IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i6p295-d1666031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Family Firms on Financial Reporting Quality: The Mediating Role of High-Quality Auditors

Author

Listed:
  • Hendra Susanto

    (Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang 30662, Indonesia)

  • Nyoman Adhi Suryadnyana

    (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia, Jakarta 10043, Indonesia)

  • Emita Astami

    (Fakultas Bisnis dan Humaniora, Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55285, Indonesia)

  • Rusmin Rusmin

    (Fakultas Bisnis dan Humaniora, Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55285, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study empirically examines how Big4 audit firms mediate the relationship between family-controlled enterprises and their earnings management practices. Analyzing a dataset of 61 non-financial family-listed companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2017 through 2019 reveals that family-controlled businesses and Big4 auditors are associated with lower earnings management, resulting in improved financial reporting quality. The study also shows that family-owned enterprises are more inclined to hire a higher-quality auditing firm for their financial statement assessments. Moreover, our results suggest that Big4 auditors partially mediate the relationship between family businesses and their earnings management practices. The additional tests conducted in this study highlight the significant role of family-run firms and Big4 auditors in curbing earnings management, primarily when corporate management is prone to decrease reported earnings. Robustness tests validate the reliability of the conclusions drawn from the primary findings. Our study shows that family managers align their goals with the firm and shareholders, enhancing company financial reporting integrity. Our finding also emphasizes the crucial role of Big4 auditors in minimizing intra-family agency conflicts in family firms, promoting transparency, and aligning family managers’ interests with external stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Hendra Susanto & Nyoman Adhi Suryadnyana & Emita Astami & Rusmin Rusmin, 2025. "The Impact of Family Firms on Financial Reporting Quality: The Mediating Role of High-Quality Auditors," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:295-:d:1666031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/6/295/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/6/295/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorenzo Patelli & Annalisa Prencipe, 2007. "The Relationship between Voluntary Disclosure and Independent Directors in the Presence of a Dominant Shareholder," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 5-33.
    2. Ferdinand A. Gul, 2006. "Auditors' Response to Political Connections and Cronyism in Malaysia," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(5), pages 931-963, December.
    3. Ferdinand A. Gul & Charles J. P. Chen & Judy S. L. Tsui, 2003. "Discretionary Accounting Accruals, Managers' Incentives, and Audit Fees," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), pages 441-464, September.
    4. Gul, Ferdinand A. & Fung, Simon Yu Kit & Jaggi, Bikki, 2009. "Earnings quality: Some evidence on the role of auditor tenure and auditors' industry expertise," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 265-287, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costa, Mabel D. & Habib, Ahsan, 2023. "Local creative culture and audit fees," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    2. Wen, Fenghua & Chen, Meng & Zhang, Yun & Miao, Xiao, 2023. "Oil price uncertainty and audit fees: Evidence from the energy industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Xin Qu & Daifei Yao & Majella Percy, 2020. "How the Design of CEO Equity-Based Compensation can Lead to Lower Audit Fees: Evidence from Australia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 281-308, May.
    4. Mohamed Khalil & Sandy Harianto & Yilmaz Guney, 2022. "Do political connections reduce earnings management?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 273-310, July.
    5. Yik-Pui Low, Steven & Foo, Yee-Boon & Gul, Ferdinand A, 2023. "Corporate lobbying: Resource-seeking or rent-seeking? Evidence from audit fees," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    6. Sarowar Hossain & Jenny Jing Wang, 2023. "Abnormal audit fees and audit quality: Australian evidence," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(3), pages 596-624, August.
    7. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    8. Bliss, Mark A. & Gul, Ferdinand A., 2012. "Political connection and leverage: Some Malaysian evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2344-2350.
    9. Garcia-Blandon, Josep & Argiles-Bosch, Josep Maria & Castillo-Merino, David & Martinez-Blasco, Monica, 2017. "An Assessment of the Provisions of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 on Non-audit Services and Audit Firm Tenure: Evidence from Spain," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 251-261.
    10. Chisazn , Elham & Noravesh , Iraj & Momeni , Mansour, 2019. "Providing a pattern of disclosure and transparency of information in banks," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 14(1), pages 101-132, January.
    11. Astrid Rudyanto, 2017. "Audit Firm Reputation versus Auditor Capability: Their Effect on Audit Quality in Indonesia," GATR Journals afr147, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    12. Samuel Jebaraj Benjamin, 2019. "The Effect of Financial Constraints on Audit Fees," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 59-87.
    13. Bhuiyan, Md. Borhan Uddin & Rahman, Asheq & Sultana, Nigar, 2020. "Female tainted directors, financial reporting quality and audit fees," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    14. Alzoubi, Ebraheem Saleem Salem, 2018. "Audit quality, debt financing, and earnings management: Evidence from Jordan," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 69-84.
    15. Liwei Shan & Albert Tsang & Xiaoxue Zhang, 2024. "Transporting Audit Quality Across Countries: Returnee CEOs and Audit Fees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(4), pages 845-874, July.
    16. Rupjyoti Saha & K. C. Kabra, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Voluntary Disclosure: A Synthesis of Empirical Studies," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(2), pages 117-138, July.
    17. Mehdi Nekhili & Fahim Javed & Haithem Nagati, 2022. "Audit Partner Gender, Leadership and Ethics: The Case of Earnings Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 233-260, May.
    18. Jinghui Sun & Liuchuang Li & Baolei Qi, 2022. "Financial statement comparability and audit pricing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(5), pages 4631-4661, December.
    19. Sunusi Garba* & Mudzamir Bin Mohamed, 2018. "Ownership Structure and Profitability: The Moderating Effect of Audit Committee Financial Expertise," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 396-401:6.
    20. Kang, Chang-Mo & Kim, Donghyun, 2022. "Risk management transparency and compensation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:295-:d:1666031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.