IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1490-d907276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivism and Post-Productivism: An Analysis of Functional Mixtures in Rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Yaofu Huang

    (School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
    China Regional Coordinated Development and Rural Construction Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

  • Luan Chen

    (School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
    China Regional Coordinated Development and Rural Construction Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

  • Xun Li

    (School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
    China Regional Coordinated Development and Rural Construction Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

Abstract

Existing studies have attempted to explain the transformation of rural China from a single productive or post-productive perspective. However, regarding the two development paradigms as binary opposites brings contradictions: Is China’s countryside evolving towards productivism or post-productivism? To answer this question, we transcend the binary opposition and instead propose an analytical framework based on rural value, driving actors, and rural land-use functions. Based on the location quotient analysis method, we measure the functional hybridity of rural areas using 7345 POIs (points of interest) representing the land-use types of productive and post-productive activities. We discuss the formation mechanism of functional hybridity considering two typical spaces: modern agriculture demonstration districts and “ Tesecun ”. We find that the government, the market, and villagers collectively promote the formation of functional hybridity in rural China. The government prefers to strengthen productivity in order to ensure state food security, while villagers prefer to make their villages more multi-functional in order to attract citizens. This study can be seen as a contribution supplementing research issues associated with rural China from the novel dualistic perspective of productivism and post-productivism.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaofu Huang & Luan Chen & Xun Li, 2022. "Productivism and Post-Productivism: An Analysis of Functional Mixtures in Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1490-:d:907276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1490/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1490/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clive Potter & Matt Lobley, 1996. "The Farm Family Life Cycle, Succession Paths And Environmental Change In Britain'S Countryside," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 172-190, January.
    2. Mingjie Wang & Bin Yu & Rongrong Zhuo & Zhuofan Li, 2022. "A Geographic Analysis on Rural Reconstruction-Transformation-Revitalization: A Case Study of Jianghan Plain in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Wei Li & Yang Zhou & Zhanwei Zhang, 2021. "Culture-Led Plan for Peri-Urban Agricultural Sustainability: A Case of Pu’an Village in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-10, March.
    4. Nicola Livingstone & Nick Gallent & Iqbal Hamiduddin & Meri Juntti & Phoebe Stirling, 2021. "Beyond Agriculture: Alternative Geographies of Rural Land Investment and Place Effects across the United Kingdom," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Mingxing Chen & Yuan Zhou & Xinrong Huang & Chao Ye, 2021. "The Integration of New-Type Urbanization and Rural Revitalization Strategies in China: Origin, Reality and Future Trends," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Wu, Bin & Liu, Linghui, 2020. "Social capital for rural revitalization in China: A critical evaluation on the government’s new countryside programme in Chengdu," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shiqi Liu & Yi Guan & Wangda Chen & Zhenwei Peng, 2023. "The Transformation of Rural Areas Located in China’s Agricultural Heritage Systems under the Evolution of Urban–Rural Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-25, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elias Giannakis & Sophia Efstratoglou & Artemis Antoniades, 2018. "Off-Farm Employment and Economic Crisis: Evidence from Cyprus," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Yuqi Zhu & Siwei Shen & Linyu Du & Jun Fu & Jian Zou & Lina Peng & Rui Ding, 2023. "Spatial and Temporal Interaction Coupling of Digital Economy, New-Type Urbanization and Land Ecology and Spatial Effects Identification: A Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Longjiao Wen & Zhenzhen Liu & Zhifeng Gao & Saeid Khanjari, 2022. "Evolutionary Path and Mechanism of Village Revitalization: A Case Study of Yuejin Village, Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Ruishan Chen & Chao Ye, 2022. "Land Perspectives: People, Tenure, Planning, Tools, Space, and Health," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-5, February.
    5. Jane Mills & Hannah Chiswell & Peter Gaskell & Paul Courtney & Beth Brockett & George Cusworth & Matt Lobley, 2021. "Developing Farm-Level Social Indicators for Agri-Environment Schemes: A Focus on the Agents of Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Jane Mills & Peter Gaskell & Julie Ingram & Janet Dwyer & Matt Reed & Christopher Short, 2017. "Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(2), pages 283-299, June.
    7. Neslihan Beden & Nazire Göksu Soydan-Oksal & Sema Arıman & Hayatullah Ahmadzai, 2023. "Delineation of a Groundwater Potential Zone Map for the Kızılırmak Delta by Using Remote-Sensing-Based Geospatial and Analytical Hierarchy Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Youxu Zheng & Jiangdi Tan & Yaping Huang & Zhiyong Wang, 2022. "The Governance Path of Urban–Rural Integration in Changing Urban–Rural Relationships in the Metropolitan Area: A Case Study of Wuhan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Kristensen, Søren Bech Pilgaard & Busck, Anne Gravsholt & van der Sluis, Theo & Gaube, Veronika, 2016. "Patterns and drivers of farm-level land use change in selected European rural landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 786-799.
    10. Stefan Mann, 2021. "Synthesizing Knowledge about Structural Change in Agriculture: The Integration of Disciplines and Aggregation Levels," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Xuefeng Hou & Dianfeng Zhang & Liyuan Fu & Fu Zeng & Qing Wang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Coupling Coordination Degree between Urban–Rural Integration and Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-26, June.
    12. Yanyu Wang & Robert Tian, 2023. "Development of Rural Regions in China: Evidence of Industry Integration by the Residents of Yongan Village (Quanzhou City, China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Chuanming Sun & Guoxin Tan & Xingyu Chai & Haiqing Zhang, 2023. "Analysis on the Satisfaction of Public Cultural Service by Township Residents: A Qualitative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    14. Zhoufu Yan & Lewei Peng & Xiao Wu, 2023. "Evaluation System for Agricultural and Rural Modernization in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Crockett, Judith, 2004. "The nature of farm succession in three New South Wales communities," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 1, pages 1-13.
    16. Davis, John & Caskie, Paul & Wallace, Michael, 2013. "Promoting structural adjustment in agriculture: The economics of New Entrant Schemes for farmers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 90-96.
    17. Leng Liu & Congjie Cao & Wei Song, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis in the Field of Rural Revitalization: Current Status, Progress, and Prospects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Ran Li & Liang Mao, 2022. "Spatial Characteristics of Suburban Villages Based on Spatial Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Wei Zhao & Changjun Jiang, 2022. "Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Characteristics and Dynamic Effects of Urban-Rural Integration Development in the Yangtze River Delta Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Bin Liao, 2024. "Does New Urbanization Promote Urban Metabolic Efficiency?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1490-:d:907276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.