IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p396-d1054566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation for Water and Land Resources System Efficiency and Influencing Factors in China: A Two-Stage Network DEA Model

Author

Listed:
  • Cong Liu

    (Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Wenlai Jiang

    (Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Yang Liu

    (Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Yunfei Liu

    (Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Improving the water and land resource system efficiency can effectively alleviate the severe situation of water and land resources in China. Through the two-stage network DEA model, spatial autocorrelation analysis, multiple linear regression, and geographic weighted regression analysis, this paper revealed the change characteristics, distribution types, spatial correlation relationship, and main driving factors of China’s water and land resources system efficiency. The results show that the water and land resources system efficiency fluctuates widely in different regions. Water and land resources systems in nearly half of the provinces belong to the high development, low economic benefit transformation type, mainly distributed in southwestern and northwestern China. The economic benefit transformation is becoming the weak link of water and land resources system. The overall efficiency of water and land resource system has significant spatial positive correlation, and this correlation has an increasing trend. Low-Low Clusters occupy more provinces. The urbanization level, population density, proportion of output value of secondary and tertiary industries, and effective irrigation all have a positive impact on the overall efficiency of water and land resources system. The impact of the proportion of construction land is bidirectional and the per land pesticide application has negative impact in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Cong Liu & Wenlai Jiang & Yang Liu & Yunfei Liu, 2023. "Evaluation for Water and Land Resources System Efficiency and Influencing Factors in China: A Two-Stage Network DEA Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:396-:d:1054566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/396/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/396/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Hualin & Chen, Qianru & Lu, Fucai & Wu, Qing & Wang, Wei, 2018. "Spatial-temporal disparities, saving potential and influential factors of industrial land use efficiency: A case study in urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 518-529.
    2. Zhou, Yan & Huang, Xianjin & Zhong, Taiyang & Chen, Yi & Yang, Hong & Chen, Zhigang & Xu, Guoliang & Niu, Lede & Li, Hehui, 2020. "Can annual land use plan control and regulate construction land growth in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Kao, Chiang & Hwang, Shiuh-Nan, 2008. "Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 418-429, February.
    4. Lorenzo Castelli & Raffaele Pesenti & Walter Ukovich, 2010. "A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the Decision Making Units is considered," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 207-235, January.
    5. Zinabu Wolde & Wu Wei & Haile Ketema & Eshetu Yirsaw & Habtamu Temesegn, 2021. "Indicators of Land, Water, Energy and Food (LWEF) Nexus Resource Drivers: A Perspective on Environmental Degradation in the Gidabo Watershed, Southern Ethiopia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Changchun Tan & Qinhong Peng & Tao Ding & Zhixiang Zhou, 2021. "Regional Assessment of Land and Water Carrying Capacity and Utilization Efficiency in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Junfeng Yang & Kun Lei & Soonthiam Khu & Wei Meng, 2015. "Assessment of Water Resources Carrying Capacity for Sustainable Development Based on a System Dynamics Model: A Case Study of Tieling City, China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(3), pages 885-899, February.
    8. Yujiao Zhou & Weifeng Li & Huihui Li & Zhen Wang & Bei Zhang & Kaiyang Zhong, 2022. "Impact of Water and Land Resources Matching on Agricultural Sustainable Economic Growth: Empirical Analysis with Spatial Spillover Effects from Yellow River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, February.
    9. Wang, Ya & Pan, Jiao-feng & Pei, Rui-min & Yi, Bo-Wen & Yang, Guo-liang, 2020. "Assessing the technological innovation efficiency of China's high-tech industries with a two-stage network DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Hang Yu & Chaofeng Shao & Xiaojun Wang & Chunxu Hao, 2022. "Transformation Path of Ecological Product Value and Efficiency Evaluation: The Case of the Qilihai Wetland in Tianjin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-22, November.
    11. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2009. "Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 243-252, August.
    12. Zha, Yong & Liang, Liang, 2010. "Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 332-338, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. AGRELL, Per & HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel, 2011. "Frontier-based performance analysis models for supply chain management; state of the art and research directions," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2011069, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Tatiana Bencova & Andrea Bohacikova, 2022. "DEA in Performance Measurement of Two-Stage Processes: Comparative Overview of the Literature," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 111-129.
    3. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    4. Yongqi Feng & Haolin Zhang & Yung-ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2021. "Innovation efficiency and the impact of the institutional quality: a cross-country analysis using the two-stage meta-frontier dynamic network DEA model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3091-3129, April.
    5. Ang, Sheng & Liu, Pei & Yang, Feng, 2020. "Intra-Organizational and inter-organizational resource allocation in two-stage network systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Kao, Chiang, 2016. "Efficiency decomposition and aggregation in network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 778-786.
    7. Khoveyni, Mohammad & Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Eslami, Robabeh & Yang, Guo-liang, 2019. "Variations effect of intermediate products on the second stage in two-stage processes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 35-48.
    8. S. Lozano & G. Villa, 2019. "Data envelopment analysis of systems with multiple modes of functioning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 17-41, July.
    9. Peykani, Pejman & Seyed Esmaeili, Fatemeh Sadat & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, Mohsen & Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, Farhad, 2024. "Matrix-based network data envelopment analysis: A common set of weights approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Tsung-Sheng Chang & Kaoru Tone & Quanling Wei, 2014. "Ownership-specified network DEA models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 214(1), pages 73-98, March.
    11. Wang, Ya & Pan, Jiao-feng & Pei, Rui-min & Yi, Bo-Wen & Yang, Guo-liang, 2020. "Assessing the technological innovation efficiency of China's high-tech industries with a two-stage network DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    12. Chen, Ya & Li, Yongjun & Liang, Liang & Salo, Ahti & Wu, Huaqing, 2016. "Frontier projection and efficiency decomposition in two-stage processes with slacks-based measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 543-554.
    13. Suvvari Anandarao & S. Raja Sethu Durai & Phanindra Goyari, 2019. "Efficiency Decomposition in two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis: An application to Life Insurance companies in India," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(2), pages 271-285, June.
    14. Sánchez-González, Carlos & Sarto, José Luis & Vicente, Luis, 2017. "The efficiency of mutual fund companies: Evidence from an innovative network SBM approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 114-128.
    15. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2016. "Research fronts in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    16. Tavakoli, Ibrahim M. & Mostafaee, Amin, 2019. "Free disposal hull efficiency scores of units with network structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1027-1036.
    17. Chen, Zhongfei & Wanke, Peter & Antunes, Jorge Junio Moreira & Zhang, Ning, 2017. "Chinese airline efficiency under CO2 emissions and flight delays: A stochastic network DEA model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 89-108.
    18. Lívia Torres & Francisco S. Ramos, 2024. "Allocating Benefits Due to Shared Resources Using Shapley Value and Nucleolus in Dynamic Network Data Envelopment Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Jie Wu & Beibei Xiong & Qingxian An & Jiasen Sun & Huaqing Wu, 2017. "Total-factor energy efficiency evaluation of Chinese industry by using two-stage DEA model with shared inputs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 255(1), pages 257-276, August.
    20. Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Mirdehghan, S.M., 2012. "Identifying the efficiency status in network DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 85-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:396-:d:1054566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.