IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i8p1258-d882105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and Optimization on Urban Regeneration Sustainability from the Perspective of Multidimensional Welfare of Resettled Resident—Evidence from Resettlement Communities in Xi’an, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yulin Zhou

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
    Research Center of Green Development and Mechanism Innovation of Real Estate Industry in Shaanxi Province, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Lulu Wei

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
    Research Center of Green Development and Mechanism Innovation of Real Estate Industry in Shaanxi Province, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Feng Lan

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
    Research Center of Green Development and Mechanism Innovation of Real Estate Industry in Shaanxi Province, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Xiang Li

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
    Research Center of Green Development and Mechanism Innovation of Real Estate Industry in Shaanxi Province, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Jing Bian

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
    Research Center of Green Development and Mechanism Innovation of Real Estate Industry in Shaanxi Province, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

Abstract

Urban regeneration is an important means for building sustainable cities and implementing China’s high-quality development strategy. In this paper, a sustainable regeneration PSR (Pressure-State-Response) model was established, and a state-layer evaluation model was constructed based on the perspective of resettled residents’ multidimensional welfare. Through questionnaire surveys with 210 centralized resettled households in Xi’an, China, the changes in the living conditions of resettled residents before and after the centralized resettlement were measured, the differentiation in individual changes were explored, and the sustainability of urban regeneration was evaluated, so as to optimize the sustainability of urban regeneration. The results show that, before and after urban regeneration, the changes at the state layer are not obvious on the whole. The sharp decline of social dimension welfare indicates that urban regeneration generates some new pressures while alleviating the imbalance of social development, and at the response layer, there is not sufficient attention to the residents’ emotions at the social level. Changes in the state layer are different due to individual characteristics, but there is no matching differentiated response to maintain the stability of the state. The research results are of great significance for optimizing residents’ welfare and solving the problems of sustainable regeneration from the perspective of humanistic welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulin Zhou & Lulu Wei & Feng Lan & Xiang Li & Jing Bian, 2022. "Evaluation and Optimization on Urban Regeneration Sustainability from the Perspective of Multidimensional Welfare of Resettled Resident—Evidence from Resettlement Communities in Xi’an, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1258-:d:882105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1258/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1258/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mee Ng, 2005. "Quality of Life Perceptions and Directions for Urban Regeneration in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 441-465, March.
    2. Christopher J. Bennett & Shabana Mitra, 2013. "Multidimensional Poverty: Measurement, Estimation, and Inference," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 57-83, January.
    3. Stefan Bouzarovski & Jan Frankowski & Sergio Tirado Herrero, 2018. "Low‐Carbon Gentrification: When Climate Change Encounters Residential Displacement," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5), pages 845-863, September.
    4. Katie Williams & Carol Dair, 2007. "A framework for assessing the sustainability of brownfield developments," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(1), pages 23-40.
    5. Amartya Sen, 2004. "Capabilities, Lists, And Public Reason: Continuing The Conversation," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 77-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Megan Devonald & Nicola Jones & Sally Youssef, 2022. "‘We Have No Hope for Anything’: Exploring Interconnected Economic, Social and Environmental Risks to Adolescents in Lebanon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Leonie C. Steckermeier, 2021. "The Value of Autonomy for the Good Life. An Empirical Investigation of Autonomy and Life Satisfaction in Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 693-723, April.
    3. Taozhi Zhuang & Queena K. Qian & Henk J. Visscher & Marja G. Elsinga, 2017. "Stakeholders’ Expectations in Urban Renewal Projects in China: A Key Step towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    4. James Foster, Christopher Handy, 2008. "External Capabilities," OPHI Working Papers 8, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    5. Koutra, Sesil & Bouillard, Philippe & Becue, Vincent & Cenci, Jeremy & Zhang, Jiazhen, 2023. "From ‘brown’ to ‘bright’: Key issues and challenges in former industrialized areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    6. Antoinette Baujard & Muriel Gilardone, 2017. "Sen is not a capability theorist," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Martin Binder & Tom Broekel, 2011. "Applying a Non-parametric Efficiency Analysis to Measure Conversion Efficiency in Great Britain," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 257-281.
    8. Sarkar Shubhabrata & Bairagya Ramsundar, 2013. "Counting Multidimensional Poverty as Per Alkire And Foster Methodology- A Case Study Of Two Villages Of Sundarban Area Of West Bengal, India," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 37-50.
    9. Daniel Nowak & Christoph Scheicher, 2017. "Considering the Extremely Poor: Multidimensional Poverty Measurement for Germany," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 139-162, August.
    10. Pelenc, Jérôme & Etxano, Iker, 2021. "Capabilities, Ecosystem Services, and Strong Sustainability through SMCE: The Case of Haren (Belgium)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Kaspar Walter Meili & Anna Månsdotter & Linda Richter Sundberg & Jan Hjelte & Lars Lindholm, 2022. "An initiative to develop capability-adjusted life years in Sweden (CALY-SWE): Selecting capabilities with a Delphi panel and developing the questionnaire," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Roberta Sferrazzo & Renato Ruffini, 2021. "Are Liberated Companies a Concrete Application of Sen’s Capability Approach?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 329-342, May.
    13. Ensar Yilmaz, 2016. "A Methodological Dialogue on Justice," Nordic Journal of Political Economy, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, vol. 41, pages 1-1.
    14. Genevieve LeBaron, 2013. "Gender Inequalities, Households, and the Production of Well-Being in Modern Europe," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 141-145, January.
    15. Mohammad Abu-Zaineh & Maame Esi Woode, 2018. "Investigating the Dimensions of Youth Wellbeing: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling Approach Applied to Palestine," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(1), pages 57-78, February.
    16. Leßmann, Ortrud, 2011. "Empirische Studien zum Capability Ansatz auf der Grundlage von Befragungen: Ein Überblick," UFZ Discussion Papers 4/2011, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    17. Chiappero-Martinetti, Enrica & Moroni, Stefano, 2007. "An analytical framework for conceptualizing poverty and re-examining the capability approach," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 360-375, June.
    18. Stojilovska, Ana & Guyet, Rachel & Mahoney, Katherine & Gouveia, João Pedro & Castaño-Rosa, Raúl & Živčič, Lidija & Barbosa, Ricardo & Tkalec, Tomislav, 2022. "Energy poverty and emerging debates: Beyond the traditional triangle of energy poverty drivers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Francesco Alicino, 2020. "The sustainability of the human right to food," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 125-145.
    20. Dalila De Rosa, 2018. "Capability Approach and Multidimensional Well-Being: The Italian Case of BES," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 125-155, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1258-:d:882105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.