IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16132-d991960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soundscape Perception Preference in an Urban Forest Park: Evidence from Moon Island Forest Park in Lu’an City

Author

Listed:
  • Yanlong Guo

    (Social Innovation Design Research Center, Department of Design, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, China
    Anhui Institute of Contemporary Studies, Anhui Academy of Social Sciences, Hefei 203106, China)

  • Ke Wang

    (Social Innovation Design Research Center, Department of Design, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, China)

  • Han Zhang

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Zuoqing Jiang

    (Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

Urban forest parks improve the environment by reducing noise, which can promote the development of physical and mental health. This study aimed to investigate the soundscape preferences of visitors in different spaces. It also provides practical suggestions for the study of urban green-space soundscapes. This study took the example of Moon Island Forest Park in Lu’an City, based on the questionnaire field survey that acquired public soundscape perception data. SPSS 26.0 was used to analyze five different spatial soundscape perception preferences in Moon Island Forest Park, starting from the subjective evaluation of users’ soundscape perception, based on user preference for different spatial sound source types. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used and a separate analysis of soundscape preferences in each space was undertaken; the mean (SD) was also used to reveal the respondents’ preference for each sound-source perceptual soundscape. The study found that the five dimensions of different spaces were significantly correlated with sound perception preferences. First, the same sound source had different perceptual characteristics and differences in different functional areas. Second, different spatial features were influenced differently by typical sound sources. Third, in each functional area, water sound was the main sound source of positive impact and mechanical sound was the main source of negative impact. Mechanical sound had the greatest negative impact on the overall area. Overall, natural sound provided the most popular significant contribution to the soundscape preference; second was the human voice, and mechanical sound produced a negative effect. The results of these studies were analyzed from the perspective of soundscape characteristics in different spaces, providing a more quantitative basis for urban forest park soundscape design.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanlong Guo & Ke Wang & Han Zhang & Zuoqing Jiang, 2022. "Soundscape Perception Preference in an Urban Forest Park: Evidence from Moon Island Forest Park in Lu’an City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16132-:d:991960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16132/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16132/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xun Zhu & Ming Gao & Wei Zhao & Tianji Ge, 2020. "Does the Presence of Birdsongs Improve Perceived Levels of Mental Restoration from Park Use? Experiments on Parkways of Harbin Sun Island in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Ian Ross & Giulia Greco & Charles Opondo & Zaida Adriano & Rassul Nala & Joe Brown & Robert Dreibelbis & Oliver Cumming, 2022. "Measuring and valuing broader impacts in public health: Development of a sanitation‐related quality of life instrument in Maputo, Mozambique," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 466-480, March.
    3. Xiaodan Hong & Weichen Zhang & Yiping Chu & Wenying Zhu, 2022. "Study on Subjective Evaluation of Acoustic Environment in Urban Open Space Based on “Effective Characteristics”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Zheng Zhao & Yanbin Wang & Yilei Hou, 2020. "Residents’ Spatial Perceptions of Urban Gardens Based on Soundscape and Landscape Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    5. César Asensio & Pierre Aumond & Arnaud Can & Luis Gascó & Peter Lercher & Jean-Marc Wunderli & Catherine Lavandier & Guillermo de Arcas & Carlos Ribeiro & Patricio Muñoz & Gaetano Licitra, 2020. "A Taxonomy Proposal for the Assessment of the Changes in Soundscape Resulting from the COVID-19 Lockdown," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-9, June.
    6. Svein Åge Kjøs Johnsen & Marin Kristine Brown & Leif Werner Rydstedt, 2022. "Restorative experiences across seasons? Effects of outdoor walking and relaxation exercise during lunch breaks in summer and winter," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 664-678, July.
    7. Xin-Chen Hong & Zhi-Peng Zhu & Jiang Liu & De-Hui Geng & Guang-Yu Wang & Si-Ren Lan, 2019. "Perceived Occurrences of Soundscape Influencing Pleasantness in Urban Forests: A Comparison of Broad-Leaved and Coniferous Forests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Peng Cui & Tingting Li & Zhengwei Xia & Chunyu Dai, 2022. "Research on the Effects of Soundscapes on Human Psychological Health in an Old Community of a Cold Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanlong Guo & Xingmeng Ma & Yelin Zhu & Denghang Chen & Han Zhang, 2023. "Research on Driving Factors of Forest Ecological Security: Evidence from 12 Provincial Administrative Regions in Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Su Wang & Huaidong He & Fulong Li & Qingqing Xiao, 2023. "A Study on the Soundscape of Underground Commercial Space in Lu’an City and Hefei City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Marina Eirini Stamatiadou & Iordanis Thoidis & Nikolaos Vryzas & Lazaros Vrysis & Charalampos Dimoulas, 2021. "Semantic Crowdsourcing of Soundscapes Heritage: A Mojo Model for Data-Driven Storytelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Phi-Yen Nguyen & Thomas Astell-Burt & Hania Rahimi-Ardabili & Xiaoqi Feng, 2021. "Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-38, October.
    4. Kuntong Huang & Taiyang Wang & Xueshun Li & Ruinan Zhang & Yu Dong, 2024. "Predicting and Optimizing Restorativeness in Campus Pedestrian Spaces based on Vision Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Daniel Bonet-Solà & Ester Vidaña-Vila & Rosa Ma Alsina-Pagès, 2023. "Analysis and Acoustic Event Classification of Environmental Data Collected in a Citizen Science Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Angel M. Dzhambov & Peter Lercher & Drozdstoy Stoyanov & Nadezhda Petrova & Stoyan Novakov & Donka D. Dimitrova, 2021. "University Students’ Self-Rated Health in Relation to Perceived Acoustic Environment during the COVID-19 Home Quarantine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Lin Zuo & Jie Zhang & Ronda J Zhang & Yingying Zhang & Meng Hu & Min Zhuang & Wei Liu, 2020. "The Transition of Soundscapes in Tourist Destinations from the Perspective of Residents’ Perceptions: A Case Study of the Lugu Lake Scenic Spot, Southwestern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Francesc Fusté-Forné & Maria Fusté Forné, 2021. "Urban Gardens as Sustainable Attractions for Children in Family Tourism," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, November.
    9. Beat Schäffer & Armin Taghipour & Jean Marc Wunderli & Mark Brink & Lél Bartha & Sabine J. Schlittmeier, 2022. "Does the Macro-Temporal Pattern of Road Traffic Noise Affect Noise Annoyance and Cognitive Performance?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Zahra Nourmohammadi & Tanapon Lilasathapornkit & Mudabber Ashfaq & Ziyuan Gu & Meead Saberi, 2021. "Mapping Urban Environmental Performance with Emerging Data Sources: A Case of Urban Greenery and Traffic Noise in Sydney, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Ke Wu & Peixue Liu & Zhenghu Nie, 2021. "Estimating the Economic Value of Soundscapes in Nature-Based Tourism Destinations: A Separation Attempt of a Pairwise Comparison Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Weizhen Xu & Dulai Zheng & Peilin Huang & Jiao Yu & Ziru Chen & Zhipeng Zhu & Jianwen Dong & Weicong Fu, 2022. "Does Bird Diversity Affect Public Mental Health in Urban Mountain Parks?—A Case Study in Fuzhou City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Aggelos Tsaligopoulos & Stella Sofia Kyvelou & Michalis Chiotinis & Aimilia Karapostoli & Eleftheria E. Klontza & Demetris F. Lekkas & Yiannis G. Matsinos, 2022. "The Sound of a Circular City: Towards a Circularity-Driven Quietness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Ralf C. Buckley & Mary-Ann Cooper, 2022. "Tourism as a Tool in Nature-Based Mental Health: Progress and Prospects Post-Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Tong-Yu Li & Si-Yuan Guo & Bin-Xia Xue & Qi Meng & Bo Jiang & Xin-Xin Xu & Chein-Chi Chang, 2022. "Effects of Soundscape on Flow State during Diabolo Exercise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Luca Fredianelli & Peter Lercher & Gaetano Licitra, 2022. "New Indicators for the Assessment and Prevention of Noise Nuisance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-5, October.
    17. Daniel Steele & Catherine Guastavino, 2021. "Quieted City Sounds during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Montreal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-21, May.
    18. Lin Qiao & Jingwei Zhuang & Xuan Zhang & Yang Su & Yiping Xia, 2021. "Assessing Emotional Responses to the Spatial Quality of Urban Green Spaces through Self-Report and Face Recognition Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Xin Cao & Yen Hsu, 2021. "RETRACTED: The Effects of Soundscapes in Relieving Stress in an Urban Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Francesco Aletta & Timothy Van Renterghem, 2021. "Associations between Personal Attitudes towards COVID-19 and Public Space Soundscape Assessment: An Example from Antwerp, Belgium," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16132-:d:991960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.