IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i4p528-d1376658.html

Navigating the Terrain of Digital Transition: Ghana’s Journey of Developing a Digital Land Information System

Author

Listed:
  • Rosemond Owusu Ansah

    (The Hague Pathway College, The University of Applied Sciences, 2521 EN Hague, The Netherlands)

  • Zaid Abubakari

    (Department Land Management, Faculty of Planning and Land Management, Simon Diedong Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies, Wa P.O. Box W64, Ghana)

  • Benjamin Quaye

    (Lands Commission, Cantonments, Accra P.O. Box CT 5008, Ghana)

  • Dimo Todorovski

    (Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Chipofya Malumbo

    (Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Christiaan Lemmen

    (Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This paper explores Ghana’s two-decade journey in developing a digital land information system (LIS), exemplified by Ghana Enterprise Land Information System (GELIS) and Enterprise Land Information System (ELIS). Despite advancements by Ghana’s Lands Commission, manual processes persist and coexist with digital ones. Our study uses a qualitative approach to assess the effectiveness of the LIS implemented in Accra. This study found that Accra’s LIS is highly aligned with clear institutional mandates, roles, and responsibilities, as well as the availability of laws and policies to support analogue-to-digital conversion. Furthermore, a robust approach to protecting the data, operating system, and software underpins the system. Subsequently, the integration of a digital LIS has enhanced service delivery and accountability. Nonetheless, Accra’s LIS is still at the beginning of a comprehensive learning and development curve. Sustaining the LIS requires furtherance in the implementation plan, funding, law implementation, ICT strategy, divisional integration, work processes, data quality, and communication strategy. These findings will inform the next steps of improvement for Accra’s LIS and guide its nationwide scaling, contributing to discussions on technology acceptance dynamics in predominantly analogue environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosemond Owusu Ansah & Zaid Abubakari & Benjamin Quaye & Dimo Todorovski & Chipofya Malumbo & Christiaan Lemmen, 2024. "Navigating the Terrain of Digital Transition: Ghana’s Journey of Developing a Digital Land Information System," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:528-:d:1376658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/528/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/528/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:2376 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Zenoveva X. Correia & Antoni B. Moore & David P. Goodwin, 2021. "Accessibility of land data and information integration in recently‐independent countries: Timor‐Leste case study," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(1), pages 203-225, February.
    3. Mireille Biraro & Jaap Zevenbergen & Berhanu Kefale Alemie, 2021. "Good Practices in Updating Land Information Systems that Used Unconventional Approaches in Systematic Land Registration," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Lengoiboni, Monica & Richter, Christine & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2019. "Cross-cutting challenges to innovation in land tenure documentation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 21-32.
    5. Zeng, Zhongping & Cleon, Christian Bobby, 2018. "Factors affecting the adoption of a land information system: An empirical analysis in Liberia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 353-362.
    6. Prince Donkor Ameyaw & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "Toward Smart Land Management: Land Acquisition and the Associated Challenges in Ghana. A Look into a Blockchain Digital Land Registry for Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Prince Donkor Ameyaw & Walter Timo de Vries, 2020. "Transparency of Land Administration and the Role of Blockchain Technology, a Four-Dimensional Framework Analysis from the Ghanaian Land Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Bennett, Rohan Mark & Pickering, M. & Sargent, J., 2019. "Transformations, transitions, or tall tales? A global review of the uptake and impact of NoSQL, blockchain, and big data analytics on the land administration sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 435-448.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stöcker, Claudia & Bennett, Rohan & Koeva, Mila & Nex, Francesco & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2022. "Scaling up UAVs for land administration: Towards the plateau of productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Ivana Racetin & Jelena Kilić Pamuković & Mladen Zrinjski & Marina Peko, 2022. "Blockchain-Based Land Management for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Ayelech Kidie Mengesha & Thomas Bauer & Doris Damyanovic & Sayeh Kassaw Agegnehu & Reinfried Mansberger & Gernot Stoeglehner, 2022. "Gender Analysis of Landholding and Situation of Female-Headed Households after Land Registration: The Case of Machakel Woreda," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Ameyaw, Prince Donkor & de Vries, Walter Timo, 2023. "Blockchain technology adaptation for land administration services: The importance of socio-cultural elements," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Rohan Bennett & Todd Miller & Mark Pickering & Al-Karim Kara, 2021. "Hybrid Approaches for Smart Contracts in Land Administration: Lessons from Three Blockchain Proofs-of-Concept," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Ayanwale, Adeolu & Kehinde, Ayodeji D., 2025. "Determinants of use of digital innovation and its impact on land acquisition and food security among farming households in Nigeria," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    7. Zaid Abubakari & Christine Richter & Jaap Zevenbergen, 2020. "Evaluating Some Major Assumptions in Land Registration: Insights from Ghana’s Context of Land Tenure and Registration," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Ghulam Mustafa & Muhammad Hamza Amjad, 2025. "Transforming Real Estate in Pakistan through Blockchain: An Agent-Based Simulations Study," PIDE-Working Papers 2025:12, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    9. Kabigi, B. & de Vries, Walter T. & Kelvin, H., 2021. "A neo-institutional analysis of alternative land registration systems in Tanzania: The cases of Babati and Iringa districts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    10. Laila Junaid & Kashif Bilal & Osman Khalid & Aiman Erbad, 2023. "Blockchain-Enabled land management systems," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 421-442, November.
    11. Sundarakani, Balan & Ajaykumar, Aneesh & Gunasekaran, Angappa, 2021. "Big data driven supply chain design and applications for blockchain: An action research using case study approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Ana García-Morán & Simon Ulvund & Eva-Maria Unger & Rohan Mark Bennett, 2021. "Exploring PPPs in Support of Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration: A Case Study from Côte d’Ivoire," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Daxini, Amar & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Ryan, Mary & Buckley, Cathal & Barnes, Andrew P., 2018. "Factors influencing farmers' intentions to adopt nutrient management planning: accounting for heterogeneity," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276183, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Prishchepov, Alexander V. & Ponkina, Elena V. & Sun, Zhanli & Bavorova, Miroslava & Yekimovskaja, Olga A., 2021. "Revealing the intentions of farmers to recultivate abandoned farmland: A case study of the Buryat Republic in Russia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Bouchra El Houda Lamhamedi & Walter Timo de Vries, 2022. "An Exploration of the Land–(Renewable) Energy Nexus," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Hosseini, Hamid & Atazadeh, Behnam & Rajabifard, Abbas, 2025. "Towards intelligent land administration systems: Research challenges, applications and prospects in AI-driven approaches," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Ansah, Barikisa Owusu & Voss, Winrich & Asiama, Kwabena Obeng & Wuni, Ibrahim Yahaya, 2023. "A systematic review of the institutional success factors for blockchain-based land administration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    19. Abebaw Andarge Gedefaw, 2023. "Analysis of the Contribution of Land Registration to Sustainable Land Management in East Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Pierre-François Blin & Trias Aditya & Purnama Budi Santosa & Christophe Claramunt, 2023. "A Methodological Approach towards Cyber Risk Management in Land Administrations Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:528-:d:1376658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.