IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i6p905-d838477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced Automatic Identification of Urban Community Green Space Based on Semantic Segmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Jiangxi Chen

    (Department of Architecture, School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Siyu Shao

    (Department of Architecture, School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Yifei Zhu

    (Department of Architecture, School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Yu Wang

    (Department of Architecture, School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Fujie Rao

    (Department of Architecture, School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Xilei Dai

    (Department of the Built Environment, National University of Singapore, 4 Architecture Drive, Singapore 117566, Singapore)

  • Dayi Lai

    (Department of Architecture, School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Abstract

At the neighborhood scale, recognizing urban community green space (UCGS) is important for residential living condition assessment and urban planning. However, current studies have embodied two key issues. Firstly, existing studies have focused on large geographic scales, mixing urban and rural areas, neglecting the accuracy of green space contours at fine geographic scales. Secondly, the green spaces covered by shadows often suffer misclassification. To address these issues, we created a neighborhood-scale urban community green space (UCGS) dataset and proposed a segmentation decoder for HRNet backbone with two auxiliary decoders. Our proposed model adds two additional branches to the low-resolution representations to improve their discriminative ability, thus enhancing the overall performance when the high- and low-resolution representations are fused. To evaluate the performance of the model, we tested it on a dataset that includes satellite images of Shanghai, China. The model outperformed the other nine models in UCGS extraction, with a precision of 83.01, recall of 85.69, IoU of 72.91, F1-score of 84.33, and OA of 89.31. Our model also improved the integrity of the identification of shaded green spaces over HRNetV2. The proposed method could offer a useful tool for efficient UCGS detection and mapping in urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiangxi Chen & Siyu Shao & Yifei Zhu & Yu Wang & Fujie Rao & Xilei Dai & Dayi Lai, 2022. "Enhanced Automatic Identification of Urban Community Green Space Based on Semantic Segmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:905-:d:838477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/905/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/905/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiejie Han & Xi Zhao & Hao Zhang & Yu Liu, 2021. "Analyzing the Spatial Heterogeneity of the Built Environment and Its Impact on the Urban Thermal Environment—Case Study of Downtown Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Yilu Gong & Xueming Li & Xueping Cong & He Liu, 2020. "Research on the Complexity of Forms and Structures of Urban Green Spaces Based on Fractal Models," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-11, July.
    3. Monika Kopecká & Daniel Szatmári & Konštantín Rosina, 2017. "Analysis of Urban Green Spaces Based on Sentinel-2A: Case Studies from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Wu, Zhen & Chen, Ruishan & Meadows, Michael E. & Sengupta, Dhritiraj & Xu, Di, 2019. "Changing urban green spaces in Shanghai: trends, drivers and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaoyao Zhu & Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Morphological Transformation of Urban Open Spaces: Drivers, Trends, and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Neier, Thomas, 2023. "The green divide: A spatial analysis of segregation-based environmental inequality in Vienna," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Thomas Panagopoulos & Stilianos Tampakis & Paraskevi Karanikola & Aikaterini Karipidou-Kanari & Apostolos Kantartzis, 2018. "The Usage and Perception of Pedestrian and Cycling Streets on Residents’ Well-being in Kalamaria, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Yang Liu & Mohd Johari Mohd Yusof & Balqis Mohamed Rehan & Junainah Abu Kasim, 2024. "Assessment of the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in Urban Green Space via Intensity Analysis and Landscape Pattern Indices: A Case Study of Taiyuan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Greg D. Simpson & Jackie Parker, 2018. "Data on Peer-Reviewed Papers about Green Infrastructure, Urban Nature, and City Liveability," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-10, November.
    6. Vasyl Yukhnovskyi & Olha Zibtseva, 2019. "Normalization of green space as a component of ecological stability of a town," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(11), pages 428-437.
    7. Nordström, Jonas & Hammarlund, Cecilia, 2021. "You win some, you lose some - compensating the loss of green space in cities taking heterogeneous population characteristics into consideration," AgriFood-WP 2021:3, Lund University, AgriFood Economics Centre.
    8. Peihao Song & Gunwoo Kim & Audrey Mayer & Ruizhen He & Guohang Tian, 2020. "Assessing the Ecosystem Services of Various Types of Urban Green Spaces Based on i-Tree Eco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Vasyl Yukhnovskyi & Olha Zibtseva, 2020. "Green space trends in small towns of Kyiv region according to EOS Land Viewer - a case study," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(6), pages 252-263.
    10. Monika Kopecká & Harini Nagendra & Andrew Millington, 2018. "Urban Land Systems: An Ecosystems Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-4, January.
    11. Leisenheimer, Leonie & Wellmann, Thilo & Jänicke, Clemens & Haase, Dagmar, 2024. "Monitoring drought impacts on street trees using remote sensing - Disentangling temporal and species-specific response patterns with Sentinel-2 imagery," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 82, pages 1-14.
    12. Jackie Parker & Greg D. Simpson, 2018. "Public Green Infrastructure Contributes to City Livability: A Systematic Quantitative Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Huimin Wang & Canrui Lin & Sihua Ou & Qianying Feng & Kui Guo & Xiaojian Wei & Jiazhou Xie, 2024. "Multilevel Change of Urban Green Space and Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity Analysis of Driving Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Peter Bezák & Peter Mederly & Zita Izakovičová & Milena Moyzeová & Magdaléna Bezáková, 2020. "Perception of Ecosystem Services in Constituting Multi-Functional Landscapes in Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Noé Villegas Flores & Yelinca Saldeño Madero & Camilo Alberto Torres Parra & Isidoro Fasolino & Hugo Alexander Rondón Quintana, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Approach for Prioritizing and Managing Public Investment in Urban Spaces. A Case Study in the Triple Frontier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    16. Hao Zou & Xiaojun Wang, 2021. "Progress and Gaps in Research on Urban Green Space Morphology: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    17. Siqi Liu & Qing Yu & Chen Wei, 2019. "Spatial-Temporal Dynamic Analysis of Land Use and Landscape Pattern in Guangzhou, China: Exploring the Driving Forces from an Urban Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Zakharov, Konstantin & Mizgajski, Andrzej, 2024. "Socioeconomic and political settings for the land development decreasing urban green. Inside view from Moscow," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    19. Weiwei Zhang & Jigang Han & Abiot Molla & Shudi Zuo & Yin Ren, 2021. "The Optimization Strategy of the Existing Urban Green Space Soil Monitoring System in Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Yishao Shi & Danxuan Liu, 2020. "Relationship between Urban New Business Indexes and the Business Environment of Chinese Cities: A Study Based on Entropy-TOPSIS and a Gaussian Process Regression Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:905-:d:838477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.