IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v272y2014icp323-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of simulated estimates of forest ecosystem carbon stocks using ground plot data from Canada's National Forest Inventory

Author

Listed:
  • Shaw, C.H.
  • Hilger, A.B.
  • Metsaranta, J.
  • Kurz, W.A.
  • Russo, G.
  • Eichel, F.
  • Stinson, G.
  • Smyth, C.
  • Filiatrault, M.

Abstract

Assessing the uncertainties in the estimates obtained from forest carbon budget models used for national and international reporting is essential, but model evaluations are rarely conducted mainly because of lack of appropriate, independent ground plot data sets. Ecosystem carbon stock estimates for 696 ground plots from Canada's new National Forest Inventory enabled the assessment of carbon stocks predicted by the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector 3 (CBM-CFS3). This model uses country-specific parameters, incorporates all five ecosystem carbon pools, and uses a simulation-based approach to predict ecosystem C stocks from forest inventory data to implement a Tier-3 (most complex) approach of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (IPCC-GPG). The model is at the core of Canada's National Forest Carbon Monitoring, Accounting, and Reporting System (NFCMARS). The set of ground plots meets the IPCC-GPG standard for model evaluation as it is entirely independent of the model, but similar in type to that required for IPCC Tier-3 inventory-based C stock estimation. Model simulations for each ground plot used only the type of input data available to the NFCMARS for the national inventory report in 2010 and none of the model's default parameters were altered. Ecosystem total C stocks estimated by CBM-CFS3 were unbiased (mean difference=1.9Mgha−1, p=0.397), and significantly correlated (r=0.54, p=0.000) with ground plot-based estimates. Contribution to ecosystem total C stocks error from soil was large, and from deadwood and aboveground biomass small. Results for percent error in the aboveground biomass (7.5%) and IPCC defined deadwood (30.8%) pools compared favourably to the IPCC-GPG standards of 8% and 30%, respectively. Thus, we concluded that the CBM-CFS3 is reliable for reporting of C stocks in Canada's national greenhouse gas inventories. However, available standards for judging model reliability are few, and here we provide recommendations for the development of practical standards. Analyses by leading species (n=16) showed that error could often be attributed to a small subset of species and/or pools, allowing us to identify where improvements of input data and/or the model would most contribute to reducing uncertainties. This C stock comparison is one of the first ever to follow the evaluation process recommended by the IPCC-GPG for a Tier-3 model, and is a first step towards verification of greenhouse gas emission and removal estimates based on C stock changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaw, C.H. & Hilger, A.B. & Metsaranta, J. & Kurz, W.A. & Russo, G. & Eichel, F. & Stinson, G. & Smyth, C. & Filiatrault, M., 2014. "Evaluation of simulated estimates of forest ecosystem carbon stocks using ground plot data from Canada's National Forest Inventory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 323-347.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:272:y:2014:i:c:p:323-347
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.10.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013004699
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.10.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael W. I. Schmidt & Margaret S. Torn & Samuel Abiven & Thorsten Dittmar & Georg Guggenberger & Ivan A. Janssens & Markus Kleber & Ingrid Kögel-Knabner & Johannes Lehmann & David A. C. Manning & Pa, 2011. "Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property," Nature, Nature, vol. 478(7367), pages 49-56, October.
    2. James A Lutz & Andrew J Larson & Mark E Swanson & James A Freund, 2012. "Ecological Importance of Large-Diameter Trees in a Temperate Mixed-Conifer Forest," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Wang, Z. & Grant, R.F. & Arain, M.A. & Chen, B.N. & Coops, N. & Hember, R. & Kurz, W.A. & Price, D.T. & Stinson, G. & Trofymow, J.A. & Yeluripati, J. & Chen, Z., 2011. "Evaluating weather effects on interannual variation in net ecosystem productivity of a coastal temperate forest landscape: A model intercomparison," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(17), pages 3236-3249.
    4. Metsaranta, J.M. & Kurz, W.A., 2012. "Inter-annual variability of ecosystem production in boreal jack pine forests (1975–2004) estimated from tree-ring data using CBM-CFS3," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 111-123.
    5. Kurz, W.A. & Dymond, C.C. & White, T.M. & Stinson, G. & Shaw, C.H. & Rampley, G.J. & Smyth, C. & Simpson, B.N. & Neilson, E.T. & Trofymow, J.A. & Metsaranta, J. & Apps, M.J., 2009. "CBM-CFS3: A model of carbon-dynamics in forestry and land-use change implementing IPCC standards," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(4), pages 480-504.
    6. Sun, Jianfeng & Peng, Changhui & McCaughey, Harry & Zhou, Xiaolu & Thomas, Valerie & Berninger, Frank & St-Onge, Benoît. & Hua, Dong, 2008. "Simulating carbon exchange of Canadian boreal forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 276-286.
    7. W. Kurz & M. Apps, 2006. "Developing Canada's National Forest Carbon Monitoring, Accounting and Reporting System to Meet the Reporting Requirements of the Kyoto Protocol," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 33-43, January.
    8. White, Thomas & Luckai, Nancy & Larocque, Guy R. & Kurz, Werner A. & Smyth, Carolyn, 2008. "A practical approach for assessing the sensitivity of the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector (CBM-CFS3)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 373-382.
    9. Zhou, Xiaolu & Peng, Changhui & Dang, Qing-Lai & Sun, Jianfeng & Wu, Haibin & Hua, Dong, 2008. "Simulating carbon exchange in Canadian Boreal forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 287-299.
    10. Wang, Z. & Grant, R.F. & Arain, M.A. & Bernier, P.Y. & Chen, B. & Chen, J.M. & Govind, A. & Guindon, L. & Kurz, W.A. & Peng, C. & Price, D.T. & Stinson, G. & Sun, J. & Trofymowe, J.A. & Yeluripati, J., 2013. "Incorporating weather sensitivity in inventory-based estimates of boreal forest productivity: A meta-analysis of process model results," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 260(C), pages 25-35.
    11. Hagemann, Ulrike & Moroni, Martin T. & Shaw, Cindy H. & Kurz, Werner A. & Makeschin, Franz, 2010. "Comparing measured and modelled forest carbon stocks in high-boreal forests of harvest and natural-disturbance origin in Labrador, Canada," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(5), pages 825-839.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hararuk, Oleksandra & Shaw, Cindy & Kurz, Werner A., 2017. "Constraining the organic matter decay parameters in the CBM-CFS3 using Canadian National Forest Inventory data and a Bayesian inversion technique," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 364(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Tryggve Persson & Gustaf Egnell, 2018. "Stump harvesting for bioenergy: A review of climatic and environmental impacts in northern Europe and America," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(6), November.
    3. Komarov, Alexander & Chertov, Oleg & Bykhovets, Sergey & Shaw, Cindy & Nadporozhskaya, Marina & Frolov, Pavel & Shashkov, Maxim & Shanin, Vladimir & Grabarnik, Pavel & Priputina, Irina & Zubkova, Elen, 2017. "Romul_Hum model of soil organic matter formation coupled with soil biota activity. I. Problem formulation, model description, and testing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 345(C), pages 113-124.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Z. & Grant, R.F. & Arain, M.A. & Bernier, P.Y. & Chen, B. & Chen, J.M. & Govind, A. & Guindon, L. & Kurz, W.A. & Peng, C. & Price, D.T. & Stinson, G. & Sun, J. & Trofymowe, J.A. & Yeluripati, J., 2013. "Incorporating weather sensitivity in inventory-based estimates of boreal forest productivity: A meta-analysis of process model results," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 260(C), pages 25-35.
    2. Hararuk, Oleksandra & Shaw, Cindy & Kurz, Werner A., 2017. "Constraining the organic matter decay parameters in the CBM-CFS3 using Canadian National Forest Inventory data and a Bayesian inversion technique," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 364(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Miquelajauregui, Yosune & Cumming, Steven G. & Gauthier, Sylvie, 2019. "Short-term responses of boreal carbon stocks to climate change: A simulation study of black spruce forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 409(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Podur, Justin & Wotton, Michael, 2010. "Will climate change overwhelm fire management capacity?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(9), pages 1301-1309.
    5. Smyth, C.E. & Kurz, W.A. & Trofymow, J.A., 2011. "Including the effects of water stress on decomposition in the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector CBM-CFS3," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(5), pages 1080-1091.
    6. Metsaranta, J.M. & Kurz, W.A., 2012. "Inter-annual variability of ecosystem production in boreal jack pine forests (1975–2004) estimated from tree-ring data using CBM-CFS3," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 111-123.
    7. Wen, Xuding & Zhao, Zhonghui & Deng, Xiangwen & Xiang, Wenhua & Tian, Dalun & Yan, Wende & Zhou, Xiaolu & Peng, Changhui, 2014. "Applying an artificial neural network to simulate and predict Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantation carbon flux in subtropical China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 294(C), pages 19-26.
    8. Pilli, Roberto & Grassi, Giacomo & Kurz, Werner A. & Smyth, Carolyn E. & Blujdea, Viorel, 2013. "Application of the CBM-CFS3 model to estimate Italy's forest carbon budget, 1995–2020," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 144-171.
    9. Wang, Weifeng & Peng, Changhui & Zhang, S.Y. & Zhou, Xiaolu & Larocque, Guy R. & Kneeshaw, Daniel D. & Lei, Xiangdong, 2011. "Development of TRIPLEX-Management model for simulating the response of forest growth to pre-commercial thinning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2249-2261.
    10. Liu, Qiuyu & Peng, Changhui & Schneider, Robert & Cyr, Dominic & Liu, Zelin & Zhou, Xiaolu & Kneeshaw, Daniel, 2021. "TRIPLEX-Mortality model for simulating drought-induced tree mortality in boreal forests: Model development and evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    11. Zhang, Minxia & Chen, Shulin & Jiang, Hong & Peng, Changhui & Zhang, Jinmeng & Zhou, Guomo, 2020. "The impact of intensive management on net ecosystem productivity and net primary productivity of a Lei bamboo forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).
    12. Wang, Z. & Grant, R.F. & Arain, M.A. & Chen, B.N. & Coops, N. & Hember, R. & Kurz, W.A. & Price, D.T. & Stinson, G. & Trofymow, J.A. & Yeluripati, J. & Chen, Z., 2011. "Evaluating weather effects on interannual variation in net ecosystem productivity of a coastal temperate forest landscape: A model intercomparison," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(17), pages 3236-3249.
    13. Hagemann, Ulrike & Moroni, Martin T. & Shaw, Cindy H. & Kurz, Werner A. & Makeschin, Franz, 2010. "Comparing measured and modelled forest carbon stocks in high-boreal forests of harvest and natural-disturbance origin in Labrador, Canada," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(5), pages 825-839.
    14. Akinpelu, O.A. & Olaleye, O. & Fagbola, O., 2023. "The Soil Organic Matter Decomposers: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(4), August.
    15. Seidl, Rupert & Fernandes, Paulo M. & Fonseca, Teresa F. & Gillet, François & Jönsson, Anna Maria & Merganičová, Katarína & Netherer, Sigrid & Arpaci, Alexander & Bontemps, Jean-Daniel & Bugmann, Hara, 2011. "Modelling natural disturbances in forest ecosystems: a review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 903-924.
    16. Kristof Dorau & Chris Bamminger & Daniel Koch & Tim Mansfeldt, 2022. "Evidences of soil warming from long-term trends (1951–2018) in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 1-13, January.
    17. Shenghao Feng & Xiujian Peng & Philip Adams, 2021. "Energy and Economic Implications of Carbon Neutrality in China -- A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-318, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    18. Jing Zhao & Hui Hu & Jinglei Wang, 2022. "Forest Carbon Reserve Calculation and Comprehensive Economic Value Evaluation: A Forest Management Model Based on Both Biomass Expansion Factor Method and Total Forest Value," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Guoai Li & Xuxu Chai & Zheng Shi & Honghua Ruan, 2023. "Interactive Effects Determine Radiocarbon Abundance in Soil Fractions of Global Biomes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Isabel Teichmann, 2015. "An Economic Assessment of Soil Carbon Sequestration with Biochar in Germany," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1476, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:272:y:2014:i:c:p:323-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.