IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7627-d414254.html

Abandoned Places and Urban Marginalized Sites in Lugoj Municipality, Three Decades after Romania’s State-Socialist Collapse

Author

Listed:
  • Ioan Sebastian Jucu

    (Department of Geography, Faculty of Chemistry, Biology, Geography, West University of Timișoara, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

  • Sorina Voiculescu

    (Department of Geography, Faculty of Chemistry, Biology, Geography, West University of Timișoara, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

Abstract

The postsocialist process of urban restructuring came with important spatial, social, and economic consequences. This triggered important transformations that remain palpable in the everyday texture of urban life, spatial patterns, and even the internal structures of the city. Every urban settlement was bound to contribute to the state socialist industry so that postsocialist urban transformations also included multiple aspects of dereliction and ruination of the socialist industrial assets. Threatening postsocialist urban formations and sustainability, the most common feature is collective neglect at national, regional, and local scales. The transition from state-socialist forms of production to the current market-based system poses many difficulties. This article specifically investigates the problems of urban industrial ruins in Lugoj—which are typical for medium-sized postsocialist municipalities in Romania. The research draws on qualitative data gathered by the authors through semi-structured interviews, personal communication, and oral histories and continuous infield observation (2012–2019). The findings unveil the production and the reproduction of abandoned spaces in Romanian urban settlements in the absence of specific regeneration programs and policies on urban redevelopment and marginalized areas. The analysis reveals that urban ruins harm the quality of life in local communities, damaging both the urban landscape and local sustainability. Further actions for local urban regeneration are urgently needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioan Sebastian Jucu & Sorina Voiculescu, 2020. "Abandoned Places and Urban Marginalized Sites in Lugoj Municipality, Three Decades after Romania’s State-Socialist Collapse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7627-:d:414254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7627/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7627/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aurora Castro Teixeira & Maria João Barros, 2014. "Local municipalities’ involvement in promoting the internationalisation of SMEs," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(1-2), pages 141-162, February.
    2. Alice Mah, 2010. "Memory, Uncertainty and Industrial Ruination: Walker Riverside, Newcastle upon Tyne," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 398-413, June.
    3. Xuefei Ren, 2014. "The Political Economy of Urban Ruins: Redeveloping Shanghai," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1081-1091, May.
    4. Szymon Marcińczak & Michael Gentile & Samuel Rufat & Liviu Chelcea, 2014. "Urban Geographies of Hesitant Transition: Tracing Socioeconomic Segregation in Post-Ceauşescu Bucharest," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1399-1417, July.
    5. Anna-Liisa Unt & Penny Travlou & Simon Bell, 2014. "Blank Space: Exploring the Sublime Qualities of Urban Wilderness at the Former Fishing Harbour in Tallinn, Estonia," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 267-286, June.
    6. Daryl Martin, 2014. "Introduction: Towards a Political Understanding of New Ruins," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1037-1046, May.
    7. Gil M Doron, 2000. "The Dead Zone and the Architecture of Transgression," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 247-263.
    8. Ravit Hananel, 2014. "Can centralization, decentralization and welfare go together? The case of Massachusetts Affordable Housing Policy (Ch. 40B)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(12), pages 2487-2502, September.
    9. Daryl Martin, 2014. "Translating Space: the Politics of Ruins, the Remote and Peripheral Places," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1102-1119, May.
    10. Neil Brenner & Nik Theodore, 2005. "Neoliberalism and the urban condition," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 101-107, April.
    11. Tim Strangleman, 2014. "Alice Mah 2012 : Industrial Ruination, Community, and Place: Landscapes and Legacies of Urban Decline . Toronto : University of Toronto Press ," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1126-1127, May.
    12. Marius Lupșa Matichescu & Alexandru Dragan & Daniel Lucheș, 2017. "Channels to West: Exploring the Migration Routes between Romania and France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Nadeem & Amer Aziz & Muhammad Ahmad Al-Rashid & Giovanni Tesoriere & Muhammad Asim & Tiziana Campisi, 2021. "Scaling the Potential of Compact City Development: The Case of Lahore, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Yali Li & Ni Yan & Haifan Cheng & Jing Luo & Zhengxu Zhou, 2024. "Hesitant or determined? The influence of social and environmental factors on settlement decision-making of rural in-migrants: evidence from Dali, China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Wun-Jheng Wu & Pei-Ing Wu & Je-Liang Liou, 2021. "Boon or Bane: Effect of Adjacent YIMBY or NIMBY Facilities on the Benefit Evaluation of Open Spaces or Cropland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Rafał Blazy & Hanna Hrehorowicz-Gaber & Alicja Hrehorowicz-Nowak, 2021. "Adaptation of Post-Industrial Areas as Hydrological Windows to Improve the City’s Microclimate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Xuewen Zhou & Xiaoxia Zhang & Zhimei Dai & Roosmayri Lovina Hermaputi & Chen Hua & Yonghua Li, 2021. "Spatial Layout and Coupling of Urban Cultural Relics: Analyzing Historical Sites and Commercial Facilities in District III of Shaoxing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Ioan Sebastian JUCU, 2022. "When Service-Led Activities and Tertiarization Processes Replace Old Industries and Local Brownfields: Changes, Perceptions and Perspectives in the Northern Industrial Area of Lugoj, Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daryl Martin, 2014. "Introduction: Towards a Political Understanding of New Ruins," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1037-1046, May.
    2. Martin J. Murray, 2021. "Ruination and Rejuvenation: Rethinking Growth and Decline through an Inverted Telescope," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 348-362, March.
    3. Rachel Friedman & Gillad Rosen, 2020. "The face of affordable housing in a neoliberal paradigm," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 959-975, April.
    4. Fan Wu & Ling-Hin Li & Sue Yurim Han, 2018. "Social Sustainability and Redevelopment of Urban Villages in China: A Case Study of Guangzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Galina Ševčenko-Kozlovska & Kristina Čižiūnienė, 2022. "A Study of the Relationship between Lithuanian International Migration Flows and Transport Sector Performance Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    6. repec:osf:socarx:3mj8c_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Jan Lilliendahl Larsen & Jens Brandt, 2018. "Critique, Creativity and the Co-Optation of the Urban: A Case of Blind Fields and Vague Spaces in Lefebvre, Copenhagen and Current Perceptions of the Urban," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 52-69.
    8. Sophie Yarker, 2018. "Tangential attachments: Towards a more nuanced understanding of the impacts of cultural urban regeneration on local identities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3421-3436, November.
    9. Belotti, Alice, 2016. "Estate regeneration and community impacts: challenges and lessons for social landlords, developers and local councils," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121480, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Jan Lilliendahl Larsen & Jens Brandt, 2018. "Critique, Creativity and the Co-Optation of the Urban: A Case of Blind Fields and Vague Spaces in Lefebvre, Copenhagen and Current Perceptions of the Urban," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 52-69.
    11. Joe Crawford & Kim Mckee & Sharon Leahy, 2020. "The Right to Rent: Active Resistance to Evolving Geographies of State Regulation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 415-428, May.
    12. Pablo Arboleda, 2017. "‘Ruins of Modernity’: The Critical Implications of Unfinished Public Works in Italy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 804-820, September.
    13. Liu Yang & Koen H. van Dam & Lufeng Zhang, 2020. "Developing Goals and Indicators for the Design of Sustainable and Integrated Transport Infrastructure and Urban Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-34, November.
    14. Minseo Kim & Christoph D. D. Rupprecht & Katsunori Furuya, 2018. "Residents’ Perception of Informal Green Space—A Case Study of Ichikawa City, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Fox ZY Hu, 2015. "Industrial capitalisation and spatial transformation in Chinese cities: Strategic repositioning, state-owned enterprise capitalisation, and the reproduction of urban space in Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(15), pages 2799-2821, November.
    16. Maja de Neergaard & Mia Arp Fallov & Rikke Skovgaard Nielsen & Anja Jørgensen, 2020. "Contexts and Interconnections: A Conjunctural Approach to Territorial Cohesion," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 277-286.
    17. Ioan Sebastian JUCU, 2022. "When Service-Led Activities and Tertiarization Processes Replace Old Industries and Local Brownfields: Changes, Perceptions and Perspectives in the Northern Industrial Area of Lugoj, Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Enikő Vincze, 2024. "RESIDUALIZED PUBLIC HOUSING IN ROMANIA: Peripheralization of ‘the Social’ and the Racialization of ‘Unhouseables’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 403-421, May.
    19. Mikael Klintman & Anna Jonsson & Maria Grafström & Petra Torgilsson, 2025. "Academia and society in collaborative knowledge production towards urban sustainability: several schemes—three common crossroads," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 20519-20538, September.
    20. Benoit, Cecilia & Zadoroznyj, Maria & Hallgrimsdottir, Helga & Treloar, Adrienne & Taylor, Kara, 2010. "Medical dominance and neoliberalisation in maternal care provision: The evidence from Canada and Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 475-481, August.
    21. Natacha Aveline-Dubach, 2017. "Embedment of “Liquid” Capital into the Built Environment:," Post-Print halshs-01563507, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7627-:d:414254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.