IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p1014-d1650617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Global to Local: Implementing Nature-Based Solutions in Cultural Value Protection for Sustainable Village Development

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Luo

    (School of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
    Fujian Key Laboratory of Digital Technology for Territorial Space Analysis and Simulation, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Yanhan Chen

    (School of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
    Fujian Key Laboratory of Digital Technology for Territorial Space Analysis and Simulation, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Xiaojing Chen

    (Natural Resources Bureau of Xingguo County, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Shaoping Hong

    (School of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
    Fujian Key Laboratory of Digital Technology for Territorial Space Analysis and Simulation, Fuzhou 350108, China)

Abstract

Nature-based Solutions (NbSs) bridge ecological conservation and human well-being. As the concept gains global traction, its potential for cultural heritage preservation is drawing increasing interest. This study explores the localized application of NbSs in Chinese villages, focusing on two core questions: its compatibility with traditional Chinese construction wisdom and its practical pathways for localization. A literature review reveals strong theoretical alignment between NbS principles and indigenous building practices. This study develops a dual quantitative framework—comprising an NbS evaluation system and a cultural value assessment system—for coupling coordination analysis. Results show a strong interdependence between the integration of NbS principles and village cultural value, with traditional villages (0.7806) achieving a better balance between ecological protection and cultural heritage than non-traditional villages (0.5953), validating the alignment of global NbS principles with local building wisdom. Based on gray relational analysis, disaster risk management and local governance are identified as key NbS dimensions shaping cultural integrity and knowledge continuity. An integrated indicator system combining ecological and cultural metrics is proposed. This study confirms the alignment between global principles and local wisdom, offering an NbS localization framework with insights for heritage conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Luo & Yanhan Chen & Xiaojing Chen & Shaoping Hong, 2025. "From Global to Local: Implementing Nature-Based Solutions in Cultural Value Protection for Sustainable Village Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1014-:d:1650617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1014/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1014/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shanwen Zheng & Baolong Han & Dang Wang & Zhiyun Ouyang, 2018. "Ecological Wisdom and Inspiration Underlying the Planning and Construction of Ancient Human Settlements: Case Study of Hongcun UNESCO World Heritage Site in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Lin, Boqiang & Wang, You, 2024. "How does the natural disasters affect urban-rural income gap? Empirical evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    3. Diandian Hao & Ziyi Yan & Yanan Wang & Bowen Wang, 2022. "Effect of Village Informal Institutions and Cadre-Mass Relationship for Farmers’ Participation in Rural Residential Environment Governance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Boyu Wang & Huimin Yan & Zhichao Xue & Batunacun & Guihuan Liu, 2022. "Nature-Based Solutions Benefit the Economic–Ecological Coordination of Pastoral Areas: An Outstanding Herdsman’s Experience in Xilin Gol, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Ning DongGe & Jinbiao Yan & Peilin Liu & Martin van den Toorn & Albert Fekete, 2022. "Historical Water Management Strategies—Case Study of Traditional Villages in Southern China, Hunan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Karsten Rusche & Mario Reimer & Rico Stichmann, 2019. "Mapping and Assessing Green Infrastructure Connectivity in European City Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, March.
    7. Kuang-Chung Lee & Paulina G. Karimova & Shao-Yu Yan & Yee-Shien Li, 2020. "Resilience Assessment Workshops: A Biocultural Approach to Conservation Management of a Rural Landscape in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Claudia de Luca & Sandra Naumann & McKenna Davis & Simona Tondelli, 2021. "Nature-Based Solutions and Sustainable Urban Planning in the European Environmental Policy Framework: Analysis of the State of the Art and Recommendations for Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    9. Ameneh Mianabadi & Kamran Davary & Mahdi Kolahi & Judith Fisher, 2022. "Water/climate nexus environmental rural-urban migration and coping strategies," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(5), pages 852-876, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gulay Cetinkaya Ciftcioglu, 2025. "Tackling the resilience of the olive landscape through nature-based solutions: a case study from the Akdeniz protected area of Northern Cyprus," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 1-19, June.
    2. František Petrovič & Martin Boltižiar & Iveta Rakytová & Ivana Tomčíková & Eva Pauditšová, 2021. "Long-Term Development Trend of the Historical Cultural Landscape of the UNESCO Monument: Vlkolínec (Slovakia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Zhengxu Zhou & Ziyu Jia & Nian Wang & Ming Fang, 2018. "Sustainable Mountain Village Construction Adapted to Livelihood, Topography, and Hydrology: A Case of Dong Villages in Southeast Guizhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Ludwig Paul B. Cabling & Kristian L. Dubrawski & Maleea Acker & Gregg Brill, 2024. "Harnessing Community Science to Support Implementation and Success of Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Renato Monteiro & José C. Ferreira & Paula Antunes, 2020. "Green Infrastructure Planning Principles: An Integrated Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Rosyi Damayanti T. Manningtyas & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Traditional Ecological Knowledge versus Ecological Wisdom: Are They Dissimilar in Cultural Landscape Research?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Jose-Manuel Almodovar-Melendo & Joseph-Maria Cabeza-Lainez, 2018. "Environmental Features of Chinese Architectural Heritage: The Standardization of Form in the Pursuit of Equilibrium with Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Carmela Mariano & Francesca Rossi, 2023. "RivEr/Generation_LAB-Linking Resilience with Inclusiveness in the Urban-Built Environment of Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Miguel Amado & Evelina Rodrigues & Francesca Poggi & Manuel Duarte Pinheiro & António Ribeiro Amado & Helder José, 2020. "Using Different Levels of Information in Planning Green Infrastructure in Luanda, Angola," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, April.
    10. Aram Min & Ji-Hyun Lee, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework for the Externalization of Ecological Wisdom: The Case of Traditional Korean Gardens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Yunhui Yang & Keyu Bai & Guanhua Li & Devra I. Jarvis & Chunlin Long, 2020. "Assessment of the Resilience in SEPLS (Socio-Ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes) in Yanuo Village, Xishuangbanna, Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Yuan Sun & Zhu Wang & Yuan Zheng, 2022. "Environmental Adaptations for Achieving Sustainable Regeneration: A Conceptual Design Analysis on Built Heritage Fujian Tulous," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Dohee Kim & Wonhyeop Shin & Heejoon Choi & Jihwan Kim & Youngkeun Song, 2020. "Estimation of Ecological Connectivity in a City Based on Land Cover and Urban Habitat Maps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Yangluxi Li & Lei Chen & Li Yang, 2023. "CFD Modelling and Analysis for Green Environment of Traditional Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Juanjo Galan & Felix Bourgeau & Bas Pedroli, 2020. "A Multidimensional Model for the Vernacular: Linking Disciplines and Connecting the Vernacular Landscape to Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Elie Hanna & Francisco A. Comín, 2021. "Urban Green Infrastructure and Sustainable Development: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Carlo Pisano, 2020. "Strategies for Post-COVID Cities: An Insight to Paris En Commun and Milano 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, July.
    18. Mangalasseril Mohammad Anees & Ellen Banzhaf & Jingxia Wang & Pawan Kumar Joshi, 2023. "Quality Index Approach for Analysis of Urban Green Infrastructure in Himalayan Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Naji Akbar & Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & Adel Saleh Bouregh, 2020. "Fostering Urban Sustainability through the Ecological Wisdom of Traditional Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1014-:d:1650617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.