IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i5p253-d1650591.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Tax Planning Incentives in the Use of Earnouts in Taxable Acquisitions

Author

Listed:
  • Dennis Ahn

    (Fowler College of Business, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA)

  • Terry Shevlin

    (The Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
    Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

Abstract

In an acquisition, an earnout is a component of transaction price that is contingent upon future events. Despite its usefulness to acquirers in mitigating valuation risk, using an earnout also has a potentially undesirable tax consequence for the acquirer because there is no immediate step-up in tax basis for the earnout portion of deal consideration until the resolution of associated contingencies. We thus hypothesize that acquiring firms with high marginal tax rates (MTRs) are less likely to use earnouts. We analyze a sample of taxable acquisitions by U.S. public companies, holding constant other non-tax determinants of earnout use from prior research, and we find results consistent with our prediction. We also find some evidence that strong tax incentives can offset the effect of target valuation uncertainty, suggesting that acquiring firms facing sufficiently high MTRs are willing to trade off mitigating valuation risk for a full, immediate step-up in tax basis. We contribute to the prior literature on determinants of earnout use as well as the role of tax planning incentives in firm choices within mergers and acquisitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis Ahn & Terry Shevlin, 2025. "The Role of Tax Planning Incentives in the Use of Earnouts in Taxable Acquisitions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-29, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:253-:d:1650591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/253/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/253/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Lynch & Miles Romney & Bridget Stomberg & Daniel Wangerin & John R. Robinson, 2019. "Trade‐offs between Tax and Financial Reporting Benefits: Evidence from Purchase Price Allocations in Taxable Acquisitions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 1223-1262, September.
    2. Luca Viarengo & Stefano Gatti & Annalisa Prencipe, 2018. "Enforcement quality and the use of earnouts in M&A transactions: International evidence," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3-4), pages 437-481, March.
    3. T. J. Atwood & Christina Lewellen, 2019. "The Complementarity between Tax Avoidance and Manager Diversion: Evidence from Tax Haven Firms," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 259-294, March.
    4. Blouin, Jennifer & Core, John E. & Guay, Wayne, 2010. "Have the tax benefits of debt been overestimated?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 195-213, November.
    5. Dahlen, Niklas & Lahmann, Alexander & Schreiter, Maximilian, 2024. "Panacea for M&A dealmaking? Investor perceptions of earnouts," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    6. Erickson, Merle & Wang, Shiing-wu, 2000. "The effect of transaction structure on price: Evidence from subsidiary sales," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 59-97, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hines Jr., James R., 2010. "Income misattribution under formula apportionment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 108-120, January.
    2. Martina Rechbauer & Silke Rünger, 2024. "Measuring the impact of tax loss carryforwards on capital structure choice: the accuracy of earnings-based proxies," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1681-1708, June.
    3. Benjamin C. Ayers & Craig E. Lefanowicz & John R. Robinson, 2007. "Capital Gains Taxes and Acquisition Activity: Evidence of the Lock†in Effect," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 315-344, June.
    4. Wang, Jiawei (Brooke), 2023. "Natural disasters and firm leasing: A collateral channel," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Gu, Tiantian, 2017. "U.S. multinationals and cash holdings," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 344-368.
    6. Kruschwitz, Lutz & Löffler, Andreas, 2015. "Marginal tax rates under asymmetric taxation," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 191, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    7. Duan, Ran, 2023. "Patent trolls and capital structure decisions in high-tech firms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Luis Araujo & Bernardo Guimaraes & Diego Rodrigues, 2020. "Financial constraints and collateral crises," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 38, pages 238-250, October.
    9. Mihir A. Desai & William M. Gentry, 2004. "The Character and Determinants of Corporate Capital Gains," NBER Chapters, in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 18, pages 1-36, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Dana Hollie & Philip B. Shane & Qiuhong Zhao & Steven Cahan, 2017. "The role of financial analysts in stock market efficiency with respect to annual earnings and its cash and accrual components," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(1), pages 199-237, March.
    11. Yusheng Kong & Fahad Javed & Jahanzaib Sultan & Muhammad Shehzad Hanif & Noheed Khan, 2022. "EMA Implementation and Corporate Environmental Firm Performance: A Comparison of Institutional Pressures and Environmental Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    12. Garman, Amy D. & Kubick, Thomas R., 2025. "Mitigating risk-shifting in corporate pension plans: Evidence from stakeholder constituency statutes," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(1).
    13. Elena MELIA-MARTI & Ana Maria MARTINEZ-GARCIA, 2015. "Characterization And Analysis Of Cooperative Mergers And Their Results," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(3), pages 479-504, September.
    14. Feld, Lars P. & Heckemeyer, Jost H. & Overesch, Michael, 2013. "Capital structure choice and company taxation: A meta-study," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2850-2866.
    15. Xu, Jin, 2012. "Profitability and capital structure: Evidence from import penetration," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 427-446.
    16. José A. Clemente-Almendros & Francisco Sogorb-Mira, 2016. "The effect of taxes on the debt policy of spanish listed companies," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 359-391, August.
    17. Abdullah Almutairi & Baban Eulaiwi & Robert Evans & Grantley Taylor, 2023. "Tax Haven Use and Related‐Party Transactions: Evidence from Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(4), pages 352-374, December.
    18. Oded Rozenbaum, 2019. "EBITDA and Managers' Investment and Leverage Choices," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 513-546, March.
    19. Clemente-Almendros, José A. & Sogorb-Mira, Francisco, 2018. "Costs of debt, tax benefits and a new measure of non-debt tax shields: examining debt conservatism in Spanish listed firms," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 162-175.
    20. Barclay, Michael J. & Heitzman, Shane M. & Smith, Clifford W., 2013. "Debt and taxes: Evidence from the real estate industry," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 74-93.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:253-:d:1650591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.