IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i10p2035-d1769560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Well-Being in Old Residential Areas: How Health-Promoting Environments Influence Resident Sentiment Within the 15-Minute Living Circle

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaying Zhao

    (School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
    Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy)

  • Yang Chen

    (School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Jiaping Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Green Building in Western China, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Pierluigi Salvadeo

    (Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy)

Abstract

Building healthy communities is crucial for creating healthy cities and improving residents’ well-being. Old residential areas, with their substantial stock and elevated health risks, require urgent environmental upgrades. However, the relationship between community health promotion factors and resident sentiment, a crucial indicator of subjective well-being, in old residential areas remains poorly understood. By integrating big data-based community health promotion factors and Weibo data within the 15-min living circle of old residential areas in Xi’an, we developed an XGBoost model and employed SHAP analyses to interpret predictive outcomes. Results show that healthy facilities were dominant influencing factors in old residential areas. Densities of parking, supermarkets, education, package stations, and scenic spots exhibit nonlinear relationships with positive sentiment, indicating clear threshold effects and saturation effects. Two dominant patterns were observed in interactions between dominant factors and their strongest interacting factors. Four environment–sentiment patterns were identified for targeted planning interventions. It is recommended that planners and policymakers account for density phases and synergistic combinations of the dominant factors to optimize community health within old residential areas. The findings offer empirical support and planning insights for fostering healthy, sentiment-sensitive retrofit in old residential areas within the 15-min living circle.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaying Zhao & Yang Chen & Jiaping Liu & Pierluigi Salvadeo, 2025. "Towards Well-Being in Old Residential Areas: How Health-Promoting Environments Influence Resident Sentiment Within the 15-Minute Living Circle," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-32, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2035-:d:1769560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2035/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2035/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saelens, B.E. & Sallis, J.F. & Black, J.B. & Chen, D., 2003. "Neighborhood-Based Differences in Physical Activity: An Environment Scale Evaluation," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1552-1558.
    2. Xiang Luo & Shuchen Niu & Xin Li & Liwei Jing & Jingjing Qin & Yue Tang, 2025. "Urban Spatial Blessing: Effect of Land Use Intensity on Human Development Index," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-33, May.
    3. Mengyao Wang & Yu Yan & Mingxuan Li & Long Zhou, 2024. "Differences in Emotional Preferences toward Urban Green Spaces among Various Cultural Groups in Macau and Their Influencing Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Yuanyuan Huang & Bohong Zheng, 2024. "Social Media Users’ Visual and Emotional Preferences of Internet-Famous Sites in Urban Riverfront Public Spaces: A Case Study in Changsha, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-32, June.
    5. Jian Chen & Ying Fu & Shenglan Ma & Qiao Chen & Wanqing Zhang & Junlin Huang, 2025. "Research on the supply-demand balance evaluation and driving mechanism of community public service facilities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Peng Cui & Tingting Li & Zhengwei Xia & Chunyu Dai, 2022. "Research on the Effects of Soundscapes on Human Psychological Health in an Old Community of a Cold Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Xia, Fangzhou & Lu, Pingzhen, 2023. "Can mixed land use promote social integration? Multiple mediator analysis based on spatiotemporal big data in Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anura Amarasinghe & Gerard D'Souza & Cheryl Brown & Tatiana Borisova, 2006. "A Spatial Analysis of Obesity in West Virginia," Working Papers Working Paper 2006-13, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    2. Yanlong Guo & Ke Wang & Han Zhang & Zuoqing Jiang, 2022. "Soundscape Perception Preference in an Urban Forest Park: Evidence from Moon Island Forest Park in Lu’an City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Spielman, Seth E. & Yoo, Eun-hye, 2009. "The spatial dimensions of neighborhood effects," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1098-1105, March.
    4. Kevin Credit & Elizabeth Mack, 2019. "Place-making and performance: The impact of walkable built environments on business performance in Phoenix and Boston," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(2), pages 264-285, February.
    5. Mi Namgung & B. Elizabeth Mercado Gonzalez & Seungwoo Park, 2019. "The Role of Built Environment on Health of Older Adults in Korea: Obesity and Gender Differences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Courtney Coughenour & Hanns de la Fuente-Mella & Alexander Paz, 2019. "Analysis of Self-Reported Walking for Transit in a Sprawling Urban Metropolitan Area in the Western U.S," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Eric T. H. Chan & Tim Schwanen & David Banister, 2021. "The role of perceived environment, neighbourhood characteristics, and attitudes in walking behaviour: evidence from a rapidly developing city in China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 431-454, February.
    8. McNeill, Lorna Haughton & Kreuter, Matthew W. & Subramanian, S.V., 2006. "Social Environment and Physical activity: A review of concepts and evidence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 1011-1022, August.
    9. Fernando Fonseca & Escolástica Fernandes & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Walkable Cities: Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimarães, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    10. repec:rri:wpaper:200613 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Kent, Jennifer L. & Mulley, Corinne & Stevens, Nick, 2020. "Challenging policies that prohibit public transport use: Travelling with pets as a case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 86-94.
    12. Victor O. Akande & Robert A.C. Ruiter & Stef P.J. Kremers, 2019. "Environmental and Motivational Determinants of Physical Activity among Canadian Inuit in the Arctic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Letizia Appolloni & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Daniela D’Alessandro, 2019. "The Pleasure of Walking: An Innovative Methodology to Assess Appropriate Walkable Performance in Urban Areas to Support Transport Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, June.
    14. Jun-Hyun Kim & Chanam Lee & Wonmin Sohn, 2016. "Urban Natural Environments, Obesity, and Health-Related Quality of Life among Hispanic Children Living in Inner-City Neighborhoods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Park, Sungjin, 2008. "Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Path Walkability, and Testing Its Impacts on Transit Users’ Mode Choice and Walking Distance to the Station," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0ct7c30p, University of California Transportation Center.
    16. Razieh Zandieh & Javier Martinez & Johannes Flacke & Phil Jones & Martin Van Maarseveen, 2016. "Older Adults’ Outdoor Walking: Inequalities in Neighbourhood Safety, Pedestrian Infrastructure and Aesthetics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Guillem Artigues & Sara Mateo & Maria Ramos & Elena Cabeza, 2020. "Validation of the Urban Walkability Perception Questionnaire (UWPQ) in the Balearic Islands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Zimu Jia & Long Chen & Jingjia Chen & Guowei Lyu & Ding Zhou & Ying Long, 2020. "Urban modeling for streets using vector cellular automata: Framework and its application in Beijing," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1418-1439, October.
    19. Mouhcine Guettabi & Abdul Munasib, 2014. "Urban Sprawl, Obesogenic Environment, And Child Weight," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 378-401, June.
    20. Neatt, Kevin & Millward, Hugh & Spinney, Jamie, 2017. "Neighborhood walking densities: A multivariate analysis in Halifax, Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 9-16.
    21. Deepti Adlakha & J. Aaron Hipp & James F. Sallis & Ross C. Brownson, 2018. "Exploring Neighborhood Environments and Active Commuting in Chennai, India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2035-:d:1769560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.