IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i1p70-d480361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Approach to Resolve Inconsistencies of Data in the Cadastre

Author

Listed:
  • Miodrag Roić

    (Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Josip Križanović

    (Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Doris Pivac

    (Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

A cadastre, as one of the key registers of land administration, must be maintained to provide up-to-date land information. Before digitization, technical and alphanumerical datasets were maintained separately, leading to redundant data. This resulted in numerous inconsistencies between the cadastral map and the register, leading to the loss of integrity of these authoritative data. The fact that the cadastral map and the register are in the electronic form today does not guarantee their integrity and quality. The aim of this research was to develop a methodology for analyzing and resolving the inconsistencies between a cadastral map and a register, which were indicated by the differences found in the quality controls in cadastral map vectorization projects. A detailed analysis of the differences between the cadastral map and the register data resulted with systematization of causes and the sources of errors, which then led to the inconsistencies between the two cadastral datasets. The cadastral datasets required for such an analysis were scanned and georeferenced cadastral map sheets, vectorized cadastral map, and vectorization reports. The proposed methodology was tested on three cadastral municipalities in Croatia, namely Dol, Postira, and Stobreč. A detailed analysis of each individual inconsistency showed that the inconsistencies were caused not only by the maintenance errors but also by other processes that affected the cadastral datasets throughout their lifetime.

Suggested Citation

  • Miodrag Roić & Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac, 2021. "An Approach to Resolve Inconsistencies of Data in the Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:70-:d:480361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/1/70/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/1/70/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pauliina Krigsholm & Kirsikka Riekkinen & Pirjo Ståhle, 2018. "The Changing Uses of Cadastral Information: A User-Driven Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Vučić, Nikola & Mađer, Mario & Vranić, Saša & Roić, Miodrag, 2020. "Initial 3D cadastre registration by cadastral resurvey in the Republic of Croatia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Hubert Frąszczak, 2021. "Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Metaferia, Mekonnen Tesfaye & Bennett, Rohan Mark & Alemie, Berhanu Kefale & Koeva, Mila, 2023. "The peri-urban cadastre of Addis Ababa: Status, challenges, and fit-for-purpose prospects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Bacior, Stanisław, 2023. "Austrian Cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Yildiz, Umit & Gürel, Murat & Kocaman, Sultan, 2022. "State liability and uncertainty perception on cadastral parcel area registry in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    5. Malgorzata Busko & Michal Apollo, 2023. "Public Administration and Landowners Facing Real Estate Cadastre Modernization: A Win-Lose or Win-Win Situation?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac & Hrvoje Tomić & Siniša Mastelić-Ivić, 2021. "Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Bujar Fetai & Jernej Tekavec & Mojca Kosmatin Fras & Anka Lisec, 2022. "Inconsistencies in Cadastral Boundary Data—Digitisation and Maintenance," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Josip Križanović & Miodrag Roić, 2023. "Development of a Methodology and Model for Land Administration Data Dissemination Processes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Mladen Šoškić & Nenad Višnjevac & Rajica Mihajlović & Dragan Mihajlović & Stevan Marošan, 2022. "The Development of Land Readjustment Models in Serbia and South-East Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Jaljolie, Ruba & Riekkinen, Kirsikka & Dalyot, Sagi, 2021. "A topological-based approach for determining spatial relationships of complex volumetric parcels in land administration systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2022. "Reviewing the literature on the tripartite cycle containing digital building permit, 3D city modeling, and 3D property ownership," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    4. Abebe Mengaw Wubie & Walter Timo de Vries & Berhanu Kefale Alemie, 2020. "Evaluating the Quality of Land Information for Peri-Urban Land-Related Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis from Bahir Dar, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Madsen, Morten D. & Paasch, Jesper M. & Sørensen, Esben M., 2022. "The many faces of condominiums and various management structures − The Danish case," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Chryssy Potsiou & Nikolaos Doulamis & Nikolaos Bakalos & Maria Gkeli & Charalabos Ioannidis & Selena Markouizou, 2022. "A Prototype Machine Learning Tool Aiming to Support 3D Crowdsourced Cadastral Surveying of Self-Made Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Sulonen, Kimmo & Riekkinen, Kirsikka & Kotilainen, Seija, 2020. "Customer-oriented approach in cadastral procedures – Case study from Finland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Habib, Maan, 2020. "Developing a sustainability strategy for multipurpose cadastre in post-conflict Syria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2021. "A reformative framework for processes from building permit issuing to property ownership in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    10. Munkhbaatar Buuveibaatar & Kangjae Lee & Wonhee Lee, 2022. "Implementation of the LADM-Based Cadastral Model for Mongolia towards Transition to a 3D Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Jarosław Bydłosz & Agnieszka Bieda, 2020. "Developing a UML Model for the 3D Cadastre in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Carmen Femenia-Ribera & Gaspar Mora-Navarro & Jose Carlos Martinez-Llario, 2021. "Advances in the Coordination between the Cadastre and Land Registry," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac & Hrvoje Tomić & Siniša Mastelić-Ivić, 2021. "Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Krigsholm, Pauliina & Riekkinen, Kirsikka & Ståhle, Pirjo, 2020. "Pathways for a future cadastral system: A socio-technical approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    15. Evangelia Balla & Jaap Zevenbergen & Ana Mafalda Madureira & Yola Georgiadou, 2022. "Too Much, Too Soon? The Changes in Greece’s Land Administration Organizations during the Economic Crisis Period 2009 to 2018," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:70-:d:480361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.