IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i8p325-d1443830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trading Volume Concentration across S&P 500 Index Constituents—A Gini-Based Analysis and Concentration-Driven (Daily Rebalanced) Portfolio Performance Evaluation: Is Chasing Concentration Profitable?

Author

Listed:
  • Dominik Metelski

    (SEJ-609 AMIKO Research Group, Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Janusz Sobieraj

    (Department of Building Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-637 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The period from January 2020 to December 2022 was marked by a confluence of major events, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia–Ukraine war, the energy crisis, surging inflation, Federal Reserve policy shifts, and banking turmoil, which collectively fueled heightened market volatility, risk management needs, and speculative trading opportunities, leading to volatile swings in trading volume concentration across financial markets, with periods of significant increases followed by rapid declines. This paper examines the variation in the concentration of trading volume across the full spectrum of S&P 500 companies, with a focus on explaining the reasons behind the stochastic changes in trading volume concentration. We analyze different concentration measurement methods, including the power law exponent, the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index, and the Gini-based Trading Concentration Index (TCI). The research employs a novel experimental design, comparing a concentration-driven portfolio, rebalanced daily based on the top 30 stocks by trading volume, against the S&P 500 benchmark. Our findings reveal that the Gini-based TCI fluctuated between 55.98% and 77.35% during the study period, with significant variations coinciding with major market events. The concentration-driven portfolio outperformed the S&P 500, achieving an annualized return of 10.66% compared to 5.89% for the index, with a superior Sharpe ratio of 0.325 versus 0.19. This performance suggests that following trading volume concentration can yield above-average results. However, this study also highlights the importance of understanding and managing the risks associated with concentrated portfolios. This study contributes to the literature on market dynamics and offers practical insights for investors and fund managers on optimizing portfolio strategies in response to evolving concentration patterns in financial markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominik Metelski & Janusz Sobieraj, 2024. "Trading Volume Concentration across S&P 500 Index Constituents—A Gini-Based Analysis and Concentration-Driven (Daily Rebalanced) Portfolio Performance Evaluation: Is Chasing Concentration Profitable?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-25, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:325-:d:1443830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/325/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/325/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bogdan Batrinca & Christian W. Hesse & Philip C. Treleaven, 2018. "Examining drivers of trading volume in European markets," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 134-154, April.
    2. Ülkü, Numan & Ali, Fahad & Saydumarov, Saidgozi & İkizlerli, Deniz, 2023. "COVID caused a negative bubble. Who profited? Who lost? How stock markets changed?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Mr. Taehoon Kim, 2021. "Safe Asset Demand, Global Capital Flows and Wealth Concentration," IMF Working Papers 2021/254, International Monetary Fund.
    4. P. V. (Sundar) Balakrishnan & A. Steven Holland & James M. Miller & S. Gowri Shankar, 2013. "Market closings and concentration of stock trading: an empirical analysis," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(17), pages 1393-1398, September.
    5. John Duffy & Jean Paul Rabanal & Olga A. Rud, 2019. "The Impact of ETFs on Asset Markets: Experimental Evidence," Working Papers 154, Peruvian Economic Association.
    6. Dominik Metelski & Janusz Sobieraj, 2022. "Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Projects: A Study of Key Performance Indicators in Terms of DeFi Protocols’ Valuations," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Tao Shu, 2013. "Institutional Investor Participation and Stock Market Anomalies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(5-6), pages 695-718, June.
    8. David Mayer-Foulkes & Kurt A. Hafner, 2023. "The Economy Is Not Flat: The Technology Gradient In The Mass Market Economy," Global Economy Journal (GEJ), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01n04), pages 1-44, December.
    9. Geoffrey Parker & Georgios Petropoulos & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2021. "Platform mergers and antitrust," Bruegel Working Papers 43276, Bruegel.
    10. Geoffrey Parker & Georgios Petropoulos & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2021. "Platform mergers and antitrust," Bruegel Working Papers 40796, Bruegel.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Bounie & Antoine Dubus & Patrick Waelbroeck, 2021. "Competition and Mergers with Strategic Data Intermediaries," CESifo Working Paper Series 9339, CESifo.
    2. Hemant Bhargava & Antoine Dubus & David Ronayne & Shiva Shekhar, 2024. "The Strategic Value of Data Sharing in Interdependent Markets," CESifo Working Paper Series 10963, CESifo.
    3. Soltanzadeh, Javad & Blind, Knut & Elyasi, Mehdi, 2023. "Exploring how regulators face platform business issues in the lifecycle stages: Evidence of iranian ride-hailing platform business," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7).
    4. Simon Bruhn & Johanna Deperi, 2022. "The Contribution of Digital Firms to Productivity Growth in the Manufacturing Sector: A Decomposition Approach," GREDEG Working Papers 2022-42, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    5. Pauline Affeldt & Reinhold Kesler, 2021. "Competitors’ Reactions to Big Tech Acquisitions: Evidence from Mobile Apps," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1987, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Silva, Victo J. & Chiarini, Tulio & Ribeiro, Leonardo Costa, 2022. "The Brazilian digital platform economy: a first approach," SocArXiv d478v, Center for Open Science.
    7. repec:osf:socarx:d478v_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Jacobides, Michael G. & Cennamo, Carmelo & Gawer, Annabelle, 2024. "Externalities and complementarities in platforms and ecosystems: From structural solutions to endogenous failures," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    9. Anna Y. Stavniychuk & Olga À. Markova, 2023. "Acquire and leave”: Effects of startups acquisitions by digital ecosystems," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 14(5), pages 83-105, November.
    10. David Bounie & Antoine Dubus & Patrick Waelbroeck, 2023. "Competition Between Strategic Data Intermediaries with Implications for Merger Policy," Working Papers hal-03336520, HAL.
    11. Zelda Brutti & Luis E. Rojas, 2022. "M&A and early investment decisions by digital platforms," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(3), pages 509-543, September.
    12. Jerzy Niemczyk & Rafał Trzaska & Maciej Wilczyński & Kamil Borowski, 2021. "Business Models 4.0 Using Network Effects: Case Study of the Cyfrowy Polsat Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Thibault Schrepel, 2024. "A systematic content analysis of innovation in European competition law," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 355-395, October.
    14. Georgios Petropoulos & Bertin Martens & Marshall Van Alstyne & Geoffrey Parker, 2021. "Towards efficient information sharing in network markets," Bruegel Working Papers 45784, Bruegel.
    15. repec:grz:wpsses:2020-04 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Ghaemi Asl, Mahdi & Ben Jabeur, Sami, 2024. "Tail connectedness of DeFi and CeFi with accessible banking pillars: Unveiling novel insights through wavelet and quantile cross-spectral coherence analyses," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    17. Hwang, Yoontae & Park, Junpyo & Kim, Jang Ho & Lee, Yongjae & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2024. "Heterogeneous trading behaviors of individual investors: A deep clustering approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    18. Ali, Fahad & Khurram, Muhammad Usman & Sensoy, Ahmet & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2024. "Green cryptocurrencies and portfolio diversification in the era of greener paths," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    19. Yichen Luo & Yebo Feng & Jiahua Xu & Paolo Tasca, 2024. "Piercing the Veil of TVL: DeFi Reappraised," Papers 2404.11745, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    20. Javier Rojo‐Suárez & Ana Belén Alonso‐Conde & Ricardo Ferrero‐Pozo, 2022. "Liquidity, time‐varying betas and anomalies: Is the high trading activity enhancing the validity of the CAPM in the UK equity market?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 45-60, January.
    21. Arun Narayanasamy & Humnath Panta & Rohit Agarwal, 2023. "Relations among Bitcoin Futures, Bitcoin Spot, Investor Attention, and Sentiment," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, November.
    22. Remy Oben & Fezile Özdamlı, 2024. "Decentralized Finance (DeFi): Benefits, Risks, and RiskMitigation Strategies," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 53(3), pages 455-475, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:325-:d:1443830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.