IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2023i2p97-d1058851.html

Deconstructing Risk Factors for Predicting Risk Assessment in Supply Chains Using Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Guy Burstein

    (Department of Industrial Engineering & Management, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel)

  • Inon Zuckerman

    (Department of Industrial Engineering & Management, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel)

Abstract

Risk management is an ongoing process that includes several stages of mapping and identification, analysis, and evaluation, planning, and implementation to reduce risks and ensure ongoing control. Risk management along the supply chains has become more significant in recent years due to an increased complexity of the relationships between components in the chain as well as various disruptions such as climate change, COVID-19, or geo-political scenarios. The current literature alongside the increase in complexity and frequency of risk events, leads us to the single, most prominent challenge in risk management today: the auditor’s subjectivity in determining the risk levels. Simply stated, two different auditors may assess a given situation differently due to their specific history and experience. Specifically, it seems to be extremely difficult to find cases in which different auditors, working on the same organization, made the same risk assessment. With that in mind, this research aims to reduce the human subjectivity bias and reach a risk evaluation that is as objective as possible, by using the machine learning approach. For this aim the paper introduces a new risk assessment framework based on factors analysis and artificial neural network as the predictive model. We first introduced a new approach of deconstructing the risk factors into their basic elements and analyzing them as a feature vector. Next, we collected unique, real-world data of risk surveys and audit reports from 60 industrial companies of various industries (from plastic and metal factories to logistic and medical devices companies). Lastly, we constructed a neural network to predict the risk levels of operational processes in the industry. We trained our model on 42 samples and managed to achieve a R 2 score of 0.9 on the test set of 18 samples. Our model was validated and managed to predict the risk accuracy with R = 0.95 in accordance with the human auditor results.

Suggested Citation

  • Guy Burstein & Inon Zuckerman, 2023. "Deconstructing Risk Factors for Predicting Risk Assessment in Supply Chains Using Machine Learning," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:97-:d:1058851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/2/97/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/2/97/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mihalis Giannakis & Michalis Louis, 2016. "A Multi-Agent Based System with Big Data Processing for Enhanced Supply Chain Agility," Post-Print hal-01353916, HAL.
    2. Stephan M. Wagner & Christoph Bode, 2009. "Dominant Risks and Risk Management Practices in Supply Chains," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: George A. Zsidisin & Bob Ritchie (ed.), Supply Chain Risk, chapter 17, pages 271-290, Springer.
    3. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui & Boris Sokolov, 2019. "The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(3), pages 829-846, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asma Fekih, 2025. "A conceptual framework for integrating Robotic Process Automation in logistics audits and supply chain management [Un cadre conceptuel pour l'intégration de l'automatisation des processus robotisés dans les audits logistiques et la gestion de la c," Post-Print hal-05128257, HAL.
    2. Shawn McCarthy & Gita Alaghband, 2023. "The Emotion Magnitude Effect: Navigating Market Dynamics Amidst Supply Chain Events," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Mahmaod Alrawad & Abdalwali Lutfi & Mohammed Amin Almaiah & Adi Alsyouf & Hussin Mostafa Arafa & Yasser Soliman & Ibrahim A. Elshaer, 2023. "A Novel Framework of Public Risk Assessment Using an Integrated Approach Based on AHP and Psychometric Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Guy Burstein & Inon Zuckerman, 2025. "A Structured Causal Framework for Operational Risk Quantification: Bridging Subjective and Objective Uncertainty in Advanced Risk Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amine Belhadi & Venkatesh Mani & Sachin S. Kamble & Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Surabhi Verma, 2024. "Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: an empirical investigation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 333(2), pages 627-652, February.
    2. Chih-Hung Hsu & Xu He & Ting-Yi Zhang & An-Yuan Chang & Wan-Ling Liu & Zhi-Qiang Lin, 2022. "Enhancing Supply Chain Agility with Industry 4.0 Enablers to Mitigate Ripple Effects Based on Integrated QFD-MCDM: An Empirical Study of New Energy Materials Manufacturers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-35, May.
    3. Vaibhav S. Narwane & Rakesh D. Raut & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Manoj Dora & Balkrishna E. Narkhede, 2023. "Risks to Big Data Analytics and Blockchain Technology Adoption in Supply Chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 339-374, August.
    4. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Childe, Stephen J. & Bryde, David J. & Giannakis, Mihalis & Foropon, Cyril & Roubaud, David & Hazen, Benjamin T., 2020. "Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: A study of manufacturing organisations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Pournader, Mehrdokht & Ghaderi, Hadi & Hassanzadegan, Amir & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2021. "Artificial intelligence applications in supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    6. Mohammad Hamzehlou, 2024. "System dynamics model for an agile pharmaceutical supply chain during COVID‑19 pandemic in Iran," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-31, January.
    7. Guo, Hailan & Shen, Zhen & Chen, Yanting & Dong, Ming, 2025. "Analyzing the impact of government R&D subsidy and digital transformation on supply chain risk dynamics management and firm performance in the China's chip industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    8. Dominik Oehlschläger & Andreas H. Glas & Michael Eßig, 2024. "How Digital Twins Impact Responsiveness: A Dynamic Fit Approach to Information Processing for High-Involvement Product Demand Management," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 661-706, December.
    9. Amal Jishnu HM & Hareendrakumar VR & Suresh Subramoniam, 2025. "Digital Technology Adoption in Supply Chains: Uncovering the Research Collaborations and Trends by Bibliometric Analysis," Paradigm, , vol. 29(2), pages 161-182, December.
    10. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    11. Daniel A. Sanchez-Loor & Trang Thi Thuy Huynh & Wei-Shiun Chang, 2026. "Adaptive risk assessment: How massive disruption moderates risk propensity and organisational risk management strategies—lessons from COVID-19," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 1-35, May.
    12. Dmitry Ivanov, 2026. "Collaborative emergency adaptation for ripple effect mitigation in intertwined supply networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 359(2), pages 1727-1743, April.
    13. Prathmesh Vasant Pawar & Ratna Achuta Paluri, 2026. "Big Data Analytics in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: A Review of Literature," Vision, , vol. 30(2), pages 139-158, April.
    14. Samadhiya, Ashutosh & Yadav, Sanjeev & Kumar, Anil & Majumdar, Abhijit & Luthra, Sunil & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Upadhyay, Arvind, 2023. "The influence of artificial intelligence techniques on disruption management: Does supply chain dynamism matter?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    15. Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel & Arias-Fonseca, Sebastián & Ishizaka, Alessio & Barbati, Maria & Avendaño-Collante, Betty & Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and discrete-event simulation for capacity management of intensive care units during the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    16. Sachin Kumar Mangla & Yiğit Kazançoğlu & Abdullah Yıldızbaşı & Cihat Öztürk & Ahmet Çalık, 2022. "A conceptual framework for blockchain‐based sustainable supply chain and evaluating implementation barriers: A case of the tea supply chain," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(8), pages 3693-3716, December.
    17. Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre & Sokolov, Boris, 2022. "Cloud supply chain: Integrating Industry 4.0 and digital platforms in the “Supply Chain-as-a-Service”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Yuling Sun & Xiaomei Song & Yihao Jiang & Jian Guo, 2023. "Strategy Analysis of Fresh Agricultural Enterprises in a Competitive Circumstance: The Impact of Blockchain and Consumer Traceability Preferences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    20. Kirti Nayal & Rakesh D. Raut & Balkrishna E. Narkhede & Pragati Priyadarshinee & Gajanan B. Panchal & Vidyadhar V. Gedam, 2023. "Antecedents for blockchain technology-enabled sustainable agriculture supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 293-337, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:97-:d:1058851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.