IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i23p6610-d290020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Valuation and Taxation Information Model for Chinese Rural Collective Construction Land

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongguo Xu

    (Department of Land Administration, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China)

  • Yuefei Zhuo

    (Department of Land Administration, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China)

  • Guan Li

    (Law School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Rong Liao

    (Department of Land Administration, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Department of Foreign Affairs, China Land Surveying and Planning Institute, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Cifang Wu

    (Department of Land Administration, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China)

Abstract

To promote rural revitalisation, China’s central government revised the land administration law to allow rural collective construction land (RCL) to be traded in the market and attract private and financial capitals into rural investment and development. However, the land value appreciation income of the market access is closely related to geographical location. Hence, the value appreciation of RCL is enormous in villages around cities and towns. By contrast, the land value appreciation of RCL is low in villages away from cities and towns. This marked difference will lead to a significant impact on the rural social structure. To avoid the excessive widening of the income gap in rural areas, China’s central government attempted to conduct land value capture by revising and implementing land tax laws and reasonably distributing the value appreciation income of market access amongst the state, collectives and individuals. In response to the requirements of land reform, this study firstly identifies the legal constraints on the taxation of RCL in China through the structured retrieval and organisation of legal documents on land taxation. Thereafter, the technical constraints are analysed through the structural retrieval and organisation of the technical specifications of China’s land valuation. Lastly, this study proposes a land administration domain model (LADM) valuation and taxation information model on the basis of the aforementioned constraints. The major contents of the proposed model encompass improving the information management of taxpayer identity registration, supplementing land valuation methods and strengthening valuation information of the large-scale influencing factors. The proposed model is the technical basis to prompt the interconnection between the real estate registration and real estate taxation systems, which will be conducive to the efficient collaboration of the two systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Guan Li & Rong Liao & Cifang Wu, 2019. "Towards a Valuation and Taxation Information Model for Chinese Rural Collective Construction Land," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6610-:d:290020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6610/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6610/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Polat, Zeynel Abidin & Alkan, Mehmet, 2018. "Design and implementation of a LADM-based external archive data model for land registry and cadastre transactions in Turkey: A case study of municipality," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 249-266.
    2. Wang, Jinshuo & Samsura, D. Ary A. & van der Krabben, Erwin, 2019. "Institutional barriers to financing transit-oriented development in China: Analyzing informal land value capture strategies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-10.
    3. McAllister, Pat & Shepherd, Edward & Wyatt, Peter, 2018. "Policy shifts, developer contributions and land value capture in London 2005–2017," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 316-326.
    4. Ho, Peter, 2005. "Institutions in Transition: Land Ownership, Property Rights, and Social Conflict in China," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199280698, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kara, Abdullah & van Oosterom, Peter & Kathmann, Ruud & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2023. "Visualisation and dissemination of 3D valuation units and groups – An LADM valuation information compliant prototype," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Habib, Maan, 2020. "Developing a sustainability strategy for multipurpose cadastre in post-conflict Syria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Tomić, Hrvoje & Ivić, Siniša Mastelić & Roić, Miodrag & Šiško, Josip, 2021. "Developing an efficient property valuation system using the LADM valuation information model: A Croatian case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongchun Yang & Deli Zhang & Qingmin Meng & Corrin McCarn, 2015. "Urban Residential Land Use Reconstruction under Dual-Track Mechanism of Market Socialism in China: A Case Study of Chengdu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Abdi, Mohammad Hamed, 2021. "What the newcomers to transit-oriented development are confronted with? Evidence from Iranian policy and planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Iban, Muzaffer Can & Aksu, Oktay, 2020. "A model for big spatial rural data infrastructure in Turkey: Sensor-driven and integrative approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Brightnes Risimati & Trynos Gumbo & James Chakwizira, 2021. "Spatial Integration of Non-Motorized Transport and Urban Public Transport Infrastructure: A Case of Johannesburg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Weihang Gong & Jing (Victor) Li & Mee Kam Ng, 2021. "Deciphering Property Development around High-Speed Railway Stations through Land Value Capture: Case Studies in Shenzhen and Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Thorning, Daniel & Balch, Christopher & Essex, Stephen, 2019. "The delivery of mixed communities in the regeneration of urban waterfronts: An investigation of the comparative experience of Plymouth and Bristol," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 238-251.
    7. Xianlei Ma & Justus Wesseler & Nico Heerink & Futian Qu, 2013. "Land Tenure Reforms and Land Conservation Investments in China ¨C What Does Real Option Value Theory Tell Us?," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 3, pages 19-33, August.
    8. Ran Liu & Tai-Chee Wong & Shenghe Liu, 2012. "Peasants' Counterplots against the State Monopoly of the Rural Urbanization Process: Urban Villages and ‘Small Property Housing’ in Beijing, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(5), pages 1219-1240, May.
    9. Weiwei Wang & Lihua Zhou & Guojing Yang & Yan Sun & Yong Chen, 2019. "Prohibited Grazing Policy Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction in Rural Northwest China—A Case Study in Yanchi County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Yang, Jiawen & Su, Pinren & Cao, Jason, 2020. "On the importance of Shenzhen metro transit to land development and threshold effect," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-11.
    11. Xu Guangdong, 2013. "Property Rights, Law, and Economic Development," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 117-142, July.
    12. Norman Long & Jinlong Liu, 2009. "The Centrality of Actors and Interfaces in the Understanding of New Ruralities: A Chinese Case Study," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 38(4), pages 63-84.
    13. Vejchodská, Eliška & Barreira, Ana Paula & Auziņš, Armands & Jürgenson, Evelin & Fowles, Steven & Maliene, Vida, 2022. "Bridging land value capture with land rent narratives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    14. Roberto Fanfani & Nica Claudia Calò, 2011. "Rural Areas and Agricultural Holdings in China: What Has Changed Within Ten Years from the 1996 to the 2006?," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 4, December.
    15. Hayati Sari Hasibuan & Mari Mulyani, 2022. "Transit-Oriented Development: Towards Achieving Sustainable Transport and Urban Development in Jakarta Metropolitan, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    16. repec:cup:cbooks:9781108969055 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Atazadeh, Behnam & Olfat, Hamed & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen & Shojaei, Davood & Marjani, Afshin Mesbah, 2021. "Linking Land Administration Domain Model and BIM environment for 3D digital cadastre in multi-storey buildings," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    18. Wang, Rongyu & Tan, Rong, 2020. "Patterns of revenue distribution in rural residential land consolidation in contemporary China: The perspective of property rights delineation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    19. Zhiming Cheng, 2012. "The changing and different patterns of urban redevelopment in China: a study of three inner-city neighborhoods," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 430-450, July.
    20. Shenjing He & Yuting Liu & Chris Webster & Fulong Wu, 2009. "Property Rights Redistribution, Entitlement Failure and the Impoverishment of Landless Farmers in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(9), pages 1925-1949, August.
    21. Vejchodská, Eliška & Pelucha, Martin, 2019. "Environmental charges as drivers of soil sealing? The case of the Czech charge for agricultural land loss," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6610-:d:290020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.