IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p564-d1607863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Ecosystem Service Values of Urban Green Space Systems in Suzhou City Based on the Extreme Gradient Boosting Geographically Weighted Regression Method: Spatiotemporal Changes, Driving Factors, and Influencing Mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Tailong Shi

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, School of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Hao Xu

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, School of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Urban green space systems (UGSS) play a crucial role in enhancing citizens’ well-being and promoting sustainable urban development through their ecosystem service values (ESV). However, understanding the spatiotemporal changes, driving factors, and influencing mechanisms of ESV remains a critical challenge for advancing urban green theories and formulating effective policies. This study focuses on Suzhou, China’s third-largest prefecture-level city by economic volume and ecological core city of the Taihu watershed, to evaluate the ESV of its UGSS from 2010 to 2020, identify key driving factors, and analyze their influencing mechanisms. Using the InVEST model combined with the entropy weight method (EWM), we assessed the ESV changes over the study period. To examine the influencing mechanisms, we employed an innovative XGBoost-GWR approach, where XGBoost was used to screen globally significant factors from 37 potential drivers, and geographically weighted regression (GWR) was applied to model local spatial heterogeneity, providing a research perspective that balances global nonlinear relationships with local spatial heterogeneity. The results revealed three key findings: First, while Suzhou’s UGSS ESV increased by 9.92% from 2010 to 2020, the Global Moran’s I index rose from 0.325 to 0.489, indicating that its spatial distribution became more uneven, highlighting the increased ecological risks. Second, climate, topography, landscape pattern, and vegetation emerged as the most significant driving factors, with topographic factors showing the greatest variation (the negatively impacted area increased by 455.60 km 2 ) and climate having the largest overall impact but least variation. Third, the influencing mechanisms were primarily driven by land use changes resulting from urbanization and industrialization, leading to increased ecological risks such as soil erosion, pollution, landscape fragmentation, and habitat degradation, particularly in the Kunshan, Wujiang, and Zhangjiagang Districts, where agricultural land has been extensively converted to constructed land. This study not only elucidates the mechanisms influencing UGSS’s ESV driving factors but also expands the theoretical understanding of urbanization’s ecological impacts, providing valuable insights for optimizing UGSS layout and informing sustainable urban planning policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Tailong Shi & Hao Xu, 2025. "Study on Ecosystem Service Values of Urban Green Space Systems in Suzhou City Based on the Extreme Gradient Boosting Geographically Weighted Regression Method: Spatiotemporal Changes, Driving Factors,," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:564-:d:1607863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/564/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/564/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cai, Yimeng & Wu, Jiaxin & Yimiti, Tudi & Li, Zhouyuan & Yang, Xiuchun & Dong, Shikui, 2024. "The landscape altered the interaction between vegetation and climate in the desert oasis of Hotan River Basin, Xinjiang, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 491(C).
    2. Zhang, Zimo & Peng, Jian & Xu, Zihan & Wang, Xiaoyu & Meersmans, Jeroen, 2021. "Ecosystem services supply and demand response to urbanization: A case study of the Pearl River Delta, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    3. Daniel Canaza & Elmer Calizaya & Walter Chambi & Fredy Calizaya & Carmen Mindani & Osmar Cuentas & Cirilo Caira & Walquer Huacani, 2023. "Spatial Distribution of Soil Organic Carbon in Relation to Land Use, Based on the Weighted Overlay Technique in the High Andean Ecosystem of Puno—Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Bakhtiar Feizizadeh & Davoud Omarzadeh & Mohammad Kazemi Garajeh & Tobia Lakes & Thomas Blaschke, 2023. "Machine learning data-driven approaches for land use/cover mapping and trend analysis using Google Earth Engine," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(3), pages 665-697, February.
    5. Xin Li & Jiayue Zhang & Wenna Zhang & Yue Tan, 2024. "Spatial Heterogeneity Analysis of Factors on Commuting Carbon Emissions: Evidence from the Shenzhen Metropolitan Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Junfang Zhao & Jianyong Ma & Meiting Hou & Sen Li, 2020. "Spatial–temporal variations of carbon storage of the global forest ecosystem under future climate change," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 603-624, April.
    7. Ning He & Wenxian Guo & Hongxiang Wang & Long Yu & Siyuan Cheng & Lintong Huang & Xuyang Jiao & Wenxiong Chen & Haotong Zhou, 2023. "Temporal and Spatial Variations in Landscape Habitat Quality under Multiple Land-Use/Land-Cover Scenarios Based on the PLUS-InVEST Model in the Yangtze River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Yuxin Zhu & Dazuo Tian & Feng Yan, 2020. "Effectiveness of Entropy Weight Method in Decision-Making," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-5, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaosi Zhang & Jizhong Shao, 2024. "Evaluation of the Suitability of Street Vending Planning in Urban Public Space in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Aibo Jin & Gachen Zhang & Ping Ma & Xiangrong Wang, 2024. "Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in the Chaohu Lake Basin Based on Land-Use Scenario Simulations," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Li, Shuoshuo & Liu, Yaobin & Wei, Guoen & Bi, Mo & He, Bao-Jie, 2024. "Carbon surplus or carbon deficit under land use transformation in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Xinxin Fu & Xiaofeng Wang & Jitao Zhou & Jiahao Ma, 2021. "Optimizing the Production-Living-Ecological Space for Reducing the Ecosystem Services Deficit," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Chuntian Pan & Jun Wen & Jianing Ma, 2024. "Temporal and Spatial Variation in Habitat Quality in Guangxi Based on PLUS-InVEST Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Zhao, Yingrui & Hu, Songhua & Zhang, Ming, 2024. "Evaluating equitable Transit-Oriented development (TOD) via the Node-Place-People model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    7. Yang Wei & Tetsuo Kidokoro & Fumihiko Seta & Bo Shu, 2024. "Spatial-Temporal Assessment of Urban Resilience to Disasters: A Case Study in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    8. Jie Zhou & Wenyi Liu & Yu Lin & Benyong Wei & Yaohui Liu, 2024. "The Evaluation and Comparison of Resilience for Shelters in Old and New Urban Districts: A Case Study in Kunming City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Wei Shui & Kexin Wu & Yong Du & Haifeng Yang, 2021. "The Trade-Offs between Supply and Demand Dynamics of Ecosystem Services in the Bay Areas of Metropolitan Regions: A Case Study in Quanzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Jiale Zhu & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Yanan Chen & Yijun Liu & Huanan Liu, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Seismic Risk Assessment Based on Combined Weight-TOPSIS Model and CF-Logistic Regression Model—A Case Study of Songyuan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-28, July.
    11. Fuquan Zhao & Fanlong Bai & Xinglong Liu & Zongwei Liu, 2022. "A Review on Renewable Energy Transition under China’s Carbon Neutrality Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.
    12. Yunxiang Ge & Cheng Lu & Han Gao, 2023. "Constructing an Indicator System for Cultural Sustainability in Chinese Cities under the Objective of Urban Renewal and Capability Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    13. Yuhao Jin & Jiajun Guo & Hengkang Zhu, 2024. "Assessing the Interaction Impacts of Multi-Scenario Land Use and Landscape Pattern on Water Ecosystem Services in the Greater Bay Area by Multi-Model Coupling," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, November.
    14. Leticia Citlaly López-Teloxa & Alejandro Ismael Monterroso-Rivas, 2024. "Soil Organic Carbon May Decline Under Climate Change: A Case Study in Mexican Forests," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Tao, Yu & Tao, Qin & Sun, Xiao & Qiu, Jiangxiao & Pueppke, Steven G. & Ou, Weixin & Guo, Jie & Qi, Jiaguo, 2022. "Mapping ecosystem service supply and demand dynamics under rapid urban expansion: A case study in the Yangtze River Delta of China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    16. Sha, Anmeng & Zhang, Jianjun & Pan, Yujie & Zhang, Shouguo, 2025. "How to recognize and measure the impact of phasing urbanization on eco-environment quality: An empirical case study of 19 urban agglomerations in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    17. Roengchai Tansuchat & Sittichok Plaiphum, 2023. "Assessing Food and Livelihood Security in Sea Salt Community: A GIAHS Study in Ban Laem, Phetchaburi, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-29, October.
    18. Wang, Jinsong & Gao, Dongdong & Shi, Wei & Du, Jiayan & Huang, Zhuo & Liu, Buyuan, 2023. "Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service value: Evidence from the economic development of urbanised regions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Xiaohan Yan & Qun Sun, 2023. "How to Evaluate Ecological Civilization Construction and Its Regional Differences: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
    20. Yuguo Lin & Chao He, 2021. "Evaluation of Livelihood Sustainability in the Context of Natural Forest Land Degradation Vulnerability: A Case Study of Five Counties in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:564-:d:1607863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.