IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i6p834-d830369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Development of Land Readjustment Models in Serbia and South-East Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Mladen Šoškić

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Nenad Višnjevac

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Rajica Mihajlović

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dragan Mihajlović

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Stevan Marošan

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Land readjustment (LR) is increasingly applied as a tool of urban policy implementation in many countries of the world. In Serbia, LR is a new tool that is being introduced into the legal system and into planning practice, from which a significant contribution to the urban development of the country is expected. Countries have different models of LR, which are adjusted to the particular conditions specific for that society. This is to be expected, having in mind the specificity of each country. This paper presents the development of land readjustment models which are adjusted to Serbia, but could also be used in the countries of South-East Europe, considering that the predominant conditions are similar. The most important item in this process is defining the key elements which determine the nature of the model: the existence and appropriateness of the urban plan and the distribution of benefits from increased land value. The paper also presents a case study of LR implementation on the basis of defined models, after which an analysis of the outcomes is presented. It is concluded that by applying the LR models presented, numerous significant issues that occurred in the past can be solved.

Suggested Citation

  • Mladen Šoškić & Nenad Višnjevac & Rajica Mihajlović & Dragan Mihajlović & Stevan Marošan, 2022. "The Development of Land Readjustment Models in Serbia and South-East Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:834-:d:830369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/834/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/834/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miodrag Roić & Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac, 2021. "An Approach to Resolve Inconsistencies of Data in the Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Muñoz Gielen, Demetrio & Mualam, Nir, 2019. "A framework for analyzing the effectiveness and efficiency of land readjustment regulations: Comparison of Germany, Spain and Israel," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Adam, Achamyeleh Gashu, 2019. "Thinking outside the box and introducing land readjustment against the conventional urban land acquisition and delivery method in Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 624-631.
    4. Golob, Peter & Lisec, Anka, 2022. "Success factors in cadastral boundary settlements based on land surveyor’s opinions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Dieter Rink & Chris Couch & Annegret Haase & Robert Krzysztofik & Bogdan Nadolu & Petr Rumpel, 2014. "The governance of urban shrinkage in cities of post-socialist Europe: policies, strategies and actors," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 258-277, September.
    6. Delgado, Alina & Scheers, Joris, 2021. "Participatory process for land readjustment as a strategy to gain the right to territory: The case of San José–Samborondón–Guayaquil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goździewicz-Biechońska, Justyna & Brzezińska-Rawa, Anna, 2022. "Protecting ecosystem services of urban agriculture against land-use change using market-based instruments. A Polish perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Bacior, Stanisław, 2023. "Austrian Cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. García Fermín, Erika, 2024. "From sleeping beauty to proven solution: The transformation of land readjustment into an informal settlement upgrading tool," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Chikako Ishizuka & Kei Aoki, 2024. "Drivers of sustained brand engagement: cases of long-term customers of hedonic and utilitarian brands in Japan," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(4), pages 979-989, December.
    5. Uzun, Bayram & Atasoy, Bura Adem & Celik Simsek, Nida, 2022. "Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) support for subdivision phase of land readjustment: A case study from Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Andrew Allan & Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Melika Zarei, 2022. "Driving Forces behind Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Demetrio, Muñoz Gielen & Francisco, Blanc Clavero & Burcher, James Corbet & Juan Felipe, Pinilla, 2023. "The role of jurisprudence in public value capture in urban development: A comparative analysis from Dutch, English, Spanish and Colombian courts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    8. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Hubert Frąszczak, 2021. "Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Aura-Luciana Istrate & Vojtěch Bosák & Alexandr Nováček & Ondřej Slach, 2020. "How Attractive for Walking Are the Main Streets of a Shrinking City?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Bartłomiej T. Sroka, 2022. "Urban Shrinkage as a Catalyst of a Transition, Revolving around Definitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-12, October.
    11. Ruiying Liu, 2022. "Long-Term Development Perspectives in the Slow Crisis of Shrinkage: Strategies of Coping and Exiting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-30, August.
    12. Iwona Kantor-Pietraga, 2021. "Does One Decade of Urban Policy for the Shrinking City Make Visible Progress in Urban Re-Urbanization? A Case Study of Bytom, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Elvestad, Helén Elisabeth & Holsen, Terje, 2024. "Valuation practices in urban land readjustment cases in Norway," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    14. Maksymilian Solarski & Robert Krzysztofik, 2021. "Is the Naturalization of the Townscape a Condition of De-Industrialization? An Example of Bytom in Southern Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    16. Wang, Ge & Li, Xiaoqiu & Gao, Yingjie & Zeng, Chen & Wang, Bingkun & Li, Xiangyu & Li, Xintong, 2023. "How does land consolidation drive rural industrial development? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of 32 land consolidation cases in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    17. Mavrot, Céline & Potluka, Oto & Balzer, Lars & Eicher, Véronique & Haunberger, Sigrid & Heuer, Christine & Viallon, François-Xavier, 2025. "What evaluation criteria are used in policy evaluation research: A cross-field literature review," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Yilmaz, Ahmet & Bi̇li̇m, Nazım Serdar, 2024. "The role of land values in land policies: The case of Turkish land readjustment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Zaiga Krisjane & Maris Berzins & Janis Krumins & Elina Apsite‐Berina & Sindija Balode, 2023. "Uneven geographies: ageing and population dynamics in Latvia," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 893-908, May.
    20. Nir Mualam & Andreas Hendricks & Vida Maliene & Eyal Salinger, 2021. "Value Capture and Vertical Allocations of Public Amenities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:834-:d:830369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.