IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p605-d1611487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dramatic Decoupling Between Population and Construction Land in Rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiatong Han

    (Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Minghong Tan

    (Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

The rural population in China is experiencing a rapid decline, yet rural construction land (RCL) continues to exhibit an upward trend. The vast number and widespread distribution of villages have hindered the establishment of a unified understanding of per capita RCL and its evolving characteristics in China. This study uses both per capita RCL and a decoupling index as indicators to investigate the decoupling relationship between RCL and the rural population in China and examines their variations across national, provincial, and prefectural levels, utilizing more precise data from national land surveys and censuses. The findings reveal that China’s per capita RCL displays considerable regional disparities, having increased by 53.0% from 2010 to 2020. More than 80% of prefecture-level cities show a strong negative decoupling relationship between RCL and the rural population. Additionally, the results demonstrate that per capita RCL is influenced by various factors, including terrain, latitude, and urbanization rates. Notably, the per capita income of rural residents shows no significant effect on the per capita RCL. These research findings can serve as a valuable reference for understanding the current status of per capita RCL in China and provide a reference for RCL planning in the developing world.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiatong Han & Minghong Tan, 2025. "Dramatic Decoupling Between Population and Construction Land in Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:605-:d:1611487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/605/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/605/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deng, Xiangzheng & Huang, Jikun & Rozelle, Scott & Uchida, Emi, 2008. "Growth, population and industrialization, and urban land expansion of China," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 96-115, January.
    2. Shi, Linna & Wang, Yongsheng, 2021. "Evolution characteristics and driving factors of negative decoupled rural residential land and resident population in the Yellow River Basin," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haiwen Zhou, 2013. "The Choice of Technology and Rural-Urban Migration in Economic Development," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 8(3), pages 337-361, September.
    2. Dai, Jiangyu & Wu, Shiqiang & Han, Guoyi & Weinberg, Josh & Xie, Xinghua & Wu, Xiufeng & Song, Xingqiang & Jia, Benyou & Xue, Wanyun & Yang, Qianqian, 2018. "Water-energy nexus: A review of methods and tools for macro-assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 393-408.
    3. Xu, Tingting & Gao, Jay & Li, Yuhua, 2019. "Machine learning-assisted evaluation of land use policies and plans in a rapidly urbanizing district in Chongqing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Long, Fenjie & Zheng, Longfei & Song, Zhida, 2018. "High-speed rail and urban expansion: An empirical study using a time series of nighttime light satellite data in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 106-118.
    5. Borice Augustin Ngounou & Honoré Tekam Oumbe & Bruno Emmanuel Ongo Nkoa & Edmond Noubissi Domguia, 2024. "Inclusive growth in the face of increasing urbanization: What experience for African countries?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 34-70, February.
    6. Shasha Lu & Xingliang Guan & Chao He & Jiali Zhang, 2014. "Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Policy Implications of Urban Land Expansion in Metropolitan Areas: A Case Study of Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-26, July.
    7. Poelhekke, Steven, 2011. "Urban growth and uninsured rural risk: Booming towns in bust times," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 461-475, November.
    8. Ke Huang & Martin Dallimer & Lindsay C. Stringer & Anlu Zhang & Ting Zhang, 2021. "Does Economic Agglomeration Lead to Efficient Rural to Urban Land Conversion? An Examination of China’s Metropolitan Area Development Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Wu, Rong & Li, Yingcheng & Wang, Shaojian, 2022. "Will the construction of high-speed rail accelerate urban land expansion? Evidences from Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. William C. Strange, 2009. "Viewpoint: Agglomeration research in the age of disaggregation," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 42(1), pages 1-27, February.
    11. Zhang, Yumei & Diao, Xinshen, 2020. "The changing role of agriculture with economic structural change – The case of China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    12. Zhao, Zhe & Bai, Yuping & Wang, Guofeng & Chen, Jiancheng & Yu, Jiangli & Liu, Wei, 2018. "Land eco-efficiency for new-type urbanization in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 19-26.
    13. Jinfeng Wang & Xuhua Liu & Hongyan Chen, 2011. "Construction of a Cities Evolution Tree, with Applications," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1360, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Li, Zhihui & Deng, Xiangzheng & Yin, Fang & Yang, Cuiyuan, 2015. "Analysis of climate and land use changes impacts on land degradation in the North China Plain," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-11.
    15. Jiamin Ren & Chenrouyu Zheng & Fuyou Guo & Hongbo Zhao & Shuang Ma & Yu Cheng, 2022. "Spatial Differentiation of Digital Rural Development and Influencing Factors in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Rui Wang, 2011. "Environmental and resource sustainability of Chinese cities: A review of issues, policies, practices and effects," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(2), pages 112-121, May.
    17. Heying Li & Jianchen Zhang & Yamin Shan & Guangxia Wang & Qin Tian & Jiayao Wang & Huiling Ma, 2024. "Study on Spatial Distribution Dispersion Evaluation and Driving Forces of Rural Settlements in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Jipeng Zhang & Jianyong Fan & Jiawei Mo, 2017. "Government Intervention, Land Market, And Urban Development: Evidence From Chinese Cities," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(1), pages 115-136, January.
    19. Joseph DeSalvo & Qing Su, 2017. "Determinants of Urban Sprawl: A Panel Data Approach," Working Papers 0217, University of South Florida, Department of Economics.
    20. Silvia Beghelli & Gianni Guastella & Stefano Pareglio, 2020. "Governance fragmentation and urban spatial expansion: Evidence from Europe and the United States [Governance-Fragmentierung und urbane räumliche Expansion: Erkenntnisse aus Europa und den USA]," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 40(1), pages 13-32, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:605-:d:1611487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.