IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v97y2020ics0264837720302453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a sustainability strategy for multipurpose cadastre in post-conflict Syria

Author

Listed:
  • Habib, Maan

Abstract

There is no doubt that the armed conflict is development in reverse that brings about a severe wastage of human capital and infrastructures. The ongoing violence over the last half a decade in Syria has caused serious economic devastation and a massive loss of properties, landlessness, and lack of clarity relating to ownership or use rights. Post-conflict reconstruction is essential as it assigns the future shape of the country, and it is mostly determined by the commitment and capacities of local populations, including national government and civil society, to maintain the process. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the challenges, obstacles, and issues inhibiting the approach of restoring and sustainably developing the current system. Building a potential cadastral system for post-conflict Syria requires practical contributions from all stakeholders to explore possible ideas that may come up with other procedures for solving many legal, political, and technical issues. The design of a clear strategic framework for modernizing cadastral infrastructure will provide more excellent social stability and expand the prospects for economic growth within post-conflict communities. The main objective of this research is to describe a proposed approach for a reconstruction process oriented towards building an electronic multipurpose cadastre in support of sustainable development from an international perspective in line with modern technology. The addressed model ensures unified real estate registration and simplifies the information interchange between agencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Habib, Maan, 2020. "Developing a sustainability strategy for multipurpose cadastre in post-conflict Syria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:97:y:2020:i:c:s0264837720302453
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837720302453
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104782?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pauliina Krigsholm & Kirsikka Riekkinen & Pirjo Ståhle, 2018. "The Changing Uses of Cadastral Information: A User-Driven Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Guan Li & Rong Liao & Cifang Wu, 2019. "Towards a Valuation and Taxation Information Model for Chinese Rural Collective Construction Land," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Bala Krishnamoorthy & Christine D'Lima, 2014. "Benchmarking as a measure of competitiveness," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 342-359.
    4. Dimo Todorovski & Jossam Potel, 2019. "Exploring the Nexus between Displacement and Land Administration: The Case of Rwanda," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Solomon Dargie Chekole & Walter Timo de Vries & Gebeyehu Belay Shibeshi, 2020. "An Evaluation Framework for Urban Cadastral System Policy in Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Klimach, Anna & Dawidowicz, Agnieszka & Źróbek, Ryszard, 2018. "The Polish land administration system supporting good governance," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 547-555.
    7. Emily Stubblefield & Sandra Joireman, 2019. "Law, Violence, and Property Expropriation in Syria: Impediments to Restitution and Return," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carmen Femenia-Ribera & Gaspar Mora-Navarro & Jose Carlos Martinez-Llario, 2021. "Advances in the Coordination between the Cadastre and Land Registry," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Sobolewska-Mikulska Katarzyna & Cienciała Agnieszka, 2020. "Legal-Surveying Documentation in the Registration of Rights to Properties of the Treasury and of Territorial Self-government Units – Case Study of Poland," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 28(2), pages 76-88, June.
    3. Walker, Nathan L. & Styles, David & Coughlan, Paul & Williams, A. Prysor, 2022. "Cross-sector sustainability benchmarking of major utilities in the United Kingdom," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Miodrag Roić & Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac, 2021. "An Approach to Resolve Inconsistencies of Data in the Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Abebe Mengaw Wubie & Walter Timo de Vries & Berhanu Kefale Alemie, 2020. "Evaluating the Quality of Land Information for Peri-Urban Land-Related Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis from Bahir Dar, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Sulonen, Kimmo & Riekkinen, Kirsikka & Kotilainen, Seija, 2020. "Customer-oriented approach in cadastral procedures – Case study from Finland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Solomon Dargie Chekole & Walter Timo de Vries & Pamela Durán-Díaz & Gebeyehu Belay Shibeshi, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of the Urban Cadastral System in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Nam, Pham Phuong & Thanh Huyen, Phan Thi & Van Ha, Pham, 2021. "Factors affecting the management of public agricultural land fund in Gia Lam District, Hanoi City, Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    10. Dan Li & Wenjing Zhong & Yitao Chen, 2022. "The Role of Farmland Titling in Urban Agricultural Resilience: Evidence from Metropolitan Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac & Hrvoje Tomić & Siniša Mastelić-Ivić, 2021. "Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Eda Ustaoglu & Brendan Williams, 2022. "Institutional Settings and Effects on Agricultural Land Conversion: A Global and Spatial Analysis of European Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, December.
    13. Kusmiarto Kusmiarto & Trias Aditya & Djurdjani Djurdjani & Subaryono Subaryono, 2021. "Digital Transformation of Land Services in Indonesia: A Readiness Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Krigsholm, Pauliina & Riekkinen, Kirsikka & Ståhle, Pirjo, 2020. "Pathways for a future cadastral system: A socio-technical approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    15. Chanrith Ngin & Andreas Neef, 2021. "Contested Land Restitution Processes in Cambodia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Silva, Andréa Oliveira da & Fernandes, Ricardo Augusto Souza, 2020. "Smart governance based on multipurpose territorial cadastre and geographic information system: An analysis of geoinformation, transparency and collaborative participation for Brazilian capitals," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    17. Cienciała Agnieszka, 2019. "Selected Aspects of the Management of Real Estates Owned by Legal Persons of Churches and other Religious Associations," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 97-108, September.
    18. Hajji, Rafika & El Asri, Hanae & Ez-Zriouli, Chaymae, 2023. "Upgrading to 3D cadastre in Morocco: Lessons learned from benchmarking of international 3D cadastral systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    19. Jarmila Horváthová & Martina Mokrišová & Mária Vrábliková, 2021. "Benchmarking—A Way of Finding Risk Factors in Business Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Worku Nega & Mulugeta Tenaw & Yeneneh Hunie & Sayeh Kassaw Agegnehu & Reinfried Mansberger, 2021. "Evaluating Institutional Dichotomy between Urban and Rural Land Administration in Amhara Region, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:97:y:2020:i:c:s0264837720302453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.