IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i2p229-d741492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Variations in Farmland Rents and Its Drivers in Rural China: Evidence from Plot-Level Transactions

Author

Listed:
  • Aoxi Yang

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
    New Liberal Arts Laboratory for Sustainable Development of Rural Western China, Chongqing 400715, China)

  • Yahui Wang

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
    New Liberal Arts Laboratory for Sustainable Development of Rural Western China, Chongqing 400715, China)

Abstract

Reasonable rent is the key to promoting land transfer and realizing agricultural operations on a moderate scale in rural China. The purpose of this study was to reveal the spatiotemporal variations in farmland rents and their drivers by employing a multilevel model based on 3547 plot-level transactions in Sichuan Province of China. The results show that the rents of paddy field, irrigated land, dry land and other types of farmland have all maintained an upward trend since 2014, rising by 61%, 53%, 44% and 224%, respectively. The average rent per ha for these properties reached CNY 13,920, 12,285, 10,230 and 7980 in 2020 (1 USD = CNY 6.90 in 2020), respectively. Farmland rents have shown a significant spatial agglomeration phenomenon, and the regions with higher rent were mainly distributed in Chengdu and its surrounding areas, while the regions with lower rent were distributed in the east and northeast of Sichuan Province. The differences in farmland rent were influenced by multilevel factors such as plot level and regional level, and the former explained 73.4% of the farmland rent variation. The plots with a larger area, longer transfer period, clear ownership, better location and good-quality land had higher rents; otherwise, the rents were lower.

Suggested Citation

  • Aoxi Yang & Yahui Wang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Variations in Farmland Rents and Its Drivers in Rural China: Evidence from Plot-Level Transactions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:229-:d:741492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/2/229/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/2/229/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kung, James Kai-sing, 2002. "Choice of Land Tenure in China: The Case of a Country with Quasi-Private Property Rights," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 50(4), pages 793-817, July.
    2. Wang, Yahui & Li, Xiubin & Lu, Dan & Yan, Jianzhong, 2020. "Evaluating the impact of land fragmentation on the cost of agricultural operation in the southwest mountainous areas of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ting Du & Chao Li & Zhaolin Wang, 2023. "Spatial Differentiation and Influencing Mechanisms of Farmland Transfer Rents in Mountainous Areas: Evidence from Chongqing and Its Surrounding Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Yang Guo & Meiling Cui & Zhigang Xu, 2023. "Effect of Spatial Characteristics of Farmland Plots on Transfer Patterns in China: A Supply and Demand Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Yunjie Shi & Hengpeng Li & Jianwei Geng & Akida Askar & Zhongjing Zhao & Jiaping Pang & Wangshou Zhang & Yuyang Shao, 2024. "Breaking the Boundary between Permanent Capital Farmland and Arable Land in China: Understanding State and Drivers of Permanent Capital Farmland Non-Grain Production in a Rapid Urbanizing County," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jian Wei & Hui Xiao & Hao Liu & Xiaotao Huang & Dahong Zhang, 2022. "Does the Collective Forestland Tenure Reform Promote Rural Households’ Forestry Inputs? Based on Dual Perspectives of Rural Households’ Divergence and Inter-Generational Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Mullan, Katrina & Grosjean, Pauline & Kontoleon, Andreas, 2011. "Land Tenure Arrangements and Rural-Urban Migration in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 123-133, January.
    3. Jia, Lili & Petrick, Martin, 2014. "How does land fragmentation affect off-farm labor supply: panel data evidence from China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 45(3), pages 369-380.
    4. Xiuling Ding & Qian Lu & Lipeng Li & Apurbo Sarkar & Hua Li, 2023. "Does Labor Transfer Improve Farmers’ Willingness to Withdraw from Farming?—A Bivariate Probit Modeling Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Yishao Shi & Qianqian Yang & Liangliang Zhou & Shouzheng Shi, 2022. "Can Moderate Agricultural Scale Operations Be Developed against the Background of Plot Fragmentation and Land Dispersion? Evidence from the Suburbs of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Deininger, Klaus & Jin, Songqing, 2009. "Securing property rights in transition: Lessons from implementation of China's rural land contracting law," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 70(1-2), pages 22-38, May.
    7. Liu, Kai & Zhu, Wenjue & Luo, Mingzhong, 2022. "Land integration and titling policy in China: Institutional barriers and countermeasures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    8. Jinna Yu & Yiming Wei & Wei Fang & Zhen Liu & Yujie Zhang & Jing Lan, 2021. "New Round of Collective Forest Rights Reform, Forestland Transfer and Household Production Efficiency," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Ji, Xiangyu & Wang, Yiting & Yang, Lei & Li, Chun & Chen, Liding, 2025. "The impact of cropland transfer on rural household income in China: The moderating effects of education," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Tanrıvermiş, Yeşim & Tanrıvermiş, Harun & Uisso, Amani Michael, 2024. "Assessment of farmland fragmentation and the role of the legal regulations for the prevention of farmland fragmentation in Türki̇ye," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    11. Deininger, Klaus & Jin, Songqing, 2006. "Tenure security and land-related investment: Evidence from Ethiopia," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(5), pages 1245-1277, July.
    12. Jia, Lili & Petrick, Martin, 2011. "How land fragmentation affects off-farm labor supply in China: Evidence from household panel data," 51st Annual Conference, Halle, Germany, September 28-30, 2011 114522, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    13. LAI, Lawrence W.C. & DAVIES, Stephen N.G. & CHAU, K.W. & CHOY, Lennon H.T. & CHUA, Mark H. & LAM, Terry K.W., 2022. "A centennial literature review (1919–2019) of research publications on land readjustment from a neo-institutional economic perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Meng Wang & Qingchen Xu & Zemeng Fan & Xiaofang Sun, 2021. "The Imprint of Built-Up Land Expansion on Cropland Distribution and Productivity in Shandong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    15. Yiwen, Zhang & Kant, Shashi, 2022. "Secure tenure or equal access? Farmers’ preferences for reallocating the property rights of collective farmland and forestland in Southeast China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Shukun Wang & Dengwang Li & Tingting Li & Changquan Liu, 2021. "Land Use Transitions and Farm Performance in China: A Perspective of Land Fragmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Jie Zhang & Meiqiu Chen & Chang Huang & Zhaohao Lai, 2022. "Labor Endowment, Cultivated Land Fragmentation, and Ecological Farming Adoption Strategies among Farmers in Jiangxi Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Maëlys de La Rupelle & Deng Quheng & Li Shi & Thomas Vendryes, 2009. "Land rights insecurity and temporary migration in rural China," PSE Working Papers halshs-00575041, HAL.
    19. Guanyi Yin & Yi Lou & Shuai Xie & Wei Wei, 2022. "Evaluation of the Response of Grain Productivity to Different Arable Land Allocation Intensities in the Land Use Planning System of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Bo Li & Hao Ouyang & Tong Wang & Tian Dong, 2023. "Coupling Relationship between Rural Settlement Patterns and Landscape Fragmentation in Woodlands and Biological Reserves—A Case of Nanshan National Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:229-:d:741492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.