IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1755-d1506736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Ecosystem Services in the Wuhan Metropolitan Area

Author

Listed:
  • Beiling Chen

    (Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Jianhua Zhu

    (Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China
    Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    Scientific and Technological Collaborative Innovation Centre for the Yangtze River Economic Belt Ecological Conservation, Beijing 100091, China
    Forestry and Grassland Carbon Sink Research Institute, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Huayan Liu

    (Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Lixiong Zeng

    (Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China
    Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    Scientific and Technological Collaborative Innovation Centre for the Yangtze River Economic Belt Ecological Conservation, Beijing 100091, China
    Forestry and Grassland Carbon Sink Research Institute, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Fuhua Li

    (Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Zhiyan Xiao

    (Wuhan Forestry Station, Wuhan Garden and Forestry Bureau, Wuhan 430023, China)

  • Wenfa Xiao

    (Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China
    Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    Scientific and Technological Collaborative Innovation Centre for the Yangtze River Economic Belt Ecological Conservation, Beijing 100091, China
    Forestry and Grassland Carbon Sink Research Institute, Beijing 100091, China)

Abstract

Rapid urbanization has affected ecosystem stability, and the construction of ecological security patterns (ESPs) can rationally allocate resources and achieve ecological protection. Priority evaluation of critical areas can maximize the benefits of ecological protection, which is crucial for sustainable urban development. However, most prior studies have focused on assessing individual elements of the ESP, rarely considering both the protection priority of ecological sources and corridors. We constructed ESPs for the Wuhan Metropolitan Area (WMA) from 2000 to 2020 and evaluated the priority of ecological sources and corridors for protection. The findings indicated that high-level ecological sources exhibited higher overall landscape connectivity and ecosystem service values with lower patch fragmentation. The average area proportions of primary, secondary, and tertiary ecological sources in 2000, 2010, and 2020 were 41.11%, 23.03%, and 29.86%, respectively. High-level ecological corridors had shorter lengths and offered higher comprehensive ecosystem service values. The total length of secondary corridors exceeded that of primary corridors by 1951.19 km, 650.39 km, and 2238.18 km in 2000, 2010, and 2020, respectively. Primary corridors, which connected fragmented and isolated sources, should have their ecological land percentage increased to enhance connectivity. Secondary corridors connected two independent and distant sources, providing the basis for ecological protection in the intervening area, whose surrounding habitats should be protected. This study identifies the ecological protection priority and offers a theoretical basis and practical reference for balancing urban development with ecological protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Beiling Chen & Jianhua Zhu & Huayan Liu & Lixiong Zeng & Fuhua Li & Zhiyan Xiao & Wenfa Xiao, 2024. "Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Ecosystem Services in the Wuhan Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1755-:d:1506736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1755/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1755/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zixuan Li & Jiang Chang & Cheng Li & Sihao Gu, 2023. "Ecological Restoration and Protection of National Land Space in Coal Resource-Based Cities from the Perspective of Ecological Security Pattern: A Case Study in Huaibei City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, February.
    2. Sharma, Rozi & Malaviya, Piyush, 2023. "Ecosystem services and climate action from a circular bioeconomy perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Schirpke, Uta & Meisch, Claude & Marsoner, Thomas & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2018. "Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of outdoor recreation in the European Alps and their surroundings," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 336-350.
    4. Zhang, Zimo & Peng, Jian & Xu, Zihan & Wang, Xiaoyu & Meersmans, Jeroen, 2021. "Ecosystem services supply and demand response to urbanization: A case study of the Pearl River Delta, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Shuoshuo & Liu, Yaobin & Wei, Guoen & Bi, Mo & He, Bao-Jie, 2024. "Carbon surplus or carbon deficit under land use transformation in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Longsheng Huang & Yi Tang & Youtao Song & Jinghui Liu & Hua Shen & Yi Du, 2024. "Identifying and Optimizing the Ecological Security Pattern of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration from 2000 to 2030," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Wei Shui & Kexin Wu & Yong Du & Haifeng Yang, 2021. "The Trade-Offs between Supply and Demand Dynamics of Ecosystem Services in the Bay Areas of Metropolitan Regions: A Case Study in Quanzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Fuquan Zhao & Fanlong Bai & Xinglong Liu & Zongwei Liu, 2022. "A Review on Renewable Energy Transition under China’s Carbon Neutrality Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.
    5. Huber, Lisa & Schirpke, Uta & Marsoner, Thomas & Tasser, Erich & Leitinger, Georg, 2020. "Does socioeconomic diversification enhance multifunctionality of mountain landscapes?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    6. Richards, Daniel Rex & Lavorel, Sandra, 2022. "Integrating social media data and machine learning to analyse scenarios of landscape appreciation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    7. Yujiang Yan & Jiangui Li & Junli Li & Teng Jiang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Changes in the Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services in the Kaidu-Kongque River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Yan Wu & Yingmei Wu & Chen Li & Binpin Gao & Kejun Zheng & Mengjiao Wang & Yuhong Deng & Xin Fan, 2022. "Spatial Relationships and Impact Effects between Urbanization and Ecosystem Health in Urban Agglomerations along the Belt and Road: A Case Study of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Kubiszewski, Ida & Concollato, Luke & Costanza, Robert & Stern, David I., 2023. "Changes in authorship, networks, and research topics in ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    10. Barrios Latorre, Sergio Alejandro & Aronsson, Helena & Björnsson, Lovisa & Viketoft, Maria & Prade, Thomas, 2024. "Exploring the benefits of intermediate crops: Is it possible to offset soil organic carbon losses caused by crop residue removal?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    11. Lavorel, Sandra & Rey, Pierre-Louis & Grigulis, Karl & Zawada, Mégane & Byczek, Coline, 2020. "Interactions between outdoor recreation and iconic terrestrial vertebrates in two French alpine national parks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    12. Yunzi Yang & Yangyi Wu & Hongzan Jiao, 2025. "Assessing Urban Park Equity in China Through Supply and Demand Balance: A Case Study of Wuhan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Hongye Li & Yutian Hu & Hao Li & Jinjie Ren & Rujie Shao & Zhicheng Liu, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urbanization on Carbon Storage in the Mega-Urban Agglomeration Area: Case Study of Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Sicheng Wang & Pingjun Sun & Feng Sun & Shengnan Jiang & Zhaomin Zhang & Guoen Wei, 2021. "The Direct and Spillover Effect of Multi-Dimensional Urbanization on PM 2.5 Concentrations: A Case Study from the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Uta Schirpke & Lukas Egarter Vigl & Erich Tasser & Ulrike Tappeiner, 2019. "Analyzing Spatial Congruencies and Mismatches between Supply, Demand and Flow of Ecosystem Services and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Claude Meisch & Uta Schirpke & Lisa Huber & Johannes Rüdisser & Ulrike Tappeiner, 2019. "Assessing Freshwater Provision and Consumption in the Alpine Space Applying the Ecosystem Service Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Havinga, Ilan & Bogaart, Patrick W. & Hein, Lars & Tuia, Devis, 2020. "Defining and spatially modelling cultural ecosystem services using crowdsourced data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    18. Lingua, Federico & Coops, Nicholas C. & Griess, Verena C., 2022. "Valuing cultural ecosystem services combining deep learning and benefit transfer approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    19. Song Liu & Peiyu Shen & Yishan Huang & Li Jiang & Yongjiu Feng, 2022. "Spatial Distribution Changes in Nature-Based Recreation Service Supply from 2008 to 2018 in Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Robert Huber & Robert Finger, 2020. "A Meta‐analysis of the Willingness to Pay for Cultural Services from Grasslands in Europe," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 357-383, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1755-:d:1506736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.