IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i5p1046-d1144513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Ecosystem Service Contribution and Identification of Trade-Off/Synergy Relationship for Ecosystem Regulation in the Dabie Mountains of Western Anhui Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Muyi Huang

    (School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
    Anhui Institute of Ecological Civilization, Hefei 230601, China
    Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Qilong Wang

    (College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Qi Yin

    (College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Weihua Li

    (School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
    Anhui Institute of Ecological Civilization, Hefei 230601, China
    Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Guozhao Zhang

    (School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
    Anhui Institute of Ecological Civilization, Hefei 230601, China
    Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Qiaojun Ke

    (School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
    Anhui Institute of Ecological Civilization, Hefei 230601, China
    Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Qin Guo

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China)

Abstract

The study of tradeoffs/synergies among ecosystem services (ESs) is highly significant for land-use planning and regional ecosystem optimization. Land-use change and topographic factors have important implications for ESs. Strengthening the comparative analysis of the capacity of ESs provided by different land-use types in specific regions, studying the topographic gradient effects of ecosystem service trade-offs/synergies with slope changes, and identifying the dominate trade-off/synergy relationship among ESs will help us to carry out ecosystem regulation according to local conditions through land-use layout optimization at a fine scale. Our research site was located in the Dabie Mountains of western Anhui Province, China (DBM), where, based on the InVEST software, R language, self-organizing maps (SOM), and GeoDA, the temporal and spatial variations of five typical ESs, including food supply, soil retention, water yield, carbon storage, and biodiversity maintenance from 2005 to 2020, were analyzed, and spatial distributions of the different ESs clusters were also recognized by using the SOM method. Moreover, the impacts of land-use type and slope on ESs, and the characteristics of trade-offs/synergies among the five ESs, were discussed. Results showed, firstly, that the total values of ESs showed a changing trend of “three increases and two decreases” from 2005 to 2020. Among the ESs, food supply, soil retention and water yield showed upward trends, with annual growth rates of 2.83%, 6.50% and 2.98%, respectively, whereas carbon storage and biodiversity maintenance showed downward trends, with annual decline rates of 0.03% and 0.07%, respectively. Second, the results showed that the Moran’s I index of the total ESs was 0.3995 in 2005 and 0.4305 in 2020, respectively, indicating that they had significant spatial clustering characteristics. The Low-Low clustering regions with reduced changes were mainly in the central and northern parts of the study area, whereas the High-High clustering regions with increased changes were found distributed mainly in the south of the study area. Thirdly, it was found that cropland and woodland were the main contributors to the total amounts of ESs, but the supply capacity of ESs per unit area of woodland was the largest, constituting nearly 1/3 of the total supply capacity of the ESs. Last, the slope effect on trade-offs and synergies was significant between typical ecosystem service pairs in the study area; trade-offs were the main relationships between the pairs of ESs in the study area, which accounted for nearly 60% of all types of trade-offs/synergies during the 15 years. In addition, the spatial distributions of the trade-offs/synergies between ESs pairs were visualized clearly, and the six ES bundles were identified by using the SOM method at the township administrative scale. The identification of ecosystem service bundles is of great significance for the division of ecological functional zones and ecological regulation in the DBM.

Suggested Citation

  • Muyi Huang & Qilong Wang & Qi Yin & Weihua Li & Guozhao Zhang & Qiaojun Ke & Qin Guo, 2023. "Analysis of Ecosystem Service Contribution and Identification of Trade-Off/Synergy Relationship for Ecosystem Regulation in the Dabie Mountains of Western Anhui Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1046-:d:1144513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1046/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1046/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohsen Japelaghi & Fariba Hajian & Mehdi Gholamalifard & Biswajeet Pradhan & Khairul Nizam Abdul Maulud & Hyuck-Jin Park, 2022. "Modelling the Impact of Land Cover Changes on Carbon Storage and Sequestration in the Central Zagros Region, Iran Using Ecosystem Services Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Alexis Comber & Paul Harris, 2022. "The Importance of Scale and the MAUP for Robust Ecosystem Service Evaluations and Landscape Decisions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Feng, Zhe & Jin, Xueru & Chen, Tianqian & Wu, Jiansheng, 2021. "Understanding trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services to support the decision-making in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Rimal, Bhagawat & Sharma, Roshan & Kunwar, Ripu & Keshtkar, Hamidreza & Stork, Nigel E. & Rijal, Sushila & Rahman, Syed Ajijur & Baral, Himlal, 2019. "Effects of land use and land cover change on ecosystem services in the Koshi River Basin, Eastern Nepal," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lan Wang & Changwei Zhou, 2024. "Evaluation of Perceptions Using Facial Expression Scores on Ecological Service Value of Blue and Green Spaces in 61 Parks in Guizhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jingheng Wang & Meichen Fu & Xiangxue Han & Yuting Wu & Hongyan Wen, 2025. "Research on Human Needs and the Valorization of Supply–Need Relationships in Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Southwest Karst Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Zhang, Yan & Wu, Tong & Song, Changsu & Hein, Lars & Shi, Faqi & Han, Mingchen & Ouyang, Zhiyun, 2022. "Influences of climate change and land use change on the interactions of ecosystem services in China’s Xijiang River Basin," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    3. Qiurong Xu & Ruipeng Li & Jia Yu & Pei Zhang, 2023. "Synergies and Trade-Offs among Different Ecosystem Services through the Analyses of Spatio-Temporal Changes in Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Xindong Du & Xiaoke Zhang & Huan Wang & Xiaojuan Zhi & Jianyuan Huang, 2020. "Assessing Green Space Potential Accessibility through Urban Artificial Building Data in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-11, November.
    5. Carlos Rosero & Xosé Otero & Cinthya Bravo & Catherine Frey, 2023. "Multitemporal Incidence of Landscape Fragmentation in a Protected Area of Central Andean Ecuador," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Dehuan Li & Wei Sun & Fan Xia & Yixuan Yang & Yujing Xie, 2021. "Can Habitat Quality Index Measured Using the InVEST Model Explain Variations in Bird Diversity in an Urban Area?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.
    7. Keyu Luo & Zhenyu Wang & Wei Sha & Jiansheng Wu & Hongliang Wang & Qingliang Zhu, 2021. "Integrating Sponge City Concept and Neural Network into Land Suitability Assessment: Evidence from a Satellite Town of Shenzhen Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Cheng He & Kangning Xiong & Yongkuan Chi & Shuzhen Song & Jinzhong Fang & Shuyu He, 2022. "Effects of Landscape Type Change on Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Ecological Assets in a Karst Plateau-Mountain Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Md. Omar Sarif & Rajan Dev Gupta, 2022. "Spatiotemporal mapping of Land Use/Land Cover dynamics using Remote Sensing and GIS approach: a case study of Prayagraj City, India (1988–2018)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 888-920, January.
    10. Hazem T. Abd El-Hamid & Hoda Nour-Eldin & Nazih Y. Rebouh & Ahmed M. El-Zeiny, 2022. "Past and Future Changes of Land Use/Land Cover and the Potential Impact on Ecosystem Services Value of Damietta Governorate, Egypt," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Kubiszewski, Ida & Concollato, Luke & Costanza, Robert & Stern, David I., 2023. "Changes in authorship, networks, and research topics in ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Jinjin Wu & Xueru Jin & Zhe Feng & Tianqian Chen & Chenxu Wang & Dingrao Feng & Jiaqi Lv, 2021. "Relationship of Ecosystem Services in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region Based on the Production Possibility Frontier," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Hui Li & Qing Xu & Huiyi Qiu & Jiaheng Du & Zhenzhou Xu & Longying Liu & Zixiu Zhao & Zixin Zhu & Yun He, 2024. "Study on Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Synergies in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area Based on Ecosystem Service Bundles," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, December.
    14. Yuyan Pan & Yanpeng Gao & Hongchang Qian, 2025. "Progressive Framework for Analyzing Driving Mechanisms of Ecosystem Services in Resource-Exhausted Cities: A Case Study of Fushun, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, April.
    15. Weixiang Ren & Xiaodong Wu & Xuguang Ge & Guiying Lin & Lian Feng & Wanqing Ma & Dan Xu, 2022. "Study on the Water Quality Characteristics of the Baoan Lake Basin in China under Different Land Use and Landscape Pattern Distributions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Haizhen Chen & Yi Chen & Xiaosong Chen & Xingzhong Zhang & Haowei Wu & Zhihui Li, 2022. "Impacts of Historical Land Use Changes on Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Junhui Shi & Fang Wang, 2022. "The Effect of High-Speed Rail on Cropland Abandonment in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    18. Yuxiang Yan & Xiaohuang Liu & Tao Lin & Peng Li & Jie Min & Ping Zhu & Xiaotong Liu & Chao Wang, 2025. "Analysis of the Interrelationships and Drivers of Ecosystem Services in the Heihe River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Yan, Jinming & Zhang, Dongsheng & Xia, Fangzhou, 2021. "Evaluation of village land use planning risks in green concepts: The case of Qiwangfen Village in Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    20. Sijing Ye & Changqing Song & Yakov Kuzyakov & Feng Cheng & Xiangbin Kong & Zhe Feng & Peichao Gao, 2022. "Preface: Arable Land Quality: Observation, Estimation, Optimization, and Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-5, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1046-:d:1144513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.