IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i9p1523-d1481268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Urban Design Performance on Walkability in Cultural Heritage Sites of Isfahan, Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Hessameddin Maniei

    (Research Group Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning (LLP), Department of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Reza Askarizad

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture (DICAAR), University of Cagliari, Via Marengo 2, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

  • Maryam Pourzakarya

    (School of Architecture, Design and Built Environment, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK)

  • Dietwald Gruehn

    (Research Group Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning (LLP), Department of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

Abstract

This research explores the impact of urban design performance qualities on pedestrian behavior in a cultural heritage site designated by UNESCO. The study employs a multi-method approach, including a questionnaire survey, empirical observation of pedestrian activities, and empirical axial line and visibility graph analysis using the space syntax technique. The first part of the study involved a questionnaire formatted as a polling sheet to gather expert assessments of spatial performance measures. The second part used a pilot survey to capture the perspectives of end users regarding the study’s objectives and their perceptions of the site. Pedestrian flow was observed using a technique called “gate counts”, with observations recorded as video clips during specific morning and afternoon periods across three pedestrian zones. The study also examined the behavioral patterns of pedestrians, including their movement patterns. Finally, the ArcGIS 10.3.1 software was employed to evaluate the reliability of the results. The main finding of this research is that pedestrian behavior and walkability in the historical areas are significantly influenced by landmark integration, wayfinding behavior, and the socio-economic functions of heritage sites. This study highlights the importance of using cognitive and syntactic analysis, community engagement, and historical preservation to enhance walkability, accessibility, and social interaction in heritage contexts. In addition, it identifies the need for improvements in urban design to address inconsistencies between syntactic maps and actual pedestrian flow, emphasizing the role of imageability and the impact of environmental and aesthetic factors on pedestrian movement. This research provides valuable insights for urban designers and planners, environmental psychologists, architects, and policymakers by highlighting the key elements that make urban spaces walkable, aiming to enhance the quality of public spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Hessameddin Maniei & Reza Askarizad & Maryam Pourzakarya & Dietwald Gruehn, 2024. "The Influence of Urban Design Performance on Walkability in Cultural Heritage Sites of Isfahan, Iran," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1523-:d:1481268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1523/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1523/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Hassan Ameli & Shima Hamidi & Andrea Garfinkel-Castro & Reid Ewing, 2015. "Do Better Urban Design Qualities Lead to More Walking in Salt Lake City, Utah?," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 393-410, July.
    2. Beverly J. Bass & Margaret Livingston, 2019. "Automotive retrofits in historic city centres and their potential effects on their walkability: a comparison of San Luis Obispo, CA, USA and Bath, England, UK," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 290-304, March.
    3. Mouratidis, Kostas, 2020. "Neighborhood characteristics, neighborhood satisfaction, and well-being: The links with neighborhood deprivation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. José Carpio-Pinedo & Manuel Benito-Moreno & Patxi J. Lamíquiz-Daudén, 2021. "Beyond land use mix, walkable trips. An approach based on parcel-level land use data and network analysis," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 23-30, January.
    5. Askarizad, Reza & Lamíquiz Daudén, Patxi José & Garau, Chiara, 2024. "Exploring the role of configurational accessibility of alleyways on facilitating wayfinding transportation within the organic street network systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 179-194.
    6. Charlotte Roscoe & Charlotte Sheridan & Mariya Geneshka & Susan Hodgson & Paolo Vineis & John Gulliver & Daniela Fecht, 2022. "Green Walkability and Physical Activity in UK Biobank: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Adults in Greater London," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Shima Hamidi & Somayeh Moazzeni, 2019. "Examining the Relationship between Urban Design Qualities and Walking Behavior: Empirical Evidence from Dallas, TX," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Marie Geraldine Herrmann Lunecke & Rodrigo Mora, 2018. "The layered city: pedestrian networks in downtown Santiago and their impact on urban vitality," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 336-353, May.
    9. Poklewski-Koziełł, Damian & Dudzic-Gyurkovich, Karolina & Duarte, Carlos Marmolejo, 2023. "Investigating urban form, and walkability measures in the new developments. The case study of Garnizon in Gdansk," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Regine Gerike & Caroline Koszowski & Bettina Schröter & Ralph Buehler & Paul Schepers & Johannes Weber & Rico Wittwer & Peter Jones, 2021. "Built Environment Determinants of Pedestrian Activities and Their Consideration in Urban Street Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Singleton, Patrick A. & Park, Keunhyun & Lee, Doo Hong, 2021. "Varying influences of the built environment on daily and hourly pedestrian crossing volumes at signalized intersections estimated from traffic signal controller event data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Zhehao Zhang & Thomas Fisher & Haiming Wang, 2023. "Walk Score, Environmental Quality and Walking in a Campus Setting," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Zhehao Zhang & Haiming Wang & Lei Pang & Thomas Fisher & Shuo Yang, 2023. "Comparisons of Built Environment Correlates of Walking in Urban and Suburban Campuses: A Case Study of Tianjin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, October.
    5. Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Ali Soltani, 2022. "Which Fabric/Scale Is Better for Transit-Oriented Urban Design: Case Studies in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Dwayne Marshall Baker, 2024. "Burden or benefit: Is retail marijuana facility siting influenced by LULU- or gentrification-related neighbourhood characteristics?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1049-1070, May.
    7. Baka, Anastasia & Mabon, Leslie, 2020. "Assessing equality in neighbourhood availability of quality greenspace in Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom," SocArXiv d9jeh, Center for Open Science.
    8. Iversen, Endre Kildal & Dugstad, Anders, 2024. "Spatial dimensions in stated preference valuation: The role of place attachment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Mohammed Mashary Alnaim & Abdelhakim Mesloub & Chaham Alalouch & Emad Noaime, 2025. "Reclaiming the Urban Streets: Evaluating Accessibility and Walkability in the City of Hail’s Streetscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-41, March.
    10. Anna Staniewska, 2022. "Gardens of Historic Mental Health Hospitals and Their Potential Use for Green Therapy Purposes," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Mikko Weckroth & Sanna Ala-Mantila & Dimitris Ballas & Thanasis Ziogas & Jonna Ikonen, 2022. "Urbanity, Neighbourhood Characteristics and Perceived Quality of Life (QoL): Analysis of Individual and Contextual Determinants for Perceived QoL in 3300 Postal Code Areas in Finland," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 139-164, November.
    12. Peter H. Bloch & Omid Kamran-Disfani, 2018. "A framework for studying the impact of outdoor atmospherics in retailing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 195-213, December.
    13. Claudia Burlando & Enrico Ivaldi & Andrea Ciacci, 2021. "Seniors’ Mobility and Perceptions in Different Urban Neighbourhoods: A Non-Aggregative Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Anqi Zhang & Weifeng Li & Jiayu Wu & Jian Lin & Jianqun Chu & Chang Xia, 2021. "How can the urban landscape affect urban vitality at the street block level? A case study of 15 metropolises in China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1245-1262, June.
    15. Lulu Chen & Yi Liu & Hong Leng & Suning Xu & Yichen Wang, 2022. "Current and Expected Value Assessment of the Waterfront Urban Design: A Case Study of the Comprehensive Urban Design of Beijing’s Waterfront," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    16. Yuyang Wu & Yao Yao & Shuliang Ren & Shiyi Zhang & Qingfeng Guan, 2023. "How do urban services facilities affect social segregation among people of different economic levels? A case study of Shenzhen city," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1502-1517, July.
    17. Zhang, Yanji & Wang, Jiejing & Kan, Changcheng, 2022. "Temporal variation in activity-space-based segregation: A case study of Beijing using location-based service data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. Kędra, Arleta & Maleszyk, Piotr & Visvizi, Anna, 2023. "Engaging citizens in land use policy in the smart city context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    19. Kwabena Mintah & Rejoice E. A. Churchill & Kingsley Tetteh Baako & Godwin Kavaarpuo, 2022. "Self-rated Health and Housing among Indigenous Australians," Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 181-193, September.
    20. Michael W. Mehaffy & Nikos A. Salingaros & Alexandros A. Lavdas, 2023. "The “Modern” Campus: Case Study in (Un)Sustainable Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-37, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1523-:d:1481268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.