IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i4p370-d529302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Pattern and Mechanism of Land Use Mixture: Evidence from China’s County Data

Author

Listed:
  • Yanting Zheng

    (School of Economics and Resource Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Beijing Key Lab of Study on SCI-TECH Strategy for Urban Green Development, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Sai Zhao

    (School of Economics and Resource Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Jinyuan Huang

    (School of Economics and Resource Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Beijing Key Lab of Study on SCI-TECH Strategy for Urban Green Development, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Aifeng Lv

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and National Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

The mixture of agricultural and non-agricultural land-use represents a new pattern of urbanization in the Global South. This mixture has hindered the improvement of land-use productivity and makes it difficult to achieve the centralized disposal of pollutants, which has resulted in the waste of land resources and serious environmental problems. Although many studies have investigated land-use mixture, most of them remain descriptive and lack quantitative examination and an in-depth mechanism analysis. Using raster land-use data, this paper examines the spatiotemporal pattern of the land-use mixture in China between 1990 and 2015 by calculating join counts values supplemented by landscape metrics, and attempts to explain the regional variations in land-use mixtures in recent years. The results show that, between 2000 and 2010, land-use was more mixed in fast-growing regions such as Zhejiang, Fujian, Chongqing, Guangdong, and some major metropolises and mining cities, and that, between 2010 and 2015, land-use was more mixed in Central China. Additionally, the results of econometric models reveal that mixed land-use can be alleviated in regions with strict land planning and management, such as urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta, as well as in areas with high levels of urbanization. Furthermore, the results of a spatial heterogeneity analysis show that strict land management has played an important role in reducing the land-use mixture in Eastern China; however, it has not played a significant role in Central China. The findings of this study suggest that land-use should be appropriately planned and managed to ensure sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanting Zheng & Sai Zhao & Jinyuan Huang & Aifeng Lv, 2021. "Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Pattern and Mechanism of Land Use Mixture: Evidence from China’s County Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:370-:d:529302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/4/370/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/4/370/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deng, Xiangzheng & Huang, Jikun & Rozelle, Scott & Uchida, Emi, 2008. "Growth, population and industrialization, and urban land expansion of China," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 96-115, January.
    2. Kurt Riitters & Karen Schleeweis & Jennifer Costanza, 2020. "Forest Area Change in the Shifting Landscape Mosaic of the Continental United States from 2001 to 2016," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Suranga Wadduwage & Andrew Millington & Neville D. Crossman & Harpinder Sandhu, 2017. "Agricultural Land Fragmentation at Urban Fringes: An Application of Urban-To-Rural Gradient Analysis in Adelaide," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Benjamin T. Phalan, 2018. "What Have We Learned from the Land Sparing-sharing Model?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Yasi Tian, 2020. "Mapping Suburbs Based on Spatial Interactions and Effect Analysis on Ecological Landscape Change: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province from 1998 to 2018, Eastern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pengrui Wang & Chen Zeng & Yan Song & Long Guo & Wenping Liu & Wenting Zhang, 2021. "The Spatial Effect of Administrative Division on Land-Use Intensity," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Zheng, Yanting & Yang, Huidan & Huang, Jinyuan & Cui, Qi & Zhan, Jinyan, 2022. "Industrial agglomeration measured by plants’ distance and CO2 emissions: Evidence from 268 Chinese prefecture-level cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Jiale Zhou & Xiaofen Yu & Xizan Jin & Nuannuan Mao, 2021. "Government Competition, Land Supply Structure and Semi-Urbanization in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-29, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heying Li & Jiayao Wang & Jianchen Zhang & Fen Qin & Jiyuan Hu & Zheng Zhou, 2021. "Analysis of Characteristics and Driving Factors of Wetland Landscape Pattern Change in Henan Province from 1980 to 2015," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Haiwen Zhou, 2013. "The Choice of Technology and Rural-Urban Migration in Economic Development," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 8(3), pages 337-361, September.
    3. Dai, Jiangyu & Wu, Shiqiang & Han, Guoyi & Weinberg, Josh & Xie, Xinghua & Wu, Xiufeng & Song, Xingqiang & Jia, Benyou & Xue, Wanyun & Yang, Qianqian, 2018. "Water-energy nexus: A review of methods and tools for macro-assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 393-408.
    4. Xu, Tingting & Gao, Jay & Li, Yuhua, 2019. "Machine learning-assisted evaluation of land use policies and plans in a rapidly urbanizing district in Chongqing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Long, Fenjie & Zheng, Longfei & Song, Zhida, 2018. "High-speed rail and urban expansion: An empirical study using a time series of nighttime light satellite data in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 106-118.
    6. Borice Augustin Ngounou & Honoré Tekam Oumbe & Bruno Emmanuel Ongo Nkoa & Edmond Noubissi Domguia, 2024. "Inclusive growth in the face of increasing urbanization: What experience for African countries?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 34-70, February.
    7. Shasha Lu & Xingliang Guan & Chao He & Jiali Zhang, 2014. "Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Policy Implications of Urban Land Expansion in Metropolitan Areas: A Case Study of Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-26, July.
    8. Poelhekke, Steven, 2011. "Urban growth and uninsured rural risk: Booming towns in bust times," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 461-475, November.
    9. Ke Huang & Martin Dallimer & Lindsay C. Stringer & Anlu Zhang & Ting Zhang, 2021. "Does Economic Agglomeration Lead to Efficient Rural to Urban Land Conversion? An Examination of China’s Metropolitan Area Development Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Elke Stehfest & Willem-Jan Zeist & Hugo Valin & Petr Havlik & Alexander Popp & Page Kyle & Andrzej Tabeau & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Tomoko Hasegawa & Benjamin L. Bodirsky & Katherine Calvin & Jonathan C, 2019. "Key determinants of global land-use projections," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Wu, Rong & Li, Yingcheng & Wang, Shaojian, 2022. "Will the construction of high-speed rail accelerate urban land expansion? Evidences from Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    12. William C. Strange, 2009. "Viewpoint: Agglomeration research in the age of disaggregation," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 42(1), pages 1-27, February.
    13. Yasi Tian & Junyi Chen, 2022. "Suburban sprawl measurement and landscape analysis of cropland and ecological land: A case study of Jiangsu Province, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1282-1305, September.
    14. Zhang, Yumei & Diao, Xinshen, 2020. "The changing role of agriculture with economic structural change – The case of China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    15. Zhao, Zhe & Bai, Yuping & Wang, Guofeng & Chen, Jiancheng & Yu, Jiangli & Liu, Wei, 2018. "Land eco-efficiency for new-type urbanization in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 19-26.
    16. Jinfeng Wang & Xuhua Liu & Hongyan Chen, 2011. "Construction of a Cities Evolution Tree, with Applications," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1360, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Li, Zhihui & Deng, Xiangzheng & Yin, Fang & Yang, Cuiyuan, 2015. "Analysis of climate and land use changes impacts on land degradation in the North China Plain," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-11.
    18. René Poccard-Chapuis & Sophie Plassin & Reinis Osis & Daniel Pinillos & Gustavo Martinez Pimentel & Marcelo Cordeiro Thalês & François Laurent & Mario Rodrigo de Oliveira Gomes & Laura Angelica Ferrei, 2021. "Mapping Land Suitability to Guide Landscape Restoration in the Amazon," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, April.
    19. Rui Wang, 2011. "Environmental and resource sustainability of Chinese cities: A review of issues, policies, practices and effects," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(2), pages 112-121, May.
    20. Jipeng Zhang & Jianyong Fan & Jiawei Mo, 2017. "Government Intervention, Land Market, And Urban Development: Evidence From Chinese Cities," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(1), pages 115-136, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:370-:d:529302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.