IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i5p1067-d1146756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Structure and Evolution of Territorial Function of Rural Areas at Cultural Heritage Sites from the Perspective of Social Space

Author

Listed:
  • Chong Wu

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Mengling Yang

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Hang Zhang

    (Institute of Land and Urban-Rural Development, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Yafang Yu

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

Abstract

Affected by multiple factors, differentiated capital investment and power games have led to the uneven regional development of rural areas at cultural heritage sites. Therefore, it is urgent to reflect on the spatial equity and justice of heritage sites from the perspective of social space. This study took the territorial function of rural areas (TFRA) as its research objective, utilizing the UNESCO World Cultural Heritage Site—the Qinshihuang Mausoleum—and the Qianling Mausoleum and the Qiaoling Mausoleum in Shaanxi Province as cases. Based on the theory of spatial production, an index system of TFRA was constructed using social and spatial dimensions. Factor analysis and social–spatial differentiation indices were employed to identify the spatial structure and differentiation of TFRA. The results show the following: (1) the case areas reflect eight principal components, and these components have obvious spatial differentiation characteristics; (2) the principal components related to heritage display and utilization have had a sustained impact over the past decade, which have driven the development of related industries, but the scores of principal components related to the restrictions of heritage protection have been decreased; (3) six functional type zones are designated, and the spatial pattern of TFRA presented a concentric circle with a core-periphery structure, which is influenced by heritage protection zoning; (4) high-value-added functional spaces form and expand along transportation lines; (5) the inherent demand for capital proliferation is the fundamental driving force for the differentiation and evolution of TFRA at heritage sites. Based on the results of the above analysis, strategies of coordinated development between society and space are proposed to address the issue of uneven regional development at heritage sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Chong Wu & Mengling Yang & Hang Zhang & Yafang Yu, 2023. "Spatial Structure and Evolution of Territorial Function of Rural Areas at Cultural Heritage Sites from the Perspective of Social Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1067-:d:1146756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1067/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1067/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bade, David & Castillo, Jose Gabriel & Fernandez, Mario Andres & Aguilar-Bohorquez, Joseph, 2020. "The price premium of heritage in the housing market: evidence from Auckland, New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Soonki Kim, 2019. "Tourism Impacts Continuity of World Heritage List Inscription and Sustainable Management of Hahoe Village, Korea: A Case Study of Changes in Tourist Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-11, May.
    3. Di Zuo & Changrong Li & Mingliang Lin & Pinyu Chen & Xiang Kong, 2022. "Tourism, Residents Agent Practice and Traditional Residential Landscapes at a Cultural Heritage Site: The Case Study of Hongcun Village, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. John Iceland & Gregory Sharp, 2013. "White Residential Segregation in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: Conceptual Issues, Patterns, and Trends from the U.S. Census, 1980 to 2010," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 32(5), pages 663-686, October.
    5. Chengcai Tang & Qianqian Zheng & Pin Ng, 2019. "A Study on the Coordinative Green Development of Tourist Experience and Commercialization of Tourism at Cultural Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Alazaizeh, Mohammad M. & Hallo, Jeffrey C. & Backman, Sheila J. & Norman, William C. & Vogel, Melissa A., 2016. "Value orientations and heritage tourism management at Petra Archaeological Park, Jordan," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 149-158.
    7. Chauncy D. Harris & Edward L. Ullman, 1945. "The Nature of Cities," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 242(1), pages 7-17, November.
    8. Ladan Ghahramani & Katelin McArdle & Sandra Fatorić, 2020. "Minority Community Resilience and Cultural Heritage Preservation: A Case Study of the Gullah Geechee Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Wright, William C.C. & Eppink, Florian V., 2016. "Drivers of heritage value: A meta-analysis of monetary valuation studies of cultural heritage," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 277-284.
    10. Jing Shen & Rung-Jiun Chou & Rong Zhu & Shun-He Chen, 2022. "Experience of Community Resilience in Rural Areas around Heritage Sites in Quanzhou under Transition to a Knowledge Economy," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hung-Ming Tu, 2020. "Sustainable Heritage Management: Exploring Dimensions of Pull and Push Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Mario A. Fernandez & Shane L. Martin, 2020. "What’s so special about character?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3236-3251, December.
    3. Yuqing Geng & Hongwei Zhu & Renjun Zhu, 2022. "Coupling Coordination between Cultural Heritage Protection and Tourism Development: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Chin Tiong Cheng & Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling & Hon-Choong Chin & Pau Chung Leng, 2023. "Effects of Multifaceted Street Art on Price Premium of Pre War Commercial Buildings: The Case of Georgetown UNESCO World Heritage Site," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Luc Beal & Hugues Séraphin & Giuseppe Modica & Manuela Pilato & Marco Platania, 2019. "Analysing the Mediating Effect of Heritage Between Locals and Visitors: An Exploratory Study Using Mission Patrimoine as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Nuria Huete-Alcocer & Miguel Ángel Valero-Tévar, 2021. "Impact of Information Sources on Promoting Tourism in a Rural Region: The Case of the Roman Villa of Noheda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Tian Wang & Zhaoping Yang & Xiaodong Chen & Fang Han, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review of Tourism Destination Resilience Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Lin Meng & Chuanguang Zhu & Jie Pu & Bo Wen & Wentao Si, 2022. "Study on the Influence Mechanism of Intangible Cultural Heritage Distribution from Man–Land Relationship Perspective: A Case Study in Shandong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Chenavaz, Régis Y. & Leocata, Marta & Ogonowska, Malgorzata & Torre, Dominique, 2022. "Sustainable tourism," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    10. Mónica de Castro-Pardo & Pascual Fernández Martínez & Amelia Pérez Zabaleta & João C. Azevedo, 2021. "Dealing with Water Conflicts: A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Approaches to Manage Freshwater Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-32, April.
    11. Ferdinand Augusty Tae, 2021. "Destination authentic value advantage: an SDL perspective," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 101-117, June.
    12. Douglas S. Noonan & Ilde Rizzo, 2017. "Economics of cultural tourism: issues and perspectives," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(2), pages 95-107, May.
    13. Yafang Bao & Hanjing Jiang & Emily Ma & Zhi Sun & Lihua Xu, 2022. "A Longitudinal Spatial-Temporal Analysis of Ancient Village Tourism Development in Zhejiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela, 2018. "How do turbulent sectoral conditions sector influence the value of coal mining enterprises? Perspectives from the Central-Eastern Europe coal mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 103-112.
    15. Ron Johnston & Michael Poulsen & James Forrest, 2016. "Ethnic Residential Patterns in Urban England and Wales, 2001–2011: A System-Wide Analysis," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(1), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Jeremy E. Fiel & Yongjun Zhang, 2018. "Three Dimensions of Change in School Segregation: A Grade-Period-Cohort Analysis," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(1), pages 33-58, February.
    17. Francesca Di Turo & Laura Medeghini, 2021. "How Green Possibilities Can Help in a Future Sustainable Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Matthew Hall & John Iceland & Youngmin Yi, 2019. "Racial Separation at Home and Work: Segregation in Residential and Workplace Settings," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(5), pages 671-694, October.
    19. Jian Feng & Huali Hou, 2023. "Review of Research on Urban Social Space and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    20. Zhou, Yang, 2021. "The political economy of historic districts: The private, the public, and the collective," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1067-:d:1146756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.