IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v45y2008i12p2407-2428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From London to Mumbai and Back Again: Gentrification and Public Policy in Comparative Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Harris

    (Department of Geography, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK, andrew.harris@ucl.ac.uk)

Abstract

Gentrification has become a global phenomenon over the past 15 years and has been understood as an increasingly important strategy within neo-liberal policy-making. Focusing on London and Mumbai, this paper details how public policies and planning regimes have been reconfigured and rescaled to facilitate and encourage new property speculation. However, against more generalised and abstract accounts of the neo-liberal city, the paper uses its comparative perspective to emphasise the geographically and historically specific manifestations and effects of gentrification processes. By highlighting different forms of state intervention and sharper socio-spatial impacts in Mumbai, the paper challenges the Eurocentric framing of a global spread of gentrification and argues that Mumbai can act as an important source of learning for gentrification research.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Harris, 2008. "From London to Mumbai and Back Again: Gentrification and Public Policy in Comparative Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2407-2428, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:45:y:2008:i:12:p:2407-2428
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098008097100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098008097100
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098008097100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tom Slater, 2004. "North American Gentrification? Revanchist and Emancipatory Perspectives Explored," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(7), pages 1191-1213, July.
    2. Liza Weinstein, 2008. "Mumbai's Development Mafias: Globalization, Organized Crime and Land Development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 22-39, March.
    3. G A Jones & A Varley, 1999. "The Reconquest of the Historic Centre: Urban Conservation and Gentrification in Puebla, Mexico," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(9), pages 1547-1566, September.
    4. Jason Hackworth & Neil Smith, 2001. "The changing state of gentrification," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 92(4), pages 464-477, November.
    5. Rowland Atkinson, 2003. "Introduction: Misunderstood Saviour or Vengeful Wrecker? The Many Meanings and Problems of Gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2343-2350, November.
    6. Tom Slater, 2006. "The Eviction of Critical Perspectives from Gentrification Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 737-757, December.
    7. Daniel Graham & Nigel Spence, 1995. "Contemporary Deindustrialisation and Tertiarisation in the London Economy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(6), pages 885-911, June.
    8. Donald Mcneill, 2002. "Livingstone's London: Left Politics and the World City," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 75-80.
    9. Andy Thornley, 1998. "original: Institutional change and London`s urban policy agenda," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 32(1), pages 163-183.
    10. Neil Brenner & Nik Theodore, 2005. "Neoliberalism and the urban condition," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 101-107, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jennifer Robinson, 2011. "Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Loretta Lees, 2011. "Gentrifying the World City," Chapters, in: Ben Derudder & Michael Hoyler & Peter J. Taylor & Frank Witlox (ed.), International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities, chapter 33, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. David Ley & Sin Yih Teo, 2014. "Gentrification in Hong Kong? Epistemology vs. Ontology," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1286-1303, July.
    4. Jennifer Robinson, 2016. "Comparative Urbanism: New Geographies and Cultures of Theorizing the Urban," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 187-199, January.
    5. Arnoud Lagendijk & Rianne Melik & Freek Haan & Huib Ernste & Huub Ploegmakers & Serap Kayasu, 2014. "Comparative Approaches to Gentrification: A Research Framework," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(3), pages 358-365, July.
    6. Michael Janoschka & Jorge Sequera & Luis Salinas, 2014. "Gentrification in Spain and Latin America — a Critical Dialogue," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1234-1265, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geoffrey DeVerteuil, 2011. "Evidence of Gentrification-induced Displacement among Social Services in London and Los Angeles," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(8), pages 1563-1580, June.
    2. Thomas Sigler & David Wachsmuth, 2016. "Transnational gentrification: Globalisation and neighbourhood change in Panama’s Casco Antiguo," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(4), pages 705-722, March.
    3. Matthias Bernt, 2012. "The ‘Double Movements’ of Neighbourhood Change: Gentrification and Public Policy in Harlem and Prenzlauer Berg," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(14), pages 3045-3062, November.
    4. Kevin Ward & Colette Fagan & Linda McDowell & Diane Perrons & Kathryn Ray, 2010. "Class Transformation and Work-Life Balance in Urban Britain: The Case of Manchester," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 2259-2278, October.
    5. Tim Butler, 2007. "Re‐urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification, Suburbanization or New Urbanism?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 759-781, December.
    6. Ingmar Pastak & Eneli Kindsiko & Tiit Tammaru & Reinout Kleinhans & Maarten Van Ham, 2019. "Commercial Gentrification in Post‐Industrial Neighbourhoods: A Dynamic View From an Entrepreneur’s Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 110(5), pages 588-604, December.
    7. Loretta Lees, 2003. "Super-gentrification: The Case of Brooklyn Heights, New York City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2487-2509, November.
    8. Lance Freeman, 2009. "Neighbourhood Diversity, Metropolitan Segregation and Gentrification: What Are the Links in the US?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(10), pages 2079-2101, September.
    9. Mark Davidson, 2008. "Spoiled Mixture: Where Does State-led `Positive' Gentrification End?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2385-2405, November.
    10. Lance Freeman, 2008. "Comment on ‘The Eviction of Critical Perspectives from Gentrification Research’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 186-191, March.
    11. Mathieu Van Criekingen, 2009. "Moving In/Out of Brussels' Historical Core in the Early 2000s: Migration and the Effects of Gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(4), pages 825-848, April.
    12. Carl Grodach & Nicole Foster & James Murdoch, 2018. "Gentrification, displacement and the arts: Untangling the relationship between arts industries and place change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(4), pages 807-825, March.
    13. Rosemary D.F. Bromley & Peter K. Mackie, 2009. "Displacement and the New Spaces for Informal Trade in the Latin American City Centre," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(7), pages 1485-1506, June.
    14. Mark Davidson, 2011. "Critical Commentary. Gentrification in Crisis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(10), pages 1987-1996, August.
    15. Loretta Lees & David Ley, 2008. "Introduction to Special Issue on Gentrification and Public Policy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2379-2384, November.
    16. Cuz Potter & Danielle Labbé, 2021. "Gentrification or …? Injustice in large-scale residential projects in Hanoi," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(12), pages 2456-2472, September.
    17. Charlotte Lemanski, 2014. "Hybrid gentrification in South Africa: Theorising across southern and northern cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(14), pages 2943-2960, November.
    18. Darren P Smith & Tim Butler, 2007. "Conceptualising the Sociospatial Diversity of Gentrification: ‘To Boldly Go’ into Contemporary Gentrified Spaces, the ‘Final Frontier’?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(1), pages 2-9, January.
    19. Kate S. Shaw & Iris W. Hagemans, 2015. "‘Gentrification Without Displacement' and the Consequent Loss of Place: The Effects of Class Transition on Low-income Residents of Secure Housing in Gentrifying Areas," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 323-341, March.
    20. Kathe Newman & Elvin K. Wyly, 2006. "The Right to Stay Put, Revisited: Gentrification and Resistance to Displacement in New York City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(1), pages 23-57, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:45:y:2008:i:12:p:2407-2428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.