IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i9p1767-d1738258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Layering Characteristics and Value Space Coupling Coordination of the Historic Landscape of Chaozhou Ancient City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Sitong Wu

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Hanyu Wei

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Guoguang Wang

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

Abstract

The historic landscape and the value of the ancient city in the stock era present a diversified and mixed problem; as such, this study explores a quantifiable spatial correlation method for landscape layering characteristics and value space, in order to provide support for the urban renewal paths that integrate historical and contemporary needs. Taking as an example Chaozhou Ancient City, a renowned historical and cultural city in China, this study draws on the theory of historical urban landscape layering and comprehensively uses historical graphic interpretation, GIS spatial quantitative analysis, the single-land-use dynamic degree model, the Analytic Network Process, and the Delphi method to quantitatively analyze and evaluate the landscape layering characteristics and value space of the ancient city. Meanwhile, it explores the relationship between the historical landscape layering characteristics and value space of ancient cities using the spatial autocorrelation model and the coupling coordination modulus model. The key findings are as follows: (1) The high-layer space (66.1%) and high-value space (31.1%) of the historic landscape of Chaozhou Ancient City show significant mismatch and imbalance. Spatially, layer spaces increase from the city center toward the periphery, whereas value spaces decrease from the center outward, demonstrating marked spatial heterogeneity. (2) The layer–value space shows a spatial distribution of agglomeration, with Moran’s I index values of 0.2712 and 0.6437, respectively. The agglomeration degree of the value space is much higher than that of the layer space, and both show significant non-equilibrium and associative coupling. (3) Coupling coordination: basically balanced (D = 0.56) indicates a transition toward a more integrated state, although 48% of the region remains in a state of severe dysfunction, mainly consisting of two types of spaces: “high-layer–high-value” and “low-layer–low-value.” These two dysfunctional types should be prioritized in future conservation and renewal strategies. This study provides a more comprehensive quantitative analysis path for identifying and evaluating the landscape layer–value space of the ancient city, providing visualization tools and decision-making support for the future protection and renewal of Chaozhou Ancient City and the declaration of the World Heritage.

Suggested Citation

  • Sitong Wu & Hanyu Wei & Guoguang Wang, 2025. "Analysis of the Layering Characteristics and Value Space Coupling Coordination of the Historic Landscape of Chaozhou Ancient City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-32, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1767-:d:1738258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1767/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1767/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Xun & Hui, Eddie C.M. & Chen, Tingting & Lang, Wei & Guo, Youliang, 2019. "From Habitat III to the new urbanization agenda in China: Seeing through the practices of the “three old renewals” in Guangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 513-522.
    2. Dong Xu & Guolin Hou, 2019. "The Spatiotemporal Coupling Characteristics of Regional Urbanization and Its Influencing Factors: Taking the Yangtze River Delta as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Armands Auzins & Uchendu Eugene Chigbu, 2021. "Values-Led Planning Approach in Spatial Development: A Methodology," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Liwen Jiang & Jun Cai & Yilun Fan, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Distribution and Heritage Corridor Construction of Vernacular Architectural Heritage in the Cao’e River, Jiaojiang River, and Oujiang River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Jia Tao & Meng Yang & Jing Wu, 2022. "Coupling Coordination Evaluation of Lakefront Landscape Spatial Quality and Public Sentiment," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-29, June.
    6. Shujing Dong & Danjie Shen, 2023. "A Study of Historical Urban Landscape Layering in Luoyang Based on Historical Map Translation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Marichela Sepe, 2013. "Urban history and cultural resources in urban regeneration: a case of creative waterfront renewal," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 595-613, October.
    8. Beynon, Malcolm, 2002. "An analysis of distributions of priority values from alternative comparison scales within AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 104-117, July.
    9. Xiaotong Xie & Xiaoshun Li & Huiping Fan, 2022. "Research on the Interactive Coupling Relationship between Land Space Development and Eco-Environment from the Perspective of Symbiosis: A Practical Analysis of Henan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Dan Chen, 2023. "How Visitors Perceive Heritage Value—A Quantitative Study on Visitors’ Perceived Value and Satisfaction of Architectural Heritage through SEM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Ken Taylor, 2016. "The Historic Urban Landscape paradigm and cities as cultural landscapes. Challenging orthodoxy in urban conservation," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 471-480, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiangang Shi & Xinru Min & Hongyun Si & Daizhong Tang & Wei Miao, 2019. "The Transition from Housing Demolition to Conservation and Renovation in Shanghai: Challenges and Countermeasures," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Fei Tao & Guoan Tang & Yihao Wu & Tong Zhou, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and Driving Mechanism of Co-Ordinated Urban Development: A Case Study of the Central Area of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Yan Xin & Dongchuan Wang & Lihui Zhang & Yingyi Ma & Xing Chen & Haiqing Wang & Hongyi Wang & Kangjian Wang & Hui Long & Hua Chai & Jianshe Gao, 2022. "Cooperative analysis of infrastructure perfection and residents’ living standards in poverty-stricken counties in Qinghai Province," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3687-3703, March.
    4. Wadjidou Boukari & Fenjie Long & Imorou Abdou-Latif, 2025. "Can affordable housing supply exclusively stop urban sprawl?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 8317-8355, April.
    5. Hao Lei & Youmei Zhou, 2022. "Conducting Heritage Tourism-Led Urban Renewal in Chinese Historical and Cultural Urban Spaces: A Case Study of Datong," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Xuesong Sun & Zaisheng Zhang, 2021. "Coupling and Coordination Level of the Population, Land, Economy, Ecology and Society in the Process of Urbanization: Measurement and Spatial Differentiation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Tingzhu Li & Ran Liu & Wei Qi, 2019. "Regional Heterogeneity of Migrant Rent Affordability Stress in Urban China: A Comparison between Skilled and Unskilled Migrants at Prefecture Level and Above," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, October.
    8. Yang Li & Wei Zheng & Qirui Zhou, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Knowledge-Driven Urban Innovation: Dynamics of Elevator Installation in Aging Residential Communities," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 6315-6359, June.
    9. Li Li & Xiaoping Zhou & Lan Yang & Jinglong Duan & Zhuo Zeng, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Ecological Risk in China’s North–South Transition Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Suling Guo & Wei Sun & Wen Chen & Jianxin Zhang & Peixue Liu, 2021. "Impact of Artificial Elements on Mountain Landscape Perception: An Eye-Tracking Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Lin Jiang & Yani Lai & Ke Chen & Xiao Tang, 2022. "What Drives Urban Village Redevelopment in China? A Survey of Literature Based on Web of Science Core Collection Database," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Jongseok Seo & Lidziya Lysiankova & Young-Seok Ock & Dongphil Chun, 2017. "Priorities of Coworking Space Operation Based on Comparison of the Hosts and Users’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-10, August.
    13. Yanni Xiong & Changyou Li & Mengzhi Zou & Qian Xu, 2022. "Investigating into the Coupling and Coordination Relationship between Urban Resilience and Urbanization: A Case Study of Hunan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Ruishan Chen & Chao Ye, 2022. "Land Perspectives: People, Tenure, Planning, Tools, Space, and Health," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-5, February.
    15. Longlong Zhang & Jingwen Yuan & Chulsoo Kim, 2022. "Sustainable Planning and Design of Ocean City Spatial Forms Based on Space Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Yansong Zhang & Yujie Wei & Yu Mao, 2023. "Sustainability Assessment of Regional Water Resources in China Based on DPSIR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Juan A. García-Esparza, 2022. "Urban Scene Protection and Unconventional Practices—Contemporary Landscapes in World Heritage Cities of Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Cao, Kexin & Deng, Yu & Wang, Wenxue & Liu, Shenghe, 2023. "The spatial heterogeneity and dynamics of land redevelopment: Evidence from 287 Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    19. Min Yin & Jiangang Xu & Zhongyuan Yang, 2019. "Preliminary Research on Planning of Decentralizing Ancient Towns in Small-Scale Famous Historic and Cultural Cities with a Case Study of Tingchow County, Fujian Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco, 2020. "Measuring the urban sustainable development in cities through a Composite Index: The case of Portugal," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 507-520, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1767-:d:1738258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.