IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p524-d1604103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption and Diversity of Agroforestry Systems in the Amazon Biome: A Bibliometric Overview

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Pauletto

    (Institute of Biodiversity and Forests, Federal University of Western Pará, Santarém 68040-255, Pará, Brazil)

  • Marcelo Francia Arco-Verde

    (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA Forests), Curitiba 80230-901, Paraná, Brazil)

  • Ivan Crespo Silva

    (Department of Forest Sciences, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80210-170, Paraná, Brazil)

  • Lucas Sérgio de Sousa Lopes

    (Capitão Poço Campus, Federal Rural University of the Amazon, Capitão Poço 68650-000, Pará, Brazil)

  • Anselmo Junior Correa Araújo

    (Institute of Biodiversity and Forests, Federal University of Western Pará, Santarém 68040-255, Pará, Brazil)

  • Flávia Cristina Araújo Lucas

    (Department of Natural Sciences, Pará State University, Belém 66050-540, Pará, Brazil)

  • Seidel Ferreira dos Santos

    (Department of Natural Sciences, Pará State University, Belém 66050-540, Pará, Brazil)

  • Thiago Almeida Vieira

    (Institute of Biodiversity and Forests, Federal University of Western Pará, Santarém 68040-255, Pará, Brazil)

  • Carlos Tadeu dos Santos Dias

    (Department of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60440-900, Ceará, Brazil)

  • Lucieta Guerreiro Martorano

    (Center for Research and Technology Transfer Support—Middle Amazon, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA Eastern Amazon), Santarém 68020-640, Pará, Brazil)

Abstract

Agroforestry systems (AFSs) exhibit varied composition and dynamics as intrinsic characteristics of their specificities. In this context, a review of the adoption, composition, and dynamics of AFSs in the Amazon biome was conducted to identify the origin, institutions, and researchers of published studies with results on this scientific topic, focused on trends and characteristics of AFSs diversity in the Amazon. The methodology adopted was a scoping review, based on searches in the Scopus and Web of Science databases, using specific keywords to ensure that the articles addressed topics related to the adoption, composition, and dynamics of AFSs in the Amazon. Following the selection of subtopics, 66 articles were selected and analyzed. The analysis revealed that research on AFSs in the Amazon highlights interactions among traditional knowledge, innovations, and sustainability. The analysis of research published between 1996 and 2023 indicated growth in studies with an interdisciplinary focus, primarily from Brazil. However, internationalization, collaborative networks, and funding factors contribute to the prominence of foreign institutions. Research studies often address topics such as species diversity, agrobiodiversity, and tree growth in agroforestry intercrops. In this context, homegarden agroforestry (HAF) emerges as one of the main subjects of study, encompassing multifunctional environments, richness diversity, and ongoing experimentation with plant species. The choice of species for AFSs is influenced by factors such as labor, personal preferences, and market demands, although loggers and commercial forestry systems tend to have lower diversity, contrasting with HAF. AFSs implementation methods vary according to financing, management, and the farmer’s education and gender. Environmental conservation, food security, ecosystem services, and production flexibility are highlighted as benefits of AFSs, while challenges include technical and economic limitations. This research highlights the strengthening and consolidation of AFSs by addressing scientific gaps and demonstrating the need for studies on the adoption, consolidation, and management of these systems, as well as the relationship between diversity and yield. Future research should be concentrated on deepening studies on the relationship between diversity and yield in AFSs, as well as on management strategies that support the consolidation of these systems in the Amazon biome, integrating innovation, public policy support, and traditional knowledge of farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Pauletto & Marcelo Francia Arco-Verde & Ivan Crespo Silva & Lucas Sérgio de Sousa Lopes & Anselmo Junior Correa Araújo & Flávia Cristina Araújo Lucas & Seidel Ferreira dos Santos & Thiago Alme, 2025. "Adoption and Diversity of Agroforestry Systems in the Amazon Biome: A Bibliometric Overview," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:524-:d:1604103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/524/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/524/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan Carlos Suárez Salazar & Marie Ange Ngo Bieng & Luz Marina Melgarejo & Julio A Di Rienzo & Fernando Casanoves, 2018. "First typology of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) systems in Colombian Amazonia, based on tree species richness, canopy structure and light availability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Ntawuruhunga, Donatien & Ngowi, Edwin Estomii & Mangi, Halima Omari & Salanga, Raymond John & Shikuku, Kelvin Mashisia, 2023. "Climate-smart agroforestry systems and practices: A systematic review of what works, what doesn't work, and why," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Kristina Marquardt & Rebecka Milestad & Lennart Salomonsson, 2013. "Improved fallows: a case study of an adaptive response in Amazonian swidden farming systems," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(3), pages 417-428, September.
    4. Daniela Pauletto & Lucieta Guerreiro Martorano & Lucas Sérgio de Sousa Lopes & Michelliny Pinheiro de Matos Bentes & Thiago Almeida Vieira & Thiago Gomes de Sousa Oliveira & Verena Santos de Sousa & Á, 2023. "Plant Composition and Species Use in Agroforestry Homegardens in the Eastern Amazon, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Junwen Zhu & Weishu Liu, 2020. "A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(1), pages 321-335, April.
    6. Smith, Nigel J. H. & Falesi, Italo C. & Alvim, Paulo de T. & Serrao, Emmanuel Adilson S., 1996. "Agroforestry trajectories among smallholders in the Brazilian Amazon: innovation and resiliency in pioneer and older settled areas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 15-27, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ota, Liz & Herbohn, John & Gregorio, Nestor & Harrison, Steve, 2020. "Reforestation and smallholder livelihoods in the humid tropics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Juan F. Prados-Castillo & Miguel Ángel Solano-Sánchez & Pilar Guaita Fernández & José Manuel Guaita Martínez, 2023. "Potential of the Crypto Economy in Financial Management and Fundraising for Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Antonio-José Moreno-Guerrero & María Elena Parra-González & Jesús López-Belmonte & Adrián Segura-Robles, 2022. "Science mapping analysis of “cultural” in web of science (1908–2019)," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 239-257, February.
    4. Dima Jamali & Georges Samara & Lokman I. Meho, 2024. "Determinants of research productivity and efficiency among the Arab world’s accredited business schools," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 2511-2543, December.
    5. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Olegas Beriozovas & Dalia Perkumienė & Mindaugas Škėma & Abdellah Saoualih & Larbi Safaa & Marius Aleinikovas, 2024. "Research Advancement in Forest Property Rights: A Thematic Review over Half a Decade Using Natural Language Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-28, September.
    7. Paola Alzate & Juan F. Mejía-Giraldo & Isabella Jurado & Sara Hernandez & Alexandra Novozhenina, 2024. "Research perspectives on youth social entrepreneurship: strategies, economy, and innovation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Angélica Pigola & Priscila Rezende Costa, 2022. "In search of understanding about knowledge and learning on innovation performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 3995-4022, July.
    9. Brannstrom, Christian, 2001. "Conservation-with-Development Models in Brazil's Agro-Pastoral Landscapes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1345-1359, August.
    10. Wanmei Hu & Zaike Gu & Kangning Xiong & Yaoru Lu & Zuju Li & Min Zhang & Liheng You & Huan Ruan, 2024. "A Review of Value Realization and Rural Revitalization of Eco-Products: Insights for Agroforestry Ecosystem in Karst Desertification Control," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, November.
    11. Paola Clerici Maestosi & Monica Salvia & Filomena Pietrapertosa & Federica Romagnoli & Michela Pirro, 2024. "Implementation of Positive Energy Districts in European Cities: A Systematic Literature Review to Identify the Effective Integration of the Concept into the Existing Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, February.
    12. Gabriela Simonet & Julie Subervie & Driss Ezzine-De-Blas & Marina Cromberg & Amy Duchelle, 2015. "Paying smallholders not to cut down the amazon forest: impact evaluation of a REDD+ pilot project," Working Papers 1514, Chaire Economie du climat.
    13. Hui Li & Weishu Liu, 2020. "Same same but different: self-citations identified through Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2723-2732, September.
    14. Weishu Liu & Meiting Huang & Haifeng Wang, 2021. "Same journal but different numbers of published records indexed in Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection: causes, consequences, and solutions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4541-4550, May.
    15. Ignacio Rodríguez-Rodríguez & José-Víctor Rodríguez & Niloofar Shirvanizadeh & Andrés Ortiz & Domingo-Javier Pardo-Quiles, 2021. "Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Big Data and the Internet of Things to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scientometric Review Using Text Mining," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-29, August.
    16. Rosangela de Araújo Santos & Eduardo Oliveira Teles & Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires, 2024. "Applying the Circular Economy Framework to Blockchain Agricultural Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Nguyen Thi Nha Trang & Thanh-Thuy Nguyen & Hong V. Pham & Thi Thu Anh Cao & Thu Huong Trinh Thi & Javad Shahreki, 2022. "Impacts of Collaborative Partnership on the Performance of Cold Supply Chains of Agriculture and Foods: Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, May.
    18. Dong Liu & Yu Peng Zhu, 2023. "Evolution of Knowledge Structure in an Emerging Field Based on a Triple Helix Model: the Case of Smart Factory," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4583-4607, December.
    19. Virginia Milone & Antonio Fusco & Angelamaria De Feo & Marco Tatullo, 2024. "Clinical Impact of “Real World Data” and Blockchain on Public Health: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-14, January.
    20. Judith Nyulas & Ștefan Dezsi & Adrian-Florin Niță & Zsolt Magyari-Sáska & Marie-Luise Frey & Alpár Horváth, 2025. "Twenty-Five Years of Scientific Production on Geoparks from the Perspective of Bibliometric Analysis Using PRISMA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-30, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:524-:d:1604103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.