IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i5p962-d1133084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Scenario Land Use Change Simulation and Spatial Response of Ecosystem Service Value in Black Soil Region of Northeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Jiang

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Guoming Du

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Hao Teng

    (The Second Geomatics Cartography Institute, Ministry of Natural Resource, Harbin 150080, China)

  • Jun Wang

    (The Second Geomatics Cartography Institute, Ministry of Natural Resource, Harbin 150080, China
    College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China)

  • Haolin Li

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

Abstract

Simulating the spatial response of ecosystem service value (ESV) caused by land use change in Heilongjiang Province under different scenarios in the future is of great significance for ensuring ecological security and sustainable development in the region. Heilongjiang Province, an important grain-producing region in China, is taken as the research area in this study. Five land use maps (2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020) were used to evaluate the change of ecosystem service value in Heilongjiang Province in the past 20 years. In addition, the area of each land use type under different future scenarios was predicted by Markov model and MOP model, the future land use pattern was simulated based on PLUS model, the ESV under different scenarios was calculated, and the spatial distribution and the degree of ESV clustering were further explored. The results show that: (1) During 2000–2020, the built-up land in Heilongjiang Province continued to grow, with a total increase of 5076 km 2 during the 20-year period, the area of water continued to grow, the area of unused land gradually decreased, and the area of farmland and forest land changed less. (2) During the study period, the ESV in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020 were 1320.8 billion yuan, 1334.5 billion yuan, 1342.1 billion yuan, 1327.6 billion yuan, and 1328.4 billion yuan, respectively. Generally, it shows a fluctuating trend. (3) The ESV of natural development scenario (NDS), economic priority scenario (ERS) and ecological protection scenario (EPS) are 1334.3 billion yuan, 1254.8 billion yuan and 1455.6 billion yuan, respectively. The ESV of different scenarios is quite different. (4) The spatial distribution of ESV was higher in the northwest, central, and southeast, and lower in the east and west. The hot and cold spots of ESV are widely distributed and the degree of polymerization is high. The methods and conclusions of this study can provide scientific reference for the optimization of national spatial pattern and the formulation of sustainable development policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Jiang & Guoming Du & Hao Teng & Jun Wang & Haolin Li, 2023. "Multi-Scenario Land Use Change Simulation and Spatial Response of Ecosystem Service Value in Black Soil Region of Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:962-:d:1133084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/962/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/962/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuqing Zhao & Zenglin Han & Xiaolu Yan & Xuezhe Wang, 2022. "Integrating Spatial Heterogeneity into an Analysis between Ecosystem Service Value and Its Driving Factors: A Case Study of Dalian, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Guo Cai & Yuying Lin & Fazi Zhang & Shihe Zhang & Linsheng Wen & Baoyin Li, 2022. "Response of Ecosystem Service Value to Landscape Pattern Changes under Low-Carbon Scenario: A Case Study of Fujian Coastal Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Bhaskar Shrestha & Qinghua Ye & Nitesh Khadka, 2019. "Assessment of Ecosystem Services Value Based on Land Use and Land Cover Changes in the Transboundary Karnali River Basin, Central Himalayas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Chaoxu Luan & Renzhi Liu, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Various Land Use and Land Cover Change Models to Predict Ecosystem Service Value," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Costanza, Robert & de Groot, Rudolf & Braat, Leon & Kubiszewski, Ida & Fioramonti, Lorenzo & Sutton, Paul & Farber, Steve & Grasso, Monica, 2017. "Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 1-16.
    6. Wainger, Lisa A. & King, Dennis M. & Mack, Richard N. & Price, Elizabeth W. & Maslin, Thomas, 2010. "Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 978-987, March.
    7. Hemati, Touraj & Pourebrahim, Sharareh & Monavari, Masoud & Baghvand, Akbar, 2020. "Species-specific nature conservation prioritization (a combination of MaxEnt, Co$ting Nature and DINAMICA EGO modeling approaches)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 429(C).
    8. Haipeng Niu & Ran An & Dongyang Xiao & Mengmeng Liu & Xiaoming Zhao, 2022. "Estimation of Ecosystem Services Value at a Basin Scale Based on Modified Equivalent Coefficient: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin (Henan Section), China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Na Zhao & Hui Wang & Jingqiu Zhong & Dongqi Sun, 2022. "Assessment of Recreational and Cultural Ecosystem Services Value of Islands," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Xi Zhou & Maohua Ma & Qiao Chen & Wanyu Qi & Yuyao Gao & Jianzhao Cui, 2022. "Uneven Distribution of Ecosystem Services along the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin in Tibet Reveals the Quest for Multi-Target Policies of Rural Development in Less-Favored Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Tianyi Cai & Xueyuan Luo & Liyao Fan & Jing Han & Xinhuan Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Cropland Use Changes on Terrestrial Ecosystem Services Value in Newly Added Cropland Hotspots in China during 2000–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Deal, Robert L. & Cochran, Bobby & LaRocco, Gina, 2012. "Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 69-76.
    13. Egoh, Benis & Rouget, Mathieu & Reyers, Belinda & Knight, Andrew T. & Cowling, Richard M. & van Jaarsveld, Albert S. & Welz, Adam, 2007. "Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 714-721, September.
    14. Owais Bashir & Shabir Ahmad Bangroo & Wei Guo & Gowhar Meraj & Gebiaw T. Ayele & Nasir Bashir Naikoo & Shahid Shafai & Perminder Singh & Mohammad Muslim & Habitamu Taddese & Irfan Gani & Shafeeq Ur Ra, 2022. "Simulating Spatiotemporal Changes in Land Use and Land Cover of the North-Western Himalayan Region Using Markov Chain Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Vos, A. & Cumming, G.S. & Roux, D.J., 2017. "The relevance of cross-scale connections and spatial interactions for ecosystem service delivery by protected areas: Insights from southern Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PB), pages 133-139.
    2. Pacini, Gaio Cesare & Bruschi, Piero & Ferretti, Lorenzo & Santoni, Margherita & Serafini, Francesco & Gaifami, Tommaso, 2023. "FunBies, a model for integrated assessment of functional biodiversity of weed communities in agro-ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    3. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    4. Hao Wang & Sander Meijerink & Erwin van der Krabben, 2020. "Institutional Design and Performance of Markets for Watershed Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Fengran Wei & Mingshun Xiang & Lanlan Deng & Yao Wang & Wenheng Li & Suhua Yang & Zhenni Wu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics and Their Driving Forces of Ecological Service Value in Transitional Geospace: A Case Study in the Upper Reaches of the Minjiang River, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Bryan, Brett Anthony & Crossman, Neville David, 2013. "Impact of multiple interacting financial incentives on land use change and the supply of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 60-72.
    7. Hui Yang & Jiansheng Cao & Xianglong Hou, 2023. "Study on the Evaluation and Assessment of Ecosystem Service Spatial Differentiation at Different Scales in Mountainous Areas around the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Chaolei Yang & Jingyuan Li & Shuwen Jiang & Yufeng Tian & Canfeng Li & Wantao Yang & Haichuan Duan & Zong Wei & Yong Huang, 2024. "The Impacts of Land-Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Xie, Gaodi & Zhang, Caixia & Zhen, Lin & Zhang, Leiming, 2017. "Dynamic changes in the value of China’s ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 146-154.
    10. Yanjun Tong & Jun Lei & Shubao Zhang & Xiaolei Zhang & Tianyu Rong & Liqin Fan & Zuliang Duan, 2023. "Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Variability and Factors Influencing the Ecological Resilience in the Urban Agglomeration on the Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Kilgore, Michael A. & Ellefson, Paul V. & Funk, Travis J. & Frey, Gregory E., 2018. "Private forest owners and property tax incentive programs in the United States: A national review and analysis of ecosystem services promoted, landowner participation, forestland area enrolled, and ma," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 33-40.
    12. Ming Lu & Yan Zhang & Fan Liang & Yuanxiang Wu, 2022. "Spatial Relationship between Land Use Patterns and Ecosystem Services Value—Case Study of Nanjing," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Kwadwo Kyenkyehene Kusi & Abdellatif Khattabi & Nadia Mhammdi, 2023. "Analyzing the impact of land use change on ecosystem service value in the main watersheds of Morocco," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2688-2715, March.
    14. Acharya, Ram Prasad & Maraseni, Tek & Cockfield, Geoff, 2019. "Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation – An analysis of publications," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    15. Yinglong Hu & Xinxiang Chen & Guoliang Zhao & Xuejun Liu & Jian Yu & Min Li & Yang Liu & Xiaotong Hu & Rui Zhong & Yingbiao Chen, 2022. "Ecosystem Service Responses to Land Use Change in Southern Guangzhou—The Practice of Applying Natural Resources Integrated Database for Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, July.
    16. Qinglan Li & Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao & Qing He, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of the Impacts of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value: A Case from Guiyang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Kangas, Johanna & Ollikainen, Markku, 2022. "A PES scheme promoting forest biodiversity and carbon sequestration," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    18. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Examining policy−institution−program (PIP) responses against the drivers of ecosystem dynamics. A chronological review (1960–2020) from Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    19. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    20. Srijana Shrestha & Khem Narayan Poudyal & Nawraj Bhattarai & Mohan B. Dangi & John J. Boland, 2022. "An Assessment of the Impact of Land Use and Land Cover Change on the Degradation of Ecosystem Service Values in Kathmandu Valley Using Remote Sensing and GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:962-:d:1133084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.