IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i12p539-d1531696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging Corporate Assets and Talent to Attract Investors in Japan: A Country with an Innovation System Centered on Large Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Ryo Okuyama

    (College of International Management, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University, Beppu 874-8577, Japan)

Abstract

Drug discovery and development require significant costs and time, making investment acquisition crucial. However, there are few biopharmaceutical startups with high valuations in Japan. Unlike other countries, entrepreneurship in Japan is relatively inactive, and startups have a minimal presence in the drug-discovery field. Instead, in Japan’s innovation system, research and development (R&D) has been led by large incumbent companies, which are believed to have a wealth of promising assets and talent. This study tested the hypothesis that biopharmaceutical startups leveraging these assets and talent might be more attractive to investors by regression analysis using a dataset of Japanese unlisted biopharmaceutical startups. The results demonstrated that Japanese biopharmaceutical startups showed significantly higher valuations and total funding amounts if they were corporate spin-offs (CSOs). Additionally, they achieved significantly higher valuations and total funding amounts if their R&D lead persons had corporate backgrounds. These findings suggest that in Japan’s innovation system, which is centered on large companies, CSOs and startups leveraging R&D talent with corporate experience may be more appealing to investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryo Okuyama, 2024. "Leveraging Corporate Assets and Talent to Attract Investors in Japan: A Country with an Innovation System Centered on Large Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:539-:d:1531696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/12/539/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/12/539/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ono, Hiroshi, 2010. "Lifetime employment in Japan: Concepts and measurements," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Toole, Andrew A. & Czarnitzki, Dirk, 2007. "Biomedical academic entrepreneurship through the SBIR program," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 716-738, August.
    3. Max Berre & Benjamin Le Pendeven, 2023. "What do we know about startup-valuation drivers? A systematic literature review 1," Post-Print hal-04232855, HAL.
    4. Hanna Hottenrott & Bronwyn H. Hall & Dirk Czarnitzki, 2016. "Patents as quality signals? The implications for financing constraints on R&D," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 197-217, April.
    5. Hanna Hottenrott & Bronwyn H. Hall & Dirk Czarnitzki, 2016. "Patents as quality signals? The implications for financing constraints on R&D," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 197-217, April.
    6. Philip Joos & Alexei Zhdanov, 2008. "Earnings and Equity Valuation in the Biotech Industry: Theory and Evidence," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 37(3), pages 431-460, September.
    7. Max Berre & Benjamin Le Pendeven, 2023. "What do we know about startup-valuation drivers? A systematic literature review," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 385-429, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joern H. Block & Christian O. Fisch & Mirjam van Praag, 2017. "The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 61-95, January.
    2. Yin, Libo & Xin, Yu, 2024. "China's cognitive bias premium: An exploration of innovation information," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    3. Falavigna, Greta & Ippoliti, Roberto, 2023. "SMEs’ behavior under financial constraints: An empirical investigation on the legal environment and the substitution effect with tax arrears," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Becker, Annette & Hottenrott, Hanna & Mukherjee, Anwesha, 2022. "Division of labor in R&D? Firm size and specialization in corporate research," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1-23.
    5. Hyunchul Lee & Kyungtag Lee & Jong Ha Lee, 2021. "The Various Effects of Technology Trade on the Sustainable Market Value of Firms in OECD Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Masatoshi Kato & Koichiro Onishi & Yuji Honjo, 2022. "Does patenting always help new firm survival? Understanding heterogeneity among exit routes," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 449-475, August.
    7. Hussinger, Katrin & Palladini, Lorenzo, 2025. "Do China's special economic zones increase incentives to invest in R&D?," ZEW Discussion Papers 25-028, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    8. Bracht, Felix & Czarnitzki, Dirk, 2022. "Patent collateral and access to debt," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-033, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Sayili, Koray & Yilmaz, Gokhan & Dyer, Douglas & Küllü, A. Melih, 2017. "Style investing and firm innovation," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 17-29.
    10. Masatoshi Kato & Koichiro Onishi & Yuji Honjo, 2017. "Does patenting always help new-firm survival?," Discussion Paper Series 159, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised May 2017.
    11. Max Berre & Benjamin Le Pendeven, 2023. "What do we know about startup-valuation drivers? A systematic literature review 1," Post-Print hal-04232855, HAL.
    12. Melnik, Walter & Smyth, Andrew, 2024. "R&D tax credits and innovation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    13. Francesco Martielli & Vittorio Laus & Antonio Salvi & Anna Kotaskova, 2025. "Unlocking funding success: intercultural entrepreneurship dynamics in European startups," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-31, December.
    14. Hongxing Peng & Xinshu Mao & Jun Zhang, 2025. "Intellectual property protection, infringement disputes, and, corporate innovation investment persistence," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 61-84, January.
    15. KOUAKOU, Dorgyles C.M. & YEO, Kolotioloma I.H., 2023. "Can innovation reduce the size of the informal economy? Econometric evidence from 138 countries," MPRA Paper 119264, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Kong, Dongmin & Yang, Yiwei & Wang, Qin, 2023. "Innovative efficiency and firm value: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    17. Abdin, Joynal & Sharma, Abhijit & Trivedi, Rohit & Wang, Chengang, 2024. "Financing constraints, intellectual property rights protection and incremental innovation: Evidence from transition economy firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    18. Masatoshi KATO & Nicolas LEGENDRE & Hiroki YOSHIDA, 2022. "Does VC Investor Type Matter? Determinants and effects of VC backing for new firms in Japan," Discussion papers 22117, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    19. Koichiro ONISHI & Isamu YAMAUCHI, 2018. "Intellectual Property Rights for Software and Accessibility to Venture Capitalists," Discussion papers 18036, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    20. Nada Basir, 2020. "Reputation Enhancing Through Patent Portfolios: An Exploration of Lapsed Patents and IPOS," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 42-56, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:539-:d:1531696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.