IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i8p413-d1710654.html

Predicting Environmental Social and Governance Scores: Applying Machine Learning Models to French Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Sina Belkhiria

    (Higher Institute of Management, GEF2A-Lab, University of Tunis, Tunis 2000, Tunisia)

  • Azhaar Lajmi

    (Higher Institute of Management, GEF2A-Lab, University of Tunis, Tunis 2000, Tunisia)

  • Siwar Sayed

    (Higher Institute of Management, University of Tunis, Tunis 2000, Tunisia)

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to analyse the relevance of financial performance as an accurate predictor of ESG scores for French companies from 2010 to 2022. To this end, Machine Learning techniques such as linear regression, polynomial regression, Random Forest, and Support Vector Regression (SVR) were employed to provide more accurate and reliable assessments, thus informing the ESG rating attribution process. The results obtained highlight the excellent performance of the Random Forest method in predicting ESG scores from company financial variables. In addition, the approach identified specific financial variables (operating income, market capitalisation, enterprise value, etc.) that act as powerful predictors of companies’ ESG scores. This modelling approach offers a robust tool for predicting companies’ ESG scores from financial data, which can be valuable for investors and decision-makers wishing to assess and understand the impact of financial variables on corporate sustainability. Also, this allows sustainability investors to diversify their portfolios by including companies that are not currently rated by ESG rating agencies, that do not produce sustainability reports, as well as newly listed companies. It also gives companies the opportunity to identify areas where improvements are needed to enhance their ESG performance. Finally, it facilitates access to ESG ratings for interested external stakeholders. Our study focuses on using advances in artificial intelligence, exploring machine learning techniques to develop a reliable predictive model of ESG scores, which is proving to be an original and promising area of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Sina Belkhiria & Azhaar Lajmi & Siwar Sayed, 2025. "Predicting Environmental Social and Governance Scores: Applying Machine Learning Models to French Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:413-:d:1710654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/8/413/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/8/413/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valeria D’Amato & Rita D’Ecclesia & Susanna Levantesi, 2021. "Fundamental ratios as predictors of ESG scores: a machine learning approach," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(2), pages 1087-1110, December.
    2. Giuliana Birindelli & Stefano Dell’Atti & Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi & Marco Savioli, 2018. "Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Caterina De Lucia & Pasquale Pazienza & Mark Bartlett, 2020. "Does Good ESG Lead to Better Financial Performances by Firms? Machine Learning and Logistic Regression Models of Public Enterprises in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-29, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jolanta Słoniec & Monika Kulisz & Marta Małecka-Dobrogowska & Zhadyra Konurbayeva & Łukasz Sobaszek, 2025. "Awareness of the Impact of IT/AI on Energy Consumption in Enterprises: A Machine Learning-Based Modelling Towards a Sustainable Digital Transformation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Sha, Xiaowen & Su, Miao, 2026. "Ownership, regulation, and ESG in transport and logistics: Insights for policy from explainable machine learning," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taskin, Dilvin & Sariyer, Görkem & Acar, Ece & Cagli, Efe Caglar, 2025. "Do past ESG scores efficiently predict future ESG performance?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Inigo Martin-Melero & Raul Gomez-Martinez & Maria Luisa Medrano-Garcia & Felipe Hernandez-Perlines, 2025. "Comparison of sectorial and financial data for ESG scoring of mutual funds with machine learning," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-31, December.
    3. Trotta, Annarita & Rania, Francesco & Strano, Eugenia, 2024. "Exploring the linkages between FinTech and ESG: A bibliometric perspective," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Sha, Xiaowen & Su, Miao, 2026. "Ownership, regulation, and ESG in transport and logistics: Insights for policy from explainable machine learning," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Hanan Qudah, 2026. "Tracing the development of environmental, social and governance (ESG) performs: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Scholz, Robert, 2023. "Unternehmensmitbestimmung und die sozialökologische Transformation: Zusammenhang zwischen Mitbestimmungsindex und ESG-Kriterien in börsennotierten Unternehmen," Mitbestimmungsreport 79, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    7. Alena Kocmanová & Marie Pavláková Dočekalová & Tomáš Meluzín & Stanislav Škapa, 2020. "Sustainable Investing Model for Decision Makers (Based On Research of Manufacturing Industry in the Czech Republic)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
    8. Mithilesh Gidage & Shilpa Bhide & Yuriy Bilan, 2025. "Greenwashing in the Indian corporate landscape: an empirical assessment of ESG disclosures of NIFTY 50 companies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 21861-21885, September.
    9. Tim Heubeck & Annina Ahrens, 2025. "Governing the Responsible Investment of Slack Resources in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance: How Beneficial are CSR Committees?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 365-385, May.
    10. Abusharbeh, Mohammed & Hanaysha, Jalal Rajeh & Samara, Husni, 2025. "The interactive effect of environmental management team with board attributes on sustainability pillars: Evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Grazia Dicuonzo & Francesca Donofrio & Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi & Vittorio Dell’Atti, 2022. "The integration of sustainability in corporate governance systems: an innovative framework applied to the European systematically important banks," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 249-263, September.
    12. Doğan, Murat & Sayılır, Özlem & Komath, Muhammed Aslam Chelery & Çimen, Emre, 2025. "Prediction of market value of firms with corporate sustainability performance data using machine learning models," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    13. Melinda Cahyaning Ratri & Iman Harymawan & Khairul Anuar Kamarudin, 2021. "Busyness, Tenure, Meeting Frequency of the CEOs, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Kaouther Chebbi & Mohammed Abdullah Ammer, 2022. "Board Composition and ESG Disclosure in Saudi Arabia: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance Reforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    15. Camélia Radu & Nadia Smaili, 2022. "Alignment Versus Monitoring: An Examination of the Effect of the CSR Committee and CSR-Linked Executive Compensation on CSR Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 145-163, September.
    16. Francesco Gangi & Nicola Varrone & Maria Coscia, 2023. "Board cultural diversity and bank social performance: The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 1310-1320, October.
    17. repec:osf:socarx:r56hu_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Shuchi Pahuja & Anita Agrawal, 2023. "Board Attributes and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Perspectives," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 16(1), pages 108-138, June.
    19. Gooßen, Finn Matthes, 2025. "The impact of female board members on ESG performance: An empirical analysis," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 10(4), pages 940-965.
    20. Wu Ning & Ummar Faruk Saeed & Angelina Kissiwaa Twum & Abednego Osei, 2024. "Can ESG disclosures promote firms going concern? Evidence from BRICS countries," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3792-3803, September.
    21. Agnese, Paolo & De Masi, Francesco & Porretta, Pasqualina & Santoboni, Fabrizio, 2024. "Sustainable or not sustainable pension fund: This is the question. The case of environmental social governance policies in the Italian pension system," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:413-:d:1710654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.