IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i9p508-d1748722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Ambidexterity: How Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Activity-Based Costing (ABC) Enable Exploration–Exploitation Synergy and Sustainable Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Abdullah Saad Al-Dhubaibi

    (Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 46451, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This study investigates how management accounting systems (MASs), specifically the balanced scorecard (BSC) and activity-based costing (ABC), foster organizational ambidexterity (OA) and, in turn, enhance firm performance. Drawing on the resource-based view, theory of constraints, and the ambidexterity literature, this research explores whether BSC and ABC act as enablers of the exploration–exploitation balance necessary for long-term competitiveness. A quantitative survey design was employed, targeting large- and medium-sized organizations in Saudi Arabia. Data from 186 valid responses were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the proposed relationships. The results provide robust empirical evidence that both BSC and ABC significantly contribute to OA. While BSC indirectly enhances organizational performance through OA, ABC exerts a direct positive effect on performance. Furthermore, higher levels of OA were found to significantly improve business outcomes, confirming its role as a critical mediator of strategic and operational success. The study makes three key contributions: First, it validates the role of MASs in building ambidextrous capabilities that enable firms to balance efficiency with innovation. Second, it demonstrates the complementary effects of BSC and ABC in driving superior organizational performance. Third, it highlights the strategic value of MASs in aligning organizational practices with sustainable development goals, thereby reconciling short-term profitability with long-term growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Abdullah Saad Al-Dhubaibi, 2025. "Organizational Ambidexterity: How Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Activity-Based Costing (ABC) Enable Exploration–Exploitation Synergy and Sustainable Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:508-:d:1748722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/508/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/508/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 2001. "Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 349-410, December.
    2. repec:eme:maj000:02686900510625325 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Corina GAVREA & Liviu ILIEŞ & Roxana STEGEREAN, 2011. "Determinants Of Organizational Performance: The Case Of Romania," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 6(2), Summer.
    4. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Lillis, Anne M., 1995. "The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 241-258, May.
    5. Appelbaum, Deniz & Kogan, Alexander & Vasarhelyi, Miklos & Yan, Zhaokai, 2017. "Impact of business analytics and enterprise systems on managerial accounting," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 29-44.
    6. S. Hoozee & W. Bruggeman, 2010. "Identifying operational improvements during the design process of a time-driven ABC system: The role of collective worker participation and leadership style," Post-Print hal-00679954, HAL.
    7. Sandra Cohen & George Venieris & Efrosini Kaimenaki, 2005. "ABC: adopters, supporters, deniers and unawares," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(9), pages 981-1000, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindawati Gani & Johnny Jermias, 2012. "The Effects of Strategy–Management Control System Misfits on Firm Performance," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 165-196, September.
    2. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F. & Randall, Taylor, 2003. "Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(7-8), pages 715-741.
    3. Zhang, Chao & Zhu, Weidong & Dai, Jun & Wu, Yong & Chen, Xulong, 2023. "Ethical impact of artificial intelligence in managerial accounting," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    4. Iryna Alves & Sofia M. Lourenço, 2022. "The use of non-financial performance measures for managerial compensation: evidence from SMEs," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 151-187, June.
    5. van Veen-Dirks, Paula, 2010. "Different uses of performance measures: The evaluation versus reward of production managers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 141-164, February.
    6. Maria-Victòria Sánchez-Rebull & Angels Niñerola & Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara, 2023. "After 30 Years, What Has Happened to Activity-Based Costing? A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    7. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    8. Ippolito, Adelaide & Sorrentino, Marco & Guardato, Luisa & Marcello, Raffaele & Paolone, Giuseppe, 2024. "The paradoxes of the reengineering of information flows for management control: A case study in a public university hospital," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    9. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 529-558, August.
    10. Kaveh Asiaei & Nick Bontis & Omid Barani & Ruzita Jusoh, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and sustainability performance measurement systems: implications for organizational performance," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 85-126, March.
    11. Maël Schnegg & Klaus Möller, 2022. "Strategies for data analytics projects in business performance forecasting: a field study," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 241-271, June.
    12. Paolo Perego & Frank Hartmann, 2009. "Aligning Performance Measurement Systems With Strategy: The Case of Environmental Strategy," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(4), pages 397-428, December.
    13. Wilkin, Carla & Ferreira, Aldónio & Rotaru, Kristian & Gaerlan, Luigi Red, 2020. "Big data prioritization in SCM decision-making: Its role and performance implications," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    14. Verbeeten, F.H.M., 2005. "New’ Performance Measures: Determinants of Their Use and Their Impact on Performance," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-054-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    15. van Veen-Dirks, Paula, 2005. "Management control and the production environment: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 263-272, January.
    16. Sebastian Wagener, 2024. "Accounting for the middle: motivations, extent, and limitations of middle managers’ earnings management," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 225-277, February.
    17. Demartini, Maria Chiara & Otley, David, 2020. "Beyond the system vs. package dualism in Performance Management Systems design: A loose coupling approach," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Vagnoni, Emidia, 2004. "Power, organization design and managerial behaviour," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 207-225.
    19. Jana Fibírová, 2008. "The Competitive Advantage of Management Accounting [Konkurenční výhoda manažerského účetnictví]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(2), pages 78-90.
    20. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait & Arkadiusz Babczuk, 2022. "Can the Economic Value Added Be Used as the Universal Financial Metric?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:508-:d:1748722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.