IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i5p1060-d1145876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco–Environmental Effects of “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Land Use Changes and Recommendations for Ecological Restoration: A Case Study of the Weibei Dryland in Shaanxi Province

Author

Listed:
  • Junfang Jin

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Shuyan Yin

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Hanmin Yin

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Xin Bai

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

Abstract

As eco–environmental effects have become important considerations in the construction and planning of production, living, and ecological spaces, we used a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze the eco–environmental effects’ spatiotemporal evolution and present appropriate ideas for ecological restoration based on the land use data. The results show that during the research period both an improvement and degradation of the regional eco–environment occurred simultaneously. In the earlier period, the ecological environment tended to be worse, while in the later period, the eco–environmental quality was dramatically enhanced. Pasture ecological land in the study area had the strongest positive impact on the eco–environmental quality, while the negative effect of agricultural production land was severe. The quality of the regional eco−environment was enhanced (degraded) due to the extension (contraction) of ecological land. The construction of an ecological environment is a complex engineering task. Although the eco−environment in most areas of the study area showed an improving trend, the overall eco–environment remains relatively fragile. In the course of supporting high–quality regional social and economic growth and pursuing high–level environmental preservation strategies, we should take corresponding measures to protect and repair the regional ecological environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Junfang Jin & Shuyan Yin & Hanmin Yin & Xin Bai, 2023. "Eco–Environmental Effects of “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Land Use Changes and Recommendations for Ecological Restoration: A Case Study of the Weibei Dryland in Shaanxi Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1060-:d:1145876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1060/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1060/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryan P. Powers & Walter Jetz, 2019. "Global habitat loss and extinction risk of terrestrial vertebrates under future land-use-change scenarios," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(4), pages 323-329, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunrong Mi & Liang Ma & Mengyuan Yang & Xinhai Li & Shai Meiri & Uri Roll & Oleksandra Oskyrko & Daniel Pincheira-Donoso & Lilly P. Harvey & Daniel Jablonski & Barbod Safaei-Mahroo & Hanyeh Ghaffari , 2023. "Global Protected Areas as refuges for amphibians and reptiles under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Stephanie D. Maier & Jan Paul Lindner & Javier Francisco, 2019. "Conceptual Framework for Biodiversity Assessments in Global Value Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-34, March.
    3. James P. Herrera & Jean Yves Rabezara & Ny Anjara Fifi Ravelomanantsoa & Miranda Metz & Courtni France & Ajilé Owens & Michelle Pender & Charles L. Nunn & Randall A. Kramer, 2021. "Food insecurity related to agricultural practices and household characteristics in rural communities of northeast Madagascar," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(6), pages 1393-1405, December.
    4. Ziqi Meng & Jinwei Dong & Erle C. Ellis & Graciela Metternicht & Yuanwei Qin & Xiao-Peng Song & Sara Löfqvist & Rachael D. Garrett & Xiaopeng Jia & Xiangming Xiao, 2023. "Post-2020 biodiversity framework challenged by cropland expansion in protected areas," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 758-768, July.
    5. Christianson, Anne B. & Montgomery, Rebecca & Fleischman, Forrest & Nelson, Kristen C., 2022. "Exploring wildlife disservices and conservation in the context of ecosystem-based adaptation: A case study in the Mt. Elgon region, Uganda," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    6. Yayan Lu & Junhong Zhao & Jianwei Qi & Tianyu Rong & Zhi Wang & Zhaoping Yang & Fang Han, 2022. "Monitoring the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Habitat Quality and Its Driving Factors Based on the Coupled NDVI-InVEST Model: A Case Study from the Tianshan Mountains in Xinjiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Xuebin Zhang & Litang Yao & Jun Luo & Wenjuan Liang, 2022. "Exploring Changes in Land Use and Landscape Ecological Risk in Key Regions of the Belt and Road Initiative Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Kong, Xuesong & Fu, Mengxue & Zhao, Xiang & Wang, Jing & Jiang, Ping, 2022. "Ecological effects of land-use change on two sides of the Hu Huanyong Line in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    9. Shilei Wang & Yanbo Qu & Weiying Zhao & Mei Guan & Zongli Ping, 2022. "Evolution and Optimization of Territorial-Space Structure Based on Regional Function Orientation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, March.
    10. Jason Alexandra, 2022. "Designer Ecosystems for the Anthropocene—Deliberately Creating Novel Ecosystems in Cultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, March.
    11. Drechsler, Martin, 2023. "Ecological and economic trade-offs between amount and spatial aggregation of conservation and the cost-effective design of coordination incentives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    12. Chunsheng Wu, 2022. "Study on the Spatial Differences in Land-Use Change and Driving Factors in Tibet," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Lintao Liu & Shouchao Yu & Hengjia Zhang & Yong Wang & Chao Liang, 2023. "Analysis of Land Use Change Drivers and Simulation of Different Future Scenarios: Taking Shanxi Province of China as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Wenxing Du & Yuxia Wang & Dingyi Qian & Xiao Lyu, 2022. "Process and Eco-Environment Impact of Land Use Function Transition under the Perspective of “Production-Living-Ecological” Spaces—Case of Haikou City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Gotor, E. & Nedumaran, S. & Cenacchi, N. & Tran, N. & Dunston, S. & Dermawan, A. & Wiberg, David & Tesfaye, K. & Mausch, K. & Langan, Simon, 2021. "Land and water systems: looking to the future and a more resilient and sustainable society and environment," IWMI Working Papers H050899, International Water Management Institute.
    16. Feldt, Tobias & Karg, Hanna & Kadaouré, Ibrahima & Bessert, Leon & Schlecht, Eva, 2020. "Growing struggle over rising demand: How land use change and complex farmer-grazier conflicts impact grazing management in the Western Highlands of Cameroon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Olesia Havryliuk & Vira Hovorukha & Oleksandr Savitsky & Volodymyr Trilis & Antonina Kalinichenko & Agnieszka Dołhańczuk-Śródka & Daniel Janecki & Oleksandr Tashyrev, 2021. "Anaerobic Degradation of Environmentally Hazardous Aquatic Plant Pistia stratiotes and Soluble Cu(II) Detoxification by Methanogenic Granular Microbial Preparation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Barnabas H. Daru & T. Jonathan Davies & Charles G. Willis & Emily K. Meineke & Argo Ronk & Martin Zobel & Meelis Pärtel & Alexandre Antonelli & Charles C. Davis, 2021. "Widespread homogenization of plant communities in the Anthropocene," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Davor Mance & Katarina Krunić & Diana Mance, 2021. "Protecting Species by Promoting Protected Areas and Human Development—A Panel Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Coppée, Thomas & Paquet, Jean-Yves & Titeux, Nicolas & Dufrêne, Marc, 2022. "Temporal transferability of species abundance models to study the changes of breeding bird species based on land cover changes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1060-:d:1145876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.