IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i3p707-d1331536.html

Implementation of Positive Energy Districts in European Cities: A Systematic Literature Review to Identify the Effective Integration of the Concept into the Existing Energy Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Paola Clerici Maestosi

    (ENEA Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Department of Energy Technologies and Renewable Sources, 40129 Bologna, Italy)

  • Monica Salvia

    (National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis (CNR-IMAA), 85050 Tito Scalo, Italy)

  • Filomena Pietrapertosa

    (National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis (CNR-IMAA), 85050 Tito Scalo, Italy)

  • Federica Romagnoli

    (Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture (PDTA), Sapienza University of Rome, 00196 Rome, Italy)

  • Michela Pirro

    (ENEA Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Department of Energy Technologies and Renewable Sources, 40129 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

The positive energy district (PED) is a rather recent concept that aims to contribute to the main objectives of the Energy Union strategy. It is based on an integrated multi-sectoral approach in response to Europe’s most complex challenges. But to what extent have its development and implementation been supported by research and innovation programs? And what is the state of the art of its implementation and effective penetration into the current energy systems of European cities, according to the evidence provided by the scientific literature? This study aims to investigate these issues, providing a critical overview of the PED situation by means of a systematic literature review based on the use of open-access bibliometric software supplemented with content analysis. The results show that less than half of the documents analyzed refer to actual case studies, 80% of which were funded as part of research projects. This seems to lead to the conclusion that although PEDs have been strongly encouraged by the scientific community and policy initiatives at the European level, their implementation in cities is still limited. Moreover, an uneven distribution among countries can be observed. To overcome the existing barriers to PED diffusion and implementation, it would be useful to provide more ad hoc funding and, above all, facilitate its accessibility also by municipalities not yet well integrated into European projects, initiatives, and networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Paola Clerici Maestosi & Monica Salvia & Filomena Pietrapertosa & Federica Romagnoli & Michela Pirro, 2024. "Implementation of Positive Energy Districts in European Cities: A Systematic Literature Review to Identify the Effective Integration of the Concept into the Existing Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:707-:d:1331536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/707/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/707/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luca Casamassima & Luigi Bottecchia & Axel Bruck & Lukas Kranzl & Reinhard Haas, 2022. "Economic, social, and environmental aspects of Positive Energy Districts—A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(6), November.
    2. Mattia De Rosa & Vincenzo Bianco & Henrik Barth & Patricia Pereira da Silva & Carlos Vargas Salgado & Fabiano Pallonetto, 2023. "Technologies and Strategies to Support Energy Transition in Urban Building and Transportation Sectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Saïd Echchakoui, 2020. "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(3), pages 165-184, September.
    4. Junwen Zhu & Weishu Liu, 2020. "A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(1), pages 321-335, April.
    5. Francisco Zamora-Polo & Jesús Sánchez-Martín & Mario Corrales-Serrano & Luis Espejo-Antúnez, 2019. "What Do University Students Know about Sustainable Development Goals? A Realistic Approach to the Reception of this UN Program Amongst the Youth Population," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiziana Ferrante & Paola Clerici Maestosi & Teresa Villani & Federica Romagnoli, 2025. "A Portfolio of Building Solutions Supporting Positive Energy District Transition: Assessing the Impact of Green Building Certifications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-23, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dušan Nikolić & Dragan Ivanović & Lidija Ivanović, 2024. "An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4573-4595, July.
    2. Valentina Della Corte & Giovanna Del Gaudio & Fabiana Sepe & Simone Luongo, 2021. "Destination Resilience and Innovation for Advanced Sustainable Tourism Management: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Büşra Ayan & Elif Güner & Semen Son-Turan, 2022. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-39, December.
    4. Andrea Caputo & Mariya Kargina, 2022. "A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 82-88, March.
    5. Sabando-Vera, David & Montalván-Burbano, Néstor & Parrales-Guerrero, Katherine & Yonfá-Medranda, Marcela & Plaza-Úbeda, José Antonio, 2025. "Growing a greener future: A bibliometric analysis of green innovation in SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    6. Nimesh P. Bhojak & Shakti B. Dodiya & Ashish Mathur & Mohammadali K. Momin & Sureshbhai N. Patel, 2024. "Willingness to Pay for Community-based Health Insurance: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Factors Influencing Participation and Implications for Healthcare Financing," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 13(3), pages 321-339, December.
    7. Esra Şahin & Vedat Yiğitoğlu & Zuhal Gök Demir & Çiğdem Karakaya & Fulya Erendağ Sümer & Beysun Güneri, 2024. "Circular Economy for Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis for the Tourism/Hospitality Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Yang, Kun & Zou, Ruiwen & Zhang, Wei & Zeng, Xiding & Li, Zhangyu & Guo, Jiahong, 2025. "Comprehensive review of Positive Energy Districts: Multidimensional analysis of energy, economic, social, and environmental aspects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    9. Monica Martinez-Blasco & Francesc Prior Sanz & Francesc Martori Adrian, 2025. "Mapping innovation tools and financial inclusion: a bibliometric analysis," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-36, December.
    10. Filippi, Emilia & Bannò, Mariasole & Trento, Sandro, 2023. "Automation technologies and their impact on employment: A review, synthesis and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    11. Tripathy, Prajukta & Jena, Pabitra Kumar & Mishra, Bikash Ranjan, 2024. "Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    12. Abdollah Mohammadparst Tabas & Mohsin Abdur Rehman & Fatima Khitous & Andrea Urbinati, 2025. "Stakeholder and customer engagement in circular economy ecosystems: A systematic literature review and research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 402-416, January.
    13. Juan F. Prados-Castillo & Miguel Ángel Solano-Sánchez & Pilar Guaita Fernández & José Manuel Guaita Martínez, 2023. "Potential of the Crypto Economy in Financial Management and Fundraising for Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Antonio-José Moreno-Guerrero & María Elena Parra-González & Jesús López-Belmonte & Adrián Segura-Robles, 2022. "Science mapping analysis of “cultural” in web of science (1908–2019)," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 239-257, February.
    15. Dima Jamali & Georges Samara & Lokman I. Meho, 2024. "Determinants of research productivity and efficiency among the Arab world’s accredited business schools," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 2511-2543, December.
    16. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    17. Olegas Beriozovas & Dalia Perkumienė & Mindaugas Škėma & Abdellah Saoualih & Larbi Safaa & Marius Aleinikovas, 2024. "Research Advancement in Forest Property Rights: A Thematic Review over Half a Decade Using Natural Language Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-28, September.
    18. Gaurav Mitra & Vandana Gupta & Gaurav Gupta, 2025. "A systematic literature review on the determinants of corporate governance for firm performance: evidence from India," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 941-990, December.
    19. Bach Quang Ho & Yuki Inoue, 2020. "Driving Network Externalities in Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Paola Alzate & Juan F. Mejía-Giraldo & Isabella Jurado & Sara Hernandez & Alexandra Novozhenina, 2024. "Research perspectives on youth social entrepreneurship: strategies, economy, and innovation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:707-:d:1331536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.