IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i11p1175-d670437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types

Author

Listed:
  • Josip Križanović

    (Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Doris Pivac

    (Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Hrvoje Tomić

    (Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Siniša Mastelić-Ivić

    (Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Land administration systems differ by their types and practices. The data dissemination practices are considered to be outdated, as in most cases the digitisation of land administration data was conducted to match the paper-based system. This paper reviews four different land administration data dissemination practices through four case studies, where each selected jurisdiction represents one land administration system type. The analysed LAS data dissemination practices were conducted for Croatia, England, New Zealand and Green County, OH, USA. The main goal of the analysis was to examine the differences and similarities between the respective countries’ land data practices provided by the excerpts related to one parcel. The identified differences and similarities might be of great use when it comes to further improvement and standardisation of land administration data dissemination practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac & Hrvoje Tomić & Siniša Mastelić-Ivić, 2021. "Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1175-:d:670437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1175/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1175/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pauliina Krigsholm & Kirsikka Riekkinen & Pirjo Ståhle, 2018. "The Changing Uses of Cadastral Information: A User-Driven Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Miodrag Roić & Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac, 2021. "An Approach to Resolve Inconsistencies of Data in the Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Bennett, Rohan Mark & Pickering, M. & Sargent, J., 2019. "Transformations, transitions, or tall tales? A global review of the uptake and impact of NoSQL, blockchain, and big data analytics on the land administration sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 435-448.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mekonnen Tesfaye Metaferia & Rohan Mark Bennett & Berhanu Kefale Alemie & Mila Koeva, 2022. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration and the Framework for Effective Land Administration: Synthesis of Contemporary Experiences," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Josip Križanović & Miodrag Roić, 2023. "Development of a Methodology and Model for Land Administration Data Dissemination Processes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2021. "A reformative framework for processes from building permit issuing to property ownership in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Josip Križanović & Miodrag Roić, 2023. "Development of a Methodology and Model for Land Administration Data Dissemination Processes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Mladen Šoškić & Nenad Višnjevac & Rajica Mihajlović & Dragan Mihajlović & Stevan Marošan, 2022. "The Development of Land Readjustment Models in Serbia and South-East Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Stöcker, Claudia & Bennett, Rohan & Koeva, Mila & Nex, Francesco & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2022. "Scaling up UAVs for land administration: Towards the plateau of productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    6. Miodrag Roić & Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac, 2021. "An Approach to Resolve Inconsistencies of Data in the Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Hubert Frąszczak, 2021. "Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Sundarakani, Balan & Ajaykumar, Aneesh & Gunasekaran, Angappa, 2021. "Big data driven supply chain design and applications for blockchain: An action research using case study approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Jaljolie, Ruba & Riekkinen, Kirsikka & Dalyot, Sagi, 2021. "A topological-based approach for determining spatial relationships of complex volumetric parcels in land administration systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Pierre-François Blin & Trias Aditya & Purnama Budi Santosa & Christophe Claramunt, 2023. "A Methodological Approach towards Cyber Risk Management in Land Administrations Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Abebe Mengaw Wubie & Walter Timo de Vries & Berhanu Kefale Alemie, 2020. "Evaluating the Quality of Land Information for Peri-Urban Land-Related Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis from Bahir Dar, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Madsen, Morten D. & Paasch, Jesper M. & Sørensen, Esben M., 2022. "The many faces of condominiums and various management structures − The Danish case," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Yildiz, Umit & Gürel, Murat & Kocaman, Sultan, 2022. "State liability and uncertainty perception on cadastral parcel area registry in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    14. Sulonen, Kimmo & Riekkinen, Kirsikka & Kotilainen, Seija, 2020. "Customer-oriented approach in cadastral procedures – Case study from Finland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Habib, Maan, 2020. "Developing a sustainability strategy for multipurpose cadastre in post-conflict Syria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    16. Rohan Mark Bennett & Eva-Maria Unger & Christiaan Lemmen & Paula Dijkstra, 2021. "Land Administration Maintenance: A Review of the Persistent Problem and Emerging Fit-for-Purpose Solutions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Agnieszka Trystuła & Małgorzata Dudzińska & Ryszard Źróbek, 2020. "Evaluation of the Completeness of Spatial Data Infrastructure in the Context of Cadastral Data Sharing," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Carmen Femenia-Ribera & Gaspar Mora-Navarro & Jose Carlos Martinez-Llario, 2021. "Advances in the Coordination between the Cadastre and Land Registry," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    19. Metaferia, Mekonnen Tesfaye & Bennett, Rohan Mark & Alemie, Berhanu Kefale & Koeva, Mila, 2023. "The peri-urban cadastre of Addis Ababa: Status, challenges, and fit-for-purpose prospects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    20. Bacior, Stanisław, 2023. "Austrian Cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1175-:d:670437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.