IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i6p1233-d1171752.html

Effects of Forest Management Approach on Carbon Stock and Plant Diversity: A Case Study from Karnali Province, Nepal

Author

Listed:
  • Puspa Lamsal

    (Institute of Forestry, Hetauda Campus, Tribhuvan University, Hetauda 44107, Bagmati Province, Nepal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kamal Raj Aryal

    (Forest Research and Training Center, Surkhet 21700, Karnali Province, Nepal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hari Adhikari

    (Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Gayatri Paudel

    (Institute of Forestry, Hetauda Campus, Tribhuvan University, Hetauda 44107, Bagmati Province, Nepal)

  • Surya Kumar Maharjan

    (Institute of Forestry, Hetauda Campus, Tribhuvan University, Hetauda 44107, Bagmati Province, Nepal)

  • Dinesh Jung Khatri

    (Division Forest Office, Jumla 21200, Karnali Province, Nepal)

  • Ram P. Sharma

    (Forest Research and Training Center, Surkhet 21700, Karnali Province, Nepal)

Abstract

The mitigation of global warming and conservation of biodiversity are two significant environmental challenges today. Estimating and comparing forest carbon stock and plant diversity under different management approaches provide insight into the choice of management approaches for carbon and plant diversity management. We investigated the variation in carbon stock and diversity of plant species in two forest managements under different approaches: the Kakrebihar protection forest (PF) and Sano Surkhet community forest (CF) in Karnali Province, Surkhet, Nepal. In total, 63 sample plots (30 plots in PF and 33 plots in CF) were laid out systematically across the forests. Dendrometric measurements were carried out for trees, poles, and saplings, and representative leaf litter and herb samples were collected. Soil samples were taken at 10 cm, 20 cm, and 30 cm depths using a soil auger. The existing tree volume equations of tree species of interest were used to estimate tree volume, and species-specific wood density and conversion factors were used to obtain total biomass and carbon content. Soil samples were analyzed using the Walkley-Black method to determine soil organic carbon. PF had higher carbon stock, plant species richness, and abundance at the landscape level than CF; however, the scenario differed at the plot level. At the plot level, PF had significantly higher total carbon stock and biomass carbon stock than CF. However, PF and CF were statistically indistinguishable in term of soil carbon stock. At the plot level, PF and CF were statistically indistinguishable regarding richness, Simpson diversity, and Shannon diversity, but PF had significantly higher plant abundance than CF. In conclusion, the value of PF for carbon stock and plant diversity surpassed those of CF. This study suggests that PF might be a better strategy to enhance carbon stock in forests and maintain habitat for various plant species.

Suggested Citation

  • Puspa Lamsal & Kamal Raj Aryal & Hari Adhikari & Gayatri Paudel & Surya Kumar Maharjan & Dinesh Jung Khatri & Ram P. Sharma, 2023. "Effects of Forest Management Approach on Carbon Stock and Plant Diversity: A Case Study from Karnali Province, Nepal," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1233-:d:1171752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kurz, W.A. & Dymond, C.C. & White, T.M. & Stinson, G. & Shaw, C.H. & Rampley, G.J. & Smyth, C. & Simpson, B.N. & Neilson, E.T. & Trofymow, J.A. & Metsaranta, J. & Apps, M.J., 2009. "CBM-CFS3: A model of carbon-dynamics in forestry and land-use change implementing IPCC standards," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(4), pages 480-504.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Metsaranta, J.M. & Kurz, W.A., 2012. "Inter-annual variability of ecosystem production in boreal jack pine forests (1975–2004) estimated from tree-ring data using CBM-CFS3," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 111-123.
    2. Seidl, Rupert & Fernandes, Paulo M. & Fonseca, Teresa F. & Gillet, François & Jönsson, Anna Maria & Merganičová, Katarína & Netherer, Sigrid & Arpaci, Alexander & Bontemps, Jean-Daniel & Bugmann, Hara, 2011. "Modelling natural disturbances in forest ecosystems: a review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 903-924.
    3. Ima Ituen & Baoxin Hu, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Land Conversion on Carbon Stocks and GHG Emissions," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-31, August.
    4. Bona, Kelly A. & Webster, Kara L. & Thompson, Dan K. & Hararuk, Oleksandra & Zhang, Gary & Kurz, Werner A., 2024. "Using the Canadian Model for Peatlands (CaMP) to examine greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sink strength in Canada's boreal and temperate peatlands," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).
    5. Jing Zhao & Hui Hu & Jinglei Wang, 2022. "Forest Carbon Reserve Calculation and Comprehensive Economic Value Evaluation: A Forest Management Model Based on Both Biomass Expansion Factor Method and Total Forest Value," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Miquelajauregui, Yosune & Cumming, Steven G. & Gauthier, Sylvie, 2019. "Short-term responses of boreal carbon stocks to climate change: A simulation study of black spruce forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 409(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Ménard, Isabelle & Thiffault, Evelyne & Boulanger, Yan & Boucher, Jean-François, 2022. "Multi-model approach to integrate climate change impact on carbon sequestration potential of afforestation scenarios in Quebec, Canada," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    8. Wang, Z. & Grant, R.F. & Arain, M.A. & Bernier, P.Y. & Chen, B. & Chen, J.M. & Govind, A. & Guindon, L. & Kurz, W.A. & Peng, C. & Price, D.T. & Stinson, G. & Sun, J. & Trofymowe, J.A. & Yeluripati, J., 2013. "Incorporating weather sensitivity in inventory-based estimates of boreal forest productivity: A meta-analysis of process model results," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 260(C), pages 25-35.
    9. Alexandra Horobet & Sabri Boubaker & Lucian Belascu & Cristina Carmencita Negreanu & Zeno Dinca, 2024. "Technology-driven advancements: Mapping the landscape of algorithmic trading literature," Post-Print hal-04990283, HAL.
    10. Minhas, P.S. & Yadav, R.K. & Lal, K. & Chaturvedi, R.K., 2015. "Effect of long-term irrigation with wastewater on growth, biomass production and water use by Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm.) planted at variable stocking density," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 151-160.
    11. Griess, Verena C. & Man, Cosmin D. & Leclerc, Marie-Eve & Tansey, James & Bull, Gary Q., 2019. "Carbon stocks and timber harvest. Alternative policy approaches for the Great Bear rainforest and their consequences," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 147-156.
    12. Richard Dudley, 2010. "A little REDD model to quickly compare possible baseline and policy scenarios for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 53-69, January.
    13. Joan P. Casas-Ruiz & Pascal Bodmer & Kelly Ann Bona & David Butman & Mathilde Couturier & Erik J. S. Emilson & Kerri Finlay & Hélène Genet & Daniel Hayes & Jan Karlsson & David Paré & Changhui Peng & , 2023. "Integrating terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems to constrain estimates of land-atmosphere carbon exchange," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Bona, Kelly Ann & Shaw, Cindy & Thompson, Dan K. & Hararuk, Oleksandra & Webster, Kara & Zhang, Gary & Voicu, Mihai & Kurz, Werner A., 2020. "The Canadian model for peatlands (CaMP): A peatland carbon model for national greenhouse gas reporting," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    15. Pilli, Roberto & Grassi, Giacomo & Kurz, Werner A. & Smyth, Carolyn E. & Blujdea, Viorel, 2013. "Application of the CBM-CFS3 model to estimate Italy's forest carbon budget, 1995–2020," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 144-171.
    16. Smyth, C.E. & Kurz, W.A. & Trofymow, J.A., 2011. "Including the effects of water stress on decomposition in the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector CBM-CFS3," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(5), pages 1080-1091.
    17. Chao Liu & Yuan Liang & Yajin Zhao & Shuangshuang Liu & Chunbo Huang, 2021. "Simulation and Analysis of the Effects of Land Use and Climate Change on Carbon Dynamics in the Wuhan City Circle Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Asante, Patrick & Armstrong, Glen W., 2012. "Optimal forest harvest age considering carbon sequestration in multiple carbon pools: A comparative statics analysis," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 145-156.
    19. Zhen Xu & Carolyn E. Smyth & Tony C. Lemprière & Greg J. Rampley & Werner A. Kurz, 2018. "Climate change mitigation strategies in the forest sector: biophysical impacts and economic implications in British Columbia, Canada," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 257-290, February.
    20. Bibek Subedi & Alexandre Morneau & Luc LeBel & Shuva Gautam & Guillaume Cyr & Roxanne Tremblay & Jean-François Carle, 2025. "An XGBoost-Based Machine Learning Approach to Simulate Carbon Metrics for Forest Harvest Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-18, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1233-:d:1171752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.