IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9704-d1516093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Spatial Differentiation in Cultural Urban Land Use in China’s Ancient and Emerging Cities: A Comparative Case Study of Xi’an and Shenzhen

Author

Listed:
  • Ziliang Zhao

    (College of Architecture, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China
    China Academy of Urban-Rural Development & Cultural Heritage, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Xiaolong Li

    (College of Architecture, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China
    China Academy of Urban-Rural Development & Cultural Heritage, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Yaya Liu

    (College of Architecture, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China
    China Academy of Urban-Rural Development & Cultural Heritage, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Lingfan Yang

    (China Academy of Urban-Rural Development & Cultural Heritage, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Meng Liu

    (Shaanxi Institute of Urban & Rural Planning and Design, Xintai South Street 1418, Xi’an 710021, China)

Abstract

With the rapid urbanization of China in recent years, urban development has entered a new stage that focuses on improving the quality of growth. During this process, the excessive emphasis on economic growth and the neglect of spiritual and cultural aspects have led to various issues, such as cultural homogenization and urban identity crises. This study examined the development patterns behind this phenomenon by focusing on land specifically designated for urban cultural functions. Through the lens of cultural urban land use (CULU), a comparative study was conducted between the ancient city of Xi’an and the emerging city of Shenzhen. The study collected and processed point of interest (POI) and area of interest (AOI) data from both Xi’an and Shenzhen and analyzed the spatial characteristics of CULU using quantitative statistical methods. The analysis revealed multidimensional differentiation between the two cities in terms of value characteristics, historical characteristics, functional characteristics, and social consensus characteristics. Furthermore, the study applied the Spatial Circle Layer model (SCL) to analyze the spatial distribution differences in these characteristics between Xi’an and Shenzhen and identified key factors influencing these characteristics, such as the “formation and spatial distribution of key CULU” and the “historical continuity of urban space”. These findings were synthesized into the “anchoring–layering mechanism”. Our research explores why land designated for urban cultural functions exhibits different patterns in different cities, providing effective theoretical support for the planning and construction of such land in future urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziliang Zhao & Xiaolong Li & Yaya Liu & Lingfan Yang & Meng Liu, 2024. "Exploring Spatial Differentiation in Cultural Urban Land Use in China’s Ancient and Emerging Cities: A Comparative Case Study of Xi’an and Shenzhen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9704-:d:1516093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9704/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9704/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Na Xiu & Maria Ignatieva & Cecil Konijnendijk van den Bosch, 2019. "Historical perspectives on green structure development: the examples of Stockholm, Sweden and Xi’an, China," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 1050-1063, November.
    2. Chong Wu & Mengling Yang & Hang Zhang & Yafang Yu, 2023. "Spatial Structure and Evolution of Territorial Function of Rural Areas at Cultural Heritage Sites from the Perspective of Social Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Shujing Dong & Danjie Shen, 2023. "A Study of Historical Urban Landscape Layering in Luoyang Based on Historical Map Translation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Jose Lobo & Luis MA Bettencourt & Michael E Smith & Scott Ortman, 2020. "Settlement scaling theory: Bridging the study of ancient and contemporary urban systems," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(4), pages 731-747, March.
    5. Hongpeng Fu & Jiao Liu & Xiaotian Dong & Zhenlin Chen & Min He, 2024. "Evaluating the Sustainable Development Goals within Spatial Planning for Decision-Making: A Major Function-Oriented Zone Planning Strategy in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Hao Lei & Youmei Zhou, 2022. "Conducting Heritage Tourism-Led Urban Renewal in Chinese Historical and Cultural Urban Spaces: A Case Study of Datong," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Lingfan Yang & Xiaolong Luo & Ziyao Ding & Xiaoman Liu & Zongni Gu, 2022. "Restructuring for Growth in Development Zones, China: A Systematic Literature and Policy Review (1984–2022)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-32, June.
    8. Francesca Nocca, 2017. "The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessio D’Auria & Pasquale De Toro & Nicola Fierro & Elisa Montone, 2018. "Integration between GIS and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Ecosystem Services Assessment: A Methodological Proposal for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Hala Sirror, 2024. "Innovative Approaches to Windcatcher Design: A Review on Balancing Tradition Sustainability and Modern Technologies for Enhanced Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-27, November.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0243621 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Elena Gorbenkova & Elena Shcherbina, 2020. "Historical-Genetic Features in Rural Settlement System: A Case Study from Mogilev District (Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Tomas Kačerauskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Rasa Bartkute, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability of Creative Economy: Evidence from a Lithuanian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Qingsong He & Lingping Huang & Jing Li, 2022. "Rediscovering the Scaling Law of Urban Land from a Multi-Scale Perspective—A Case Study of Wuhan," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Sitong Wu & Hanyu Wei & Guoguang Wang, 2025. "Analysis of the Layering Characteristics and Value Space Coupling Coordination of the Historic Landscape of Chaozhou Ancient City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-32, August.
    8. Deborah Strumsky & Luis Bettencourt & José Lobo, 2023. "Agglomeration effects as spatially embedded social interactions: identifying urban scaling beyond metropolitan areas," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(7), pages 1964-1980, September.
    9. Francesca Di Turo & Laura Medeghini, 2021. "How Green Possibilities Can Help in a Future Sustainable Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Aureliano S S Paiva & Gervásio F Santos & Caio P Castro & Daniel A Rodriguez & Usama Bilal & J Firmino de Sousa Filho & Anderson Freitas & Felipe Montes & Iryna Dronova & Maurício L Barreto & Roberto , 2023. "A scaling investigation of urban form features in Latin America cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Carlos J. Pardo Abad, 2020. "Valuation of Industrial Heritage in Terms of Sustainability: Some Cases of Tourist Reference in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    12. Luigi Petti & Claudia Trillo & Busisiwe Ncube Makore, 2020. "Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development Targets: A Possible Harmonisation? Insights from the European Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Dingyu Wang & Yan Zhang & Qiang Niu & Yijie Wan & Lei Wu, 2025. "Comprehensive Urban Assessment and Major Function Verification Based on City Examination: The Case of Hubei Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, August.
    14. Saja Kosanović & Branislav Folić & Stefan Kovačević & Ivana Nikolić & Ljubiša Folić, 2019. "A Study on the Sustainability of the Traditional Sirinić Houses in the Šar Mountain Region, the South-Western Balkans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Mustafa Özgeriş & Neslihan Demircan & Ayşe Karahan & Oğuz Gökçe & Faris Karahan & Işık Sezen & Elif Akpınar Külekçi, 2024. "Cultural Heritage Management in the Context of Sustainable Tourism: The Case of Öşkvank Monastery (Uzundere, Erzurum)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Andres Gomez-Lievano & Michail Fragkias, 2024. "The benefits and costs of agglomeration: insights from economics and complexity," Papers 2404.13178, arXiv.org.
    17. Debin Ma & Jie Zhang & Ziyi Wang & Dongqi Sun, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Open Economy Development in the Yangtze River Delta Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.
    18. Zhongde Wang & Yuhan Liu & Ling Yang & Fanwei Meng, 2025. "Evaluation of the Narrative Value and Experiential Quality of Urban Trails: A Case Study of the Southwest Regional Trail in Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.
    19. Gül Aktürk & Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi, 2021. "Cultural Landscapes under the Threat of Climate Change: A Systematic Study of Barriers to Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Hamza Alqudah & Mohammad Al-Qudah & Yazan Abu Huson & Abdalwali Lutfi & Mahmaod Alrawad & Mohammed Amin Almaiah, 2024. "A Decade of Green Economic Literature: An Analysis-Based Bibliometric," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 497-511, May.
    21. Li Li & Yongjian Wu & Jin Zhang, 2025. "Bridging Heritage Conservation and Urban Sustainability: A Multidimensional Coupling Framework for Walkability, Greening, and Cultural Heritage in the Historic City of Shenyang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9704-:d:1516093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.