Landscapes Using the DPSIR Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Zixuan Li & Jiang Chang & Cheng Li & Sihao Gu, 2023. "Ecological Restoration and Protection of National Land Space in Coal Resource-Based Cities from the Perspective of Ecological Security Pattern: A Case Study in Huaibei City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, February.
    3. Yang Chen & Zhenqi Hu & Pengyu Li & Gensheng Li & Dongzhu Yuan & Jiaxin Guo, 2022. "Assessment and Effect of Mining Subsidence on Farmland in Coal–Crop Overlapped Areas: A Case of Shandong Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Szu-Ju Wu & Eric Ng & Kai-Bo Lin & Yi-Hsin Cheng & Ben A. LePage & Wei-Ta Fang, 2023. "Influence of Landscape Preference and Place Attachment on Responsible Environmental Behavior—A Study of Taipei’s Guandu Nature Park Wetlands, Taiwan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Xiaomin Xiao & Qiaoru Ye & Xiaobin Dong, 2024. "Using Importance–Performance Analysis to Reveal Priorities for Multifunctional Landscape Optimization in Urban Parks," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Zhen Wang & Bo Yang & Shujuan Li & Chris Binder, 2016. "Economic Benefits: Metrics and Methods for Landscape Performance Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-12, April.
    7. Shanshan Feng & Wei Hou & Jiang Chang, 2019. "Changing Coal Mining Brownfields into Green Infrastructure Based on Ecological Potential Assessment in Xuzhou, Eastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Laijian Wang & Lachun Wang & Pengcheng Yin & Haiyang Cui & Longwu Liang & Zhenbo Wang, 2017. "Value Assessment of Artificial Wetland Derived from Mining Subsided Lake: A Case Study of Jiuli Lake Wetland in Xuzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Conesa, Hector M. & Schulin, Rainer & Nowack, Bernd, 2008. "Mining landscape: A cultural tourist opportunity or an environmental problem: The study case of the Cartagena-La Union Mining District (SE Spain)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 690-700, February.
    10. Shamik Chakraborty & Ram Avtar & Raveena Raj & Huynh Vuong Thu Minh, 2019. "Village Level Provisioning Ecosystem Services and Their Values to Local Communities in the Peri-Urban Areas of Manila, The Philippines," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Jiani Zhang & Xun Zhu & Ming Gao, 2022. "The Relationship between Habitat Diversity and Tourists’ Visual Preference in Urban Wetland Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cankun Li & Jiang Chang & Shiyuan Zhou & Shanshan Feng, 2025. "Ecosystem Health Assessment of Coal Mining Subsidence Wetlands Using the DPSIR Model: A Case Study in Yingshang County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Longsheng Huang & Yi Tang & Youtao Song & Jinghui Liu & Hua Shen & Yi Du, 2024. "Identifying and Optimizing the Ecological Security Pattern of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration from 2000 to 2030," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Suranjan Sinha & Surajit Chakraborty & Shatrajit Goswami, 2017. "Ecological footprint: an indicator of environmental sustainability of a surface coal mine," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 807-824, June.
    4. Yaping Zhang & Jianjun Zhang & Yufei Li & Sen Liang & Wei Chen & Yixin Dai, 2024. "Revealing the Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Obstacles of Ecological Security in the Xiamen-Zhangzhou-Quanzhou Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Shuangyan Guo & Shan Yang & Canjiao Liu, 2024. "Mining Heritage Reuse Risks: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Kolejka Jaromír & Klimánek Martin & Martinát Stanislav & Ruda Aleš, 2013. "Delineation of post-industrial landscapes of the Upper Silesian corridor in the Basin of Ostrava," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 1(3), pages 21-34, September.
    7. Maria Bostenaru Dan & Magdalena Maria Bostenaru-Dan, 2021. "Greening the Brownfields of Thermal Power Plants in Rural Areas, an Example from Romania, Set in the Context of Developments in the Industrialized Country of Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Jasmina Grzinic & Patricia Zanketic & Robert Bacac, 2009. "Industrial Tourism In Istria," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 18(2), pages 211-232, december.
    9. Rodolfo Sapiains & Herman Elgueta & Pía Francisca Ríos & Marcelo Miño, 2025. "Strengthening Environmental Conservation: The Role of Connectedness to Nature and Place Attachment in Intentions to Protect Urban Wetlands in Punta Arenas, Chilean Patagonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Shan Yang & Shengyuan Zhuo & Zitong Xu & Jianhong Chen, 2023. "Risk Assessment of Mining Heritage Reuse in Public–Private-Partnership Mode Based on Improved Matter–Element Extension Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Ya Shao & Qinxue Xu & Xi Wei, 2023. "Progress of Mine Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration Research Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Cun Zhang & Xiaojie Wang & Shangxin Fang & Xutao Shi, 2022. "Construction and Application of VR-AR Teaching System in Coal-Based Energy Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Loïc Lévi & Jean Jacques Nowak & Sylvain Petit & Hakim Hammadou, 2022. "Industrial legacy and hotel pricing: An application of spatial hedonic pricing analysis in Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(4), pages 870-898, June.
    14. Beiling Chen & Jianhua Zhu & Huayan Liu & Lixiong Zeng & Fuhua Li & Zhiyan Xiao & Wenfa Xiao, 2024. "Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Ecosystem Services in the Wuhan Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, October.
    15. Pierre Levasseur & Katrin Erdlenbruch & Christelle Gramaglia, 2019. "Why do people continue to live near polluted sites? Empirical evidence from Southwestern Europe," CEE-M Working Papers hal-02277633, CEE-M, Universtiy of Montpellier, CNRS, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro.
    16. Devenin, Veronica & Bianchi, Constanza, 2019. "Characterizing a mining space: Analysis from case studies in Chile and Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Tiezheng Zhao & Yang Zhao & Ming-Han Li, 2019. "Landscape Performance for Coordinated Development of Rural Communities & Small-Towns Based on “Ecological Priority and All-Area Integrated Development”: Six Case Studies in East China’s Zhejiang Provi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Song, Yang & Lyu, Yang & Qian, Sitong & Zhang, Xinjia & Lin, Huiying & Wang, Shijun, 2022. "Identifying urban candidate brownfield sites using multi-source data: The case of Changchun City, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    19. Guanyu Chen & Jacky Bowring & Shannon Davis, 2023. "Exploring the Terminology, Definitions, and Forms of Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) in Landscape Architecture," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-41, April.
    20. Qiaoyin Zhang & Yan Wu & Zhiqiang Zhao, 2024. "Identification of Harbin Ecological Function Degradation Areas Based on Ecological Importance Assessment and Ecological Sensitivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1305-:d:1682437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.