IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p9935-d452437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Green Space Potential Accessibility through Urban Artificial Building Data in Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xindong Du

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Xiaoke Zhang

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Huan Wang

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Xiaojuan Zhi

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Jianyuan Huang

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Abstract

Green spaces play an important role in improving the health and quality of life of urban residents, and environmental justice has become one of the most debated topics for scholars and governments in China. The accessibility of green space has been recognized as an effective method for the assessment of environmental justice. Population and green space are the two basic elements for evaluating green space accessibility. However, high-precision population data are difficult to obtain. To address this issue, we propose a straightforward method to assess green space accessibility using urban artificial building data and investigate how green space distribution is correlated with the population. Our analysis uses urban artificial building data and green space data from 2018 in Nanjing, China. The results show that the overall amount of green space, is not only very low, but also unevenly distributed. From the urban center to the city outskirts, the green space changed representing an M-shaped pattern, while the population sharply declined. Given the serious mismatch between the population and green space, only about 26.4% and 51.8% of Nanjing residents could access green space within 400 and 800 m, respectively, which was far below that in cities in developed countries. For residents’ wellbeing, governments must consider increasing green space provision and promoting equal access.

Suggested Citation

  • Xindong Du & Xiaoke Zhang & Huan Wang & Xiaojuan Zhi & Jianyuan Huang, 2020. "Assessing Green Space Potential Accessibility through Urban Artificial Building Data in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:9935-:d:452437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9935/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9935/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rimal, Bhagawat & Sharma, Roshan & Kunwar, Ripu & Keshtkar, Hamidreza & Stork, Nigel E. & Rijal, Sushila & Rahman, Syed Ajijur & Baral, Himlal, 2019. "Effects of land use and land cover change on ecosystem services in the Koshi River Basin, Eastern Nepal," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Xiangzheng Deng & Jikun Huang & Scott Rozelle & Emi Uchida, 2010. "Economic Growth and the Expansion of Urban Land in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(4), pages 813-843, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wudong Zhao & Liwei Zhang & Xupu Li & Lixian Peng & Pengtao Wang & Zhuangzhuang Wang & Lei Jiao & Hao Wang, 2022. "Residents’ Preference for Urban Green Space Types and Their Ecological-Social Services in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. José Marín-Nicolás & Mª Paz Sáez-Pérez & Francesco Tajani & Francesco Sica, 2023. "Analysis of the Accessibility Improvement Index in Urban Areas through Heritage Buildings Used as Museums—Case Studies in the Region of Murcia (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Yingxue Rao & Yi Zhong & Qingsong He & Jingyi Dai, 2022. "Assessing the Equity of Accessibility to Urban Green Space: A Study of 254 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Bohong Zheng & Francis Masrabaye & Gerald Madjissembaye Guiradoumngué & Jian Zheng & Linlin Liu, 2021. "Progress in Research on Sustainable Urban Renewal Since 2000: Library and Visual Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Qingchang He & Andras Reith, 2022. "(Re)Defining Restorative and Regenerative Urban Design and Their Relation to UNSDGs—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-29, December.
    6. Shirley Kempeneer & Michaël Peeters & Tine Compernolle, 2021. "Bringing the User Back in the Building: An Analysis of ESG in Real Estate and a Behavioral Framework to Guide Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.
    7. Justyna Rubaszek & Janusz Gubański & Anna Podolska, 2023. "Do We Need Public Green Spaces Accessibility Standards for the Sustainable Development of Urban Settlements? The Evidence from Wrocław, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zheng, Xian, 2020. "Land use regulation and urban land value: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Bingkui Qiu & Shasha Lu & Min Zhou & Lu Zhang & Yu Deng & Ci Song & Zuo Zhang, 2015. "A Hybrid Inexact Optimization Method for Land-Use Allocation in Association with Environmental/Ecological Requirements at a Watershed Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Siyi Chen & Zhigang Chen & Yan Shen, 2021. "Can improving law enforcement effectively curb illegal land use in China?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Shasha Lu & Xingliang Guan & Chao He & Jiali Zhang, 2014. "Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Policy Implications of Urban Land Expansion in Metropolitan Areas: A Case Study of Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Su, Baozhong & Li, Yuheng & Li, Lequn & Wang, Yue, 2018. "How does nonfarm employment stability influence farmers' farmland transfer decisions? Implications for China’s land use policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 66-72.
    6. Wu, Rong & Li, Yingcheng & Wang, Shaojian, 2022. "Will the construction of high-speed rail accelerate urban land expansion? Evidences from Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Tuan Nguyen Tran, 2024. "Comparing the process of converting land use purposes between socio-economic regions in Vietnam from 2007 to 2020," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 51-62.
    8. Sèna Donalde Dolorès Marguerite Deguenon & Castro Gbêmêmali Hounmenou & Richard Adade & Oscar Teka & Ismaila Imorou Toko & Denis Worlanyo Aheto & Brice Sinsin, 2023. "Simulation of the Impacts of Sea-Level Rise on Coastal Ecosystems in Benin Using a Combined Approach of Machine Learning and the Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Zhang, Yan & Wu, Tong & Song, Changsu & Hein, Lars & Shi, Faqi & Han, Mingchen & Ouyang, Zhiyun, 2022. "Influences of climate change and land use change on the interactions of ecosystem services in China’s Xijiang River Basin," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    10. Ming Li & Yongwang Cao & Jin Dai & Jianxin Song & Mengyin Liang, 2025. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Expansion and Its Driving Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Hao Su & Shuo Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    12. Zuocheng Chen & Krishna P. Paudel, 2021. "Economic openness, government efficiency, and urbanization," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 1351-1372, August.
    13. Carlos Rosero & Xosé Otero & Cinthya Bravo & Catherine Frey, 2023. "Multitemporal Incidence of Landscape Fragmentation in a Protected Area of Central Andean Ecuador," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Dehuan Li & Wei Sun & Fan Xia & Yixuan Yang & Yujing Xie, 2021. "Can Habitat Quality Index Measured Using the InVEST Model Explain Variations in Bird Diversity in an Urban Area?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.
    15. Bo Zhou & Xiaofei Hu & Changsheng Xiong, 2023. "Differential Influences of High-Speed Railway Stations on the Surrounding Construction Land Expansion and Institutional Analysis: The Case of Taiwan and Hainan," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Shu, Cheng & Xie, Hualin & Jiang, Jinfa & Chen, Qianru, 2018. "Is Urban Land Development Driven by Economic Development or Fiscal Revenue Stimuli in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 107-115.
    17. Zheng, Dan & Shi, Minjun, 2018. "Industrial land policy, firm heterogeneity and firm location choice: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 58-67.
    18. Sali, Guido, 2012. "Agricultural Land Consumption in Developed Countries," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126431, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Yixin Chen & Bingyang Lyu & Guangrong Ma, 2024. "Revenue sharing, fiscal incentives, and economic growth: Evidence from China," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(1), pages 149-183, February.
    20. Chuai, Xiaowei & Gao, Runyi & Huang, Xianjin & Lu, Qinli & Zhao, Rongqin, 2021. "The embodied flow of built-up land in China's interregional trade and its implications for regional carbon balance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:9935-:d:452437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.