IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p279-d1040190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Index Approach for Analysis of Urban Green Infrastructure in Himalayan Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Mangalasseril Mohammad Anees

    (Spatial Analysis and Informatics Lab (SAIL), School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India
    UFZ—Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, 04318 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Ellen Banzhaf

    (UFZ—Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, 04318 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Jingxia Wang

    (Department of Urban Studies and Planning, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK)

  • Pawan Kumar Joshi

    (Spatial Analysis and Informatics Lab (SAIL), School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India
    Special Centre for Disaster Research, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India)

Abstract

In fast urbanizing cities, fragmentation of urban green infrastructure (UGI) commonly arises due to lack of efficient planning to maintain the quantity and improve their quality. As ecological processes and landscape patterns are closely intertwined, it is a prerequisite to investigate landscape structure when aiming at better provision of ecosystem services. This study integrates remote sensing, geographic information system, combination of landscape metrics, and multi-variated statistics to delineate structural attributes influencing UGI Quality (UGIQ). We exemplify our methodology in three capital cities of Indian Himalayan states at administrative ward level. The UGIQ is derived by comparing landscape characters defined by nine metrics denoting area, shape, and aggregation attributes. By employing principal component analysis (PCA) and multi-collinearity diagnosis, a set of quality defining metrics are obtained for each city. Further, to gain insightful spatial basis for improving connectivity, Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis (MSPA) is used to visualize and classify patches into seven morphological classes. Landscape characterization highlights a pattern of low-quality wards having a limited number and area of UGI patches in urban centers, and high-quality wards with complex and aggregated patches towards fringes. PCA identifies the positive influence of area (LPI, AREA_MN) and shape (LSI, FRAC_AM, CONTIG) metrics and negative influence of patch distance (ENN_MN) and fragmentation (PD) on UGIQ in different combinations across the cities. Higher shares of morphological core and edge classes are recognized for overall UGIQ improvement. The results provide quantitative measures to develop integrated spatial planning strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mangalasseril Mohammad Anees & Ellen Banzhaf & Jingxia Wang & Pawan Kumar Joshi, 2023. "Quality Index Approach for Analysis of Urban Green Infrastructure in Himalayan Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:279-:d:1040190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Connop, Stuart & Vandergert, Paula & Eisenberg, Bernd & Collier, Marcus J. & Nash, Caroline & Clough, Jack & Newport, Darryl, 2016. "Renaturing cities using a regionally-focused biodiversity-led multifunctional benefits approach to urban green infrastructure," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 99-111.
    2. Jonathan M. Chase & Shane A. Blowes & Tiffany M. Knight & Katharina Gerstner & Felix May, 2020. "Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss," Nature, Nature, vol. 584(7820), pages 238-243, August.
    3. Lausch, Angela & Blaschke, Thomas & Haase, Dagmar & Herzog, Felix & Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe & Tischendorf, Lutz & Walz, Ulrich, 2015. "Understanding and quantifying landscape structure – A review on relevant process characteristics, data models and landscape metrics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 31-41.
    4. Karsten Rusche & Mario Reimer & Rico Stichmann, 2019. "Mapping and Assessing Green Infrastructure Connectivity in European City Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martina Venturi & Francesco Piras & Federica Corrieri & Beatrice Fiore & Antonio Santoro & Mauro Agnoletti, 2021. "Assessment of Tuscany Landscape Structure According to the Regional Landscape Plan Partition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Xifan Chen & Lihua Xu & Rusong Zhu & Qiwei Ma & Yijun Shi & Zhangwei Lu, 2022. "Changes and Characteristics of Green Infrastructure Network Based on Spatio-Temporal Priority," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Nausheen Masood & Alessio Russo, 2023. "Community Perception of Brownfield Regeneration through Urban Rewilding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Jin Su & Mo Wang & Mohd Adib Mohammad Razi & Norlida Mohd Dom & Noralfishah Sulaiman & Lai-Wai Tan, 2023. "A Bibliometric Review of Nature-Based Solutions on Urban Stormwater Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Šťastná Milada & Vaishar Antonín & Vavrouchová Hana & Ševelová Miloslava & Kozlovská Silvie & Doskočilová Veronika & Lincová Helena, 2015. "Changes Of A Rural Landscape In Czech Areas Of Different Types," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 111-133, June.
    7. Troxler, David & Zabel, Astrid & Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne, 2023. "Identifying drivers of forest clearances in Switzerland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Angioletta Voghera & Benedetta Giudice, 2019. "Evaluating and Planning Green Infrastructure: A Strategic Perspective for Sustainability and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Alexander E. Cagle & Alona Armstrong & Giles Exley & Steven M. Grodsky & Jordan Macknick & John Sherwin & Rebecca R. Hernandez, 2020. "The Land Sparing, Water Surface Use Efficiency, and Water Surface Transformation of Floating Photovoltaic Solar Energy Installations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Marika Tomasi & Sara Favargiotti & Martina van Lierop & Lorenzo Giovannini & Andrea Zonato, 2021. "Verona Adapt. Modelling as a Planning Instrument: Applying a Climate-Responsive Approach in Verona, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-28, June.
    11. Francesco Piras & Beatrice Fiore & Antonio Santoro, 2022. "Small Cultural Forests: Landscape Role and Ecosystem Services in a Japanese Cultural Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Nandor Csikos & Malte Schwanebeck & Michael Kuhwald & Peter Szilassi & Rainer Duttmann, 2019. "Density of Biogas Power Plants as An Indicator of Bioenergy Generated Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Renato Monteiro & José C. Ferreira & Paula Antunes, 2020. "Green Infrastructure Planning Principles: An Integrated Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Diana Dushkova & Dagmar Haase, 2020. "Not Simply Green: Nature-Based Solutions as a Concept and Practical Approach for Sustainability Studies and Planning Agendas in Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-37, January.
    15. Gackstetter, David & von Bloh, Malte & Hannus, Veronika & Meyer, Sebastian T. & Weisser, Wolfgang & Luksch, Claudia & Asseng, Senthold, 2023. "Autonomous field management – An enabler of sustainable future in agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    16. Xiaoping Zhou & Duanshuai Shen & Xiaokun Gu, 2022. "Influences of Land Policy on Urban Ecological Corridors Governance: A Case Study from Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Miguel Amado & Evelina Rodrigues & Francesca Poggi & Manuel Duarte Pinheiro & António Ribeiro Amado & Helder José, 2020. "Using Different Levels of Information in Planning Green Infrastructure in Luanda, Angola," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, April.
    18. Rob Swart & Wim Timmermans & Eva Boon & Maarten Van Ginkel & Hasse Goosen & Felix Van Veldhoven & Jua Cilliers & Emeka Ndaguba, 2023. "Can Managing Climate Risks Be a Catalyst for Broader Transformative Change?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Judy Bush & Gavin Ashley & Ben Foster & Gail Hall, 2021. "Integrating Green Infrastructure into Urban Planning: Developing Melbourne’s Green Factor Tool," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 20-31.
    20. Khara Grieger & Christopher L. Cummings, 2022. "Informing environmental health and risk priorities through local outreach and extension," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 388-401, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:279-:d:1040190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.