IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v12y2019i4p183-d294111.html

Robust Bayesian Inference in Stochastic Frontier Models

Author

Listed:
  • Mike G. Tsionas

    (Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YX, UK)

Abstract

We use the concept of coarsened posteriors to provide robust Bayesian inference via coarsening in order to robustify posteriors arising from stochastic frontier models. These posteriors arise from tempered versions of the likelihood when at most a pre-specified amount of data is used, and are robust to changes in the model. Specifically, we examine robustness to changes in the distribution of the composed error in the stochastic frontier model (SFM). Moreover, coarsening is a form of regularization, reduces overfitting and makes inferences less sensitive to model choice. The new techniques are illustrated using artificial data as well as in a substantive application to large U.S. banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike G. Tsionas, 2019. "Robust Bayesian Inference in Stochastic Frontier Models," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:12:y:2019:i:4:p:183-:d:294111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/12/4/183/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/12/4/183/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guohua Feng & Chuan Wang & Xibin Zhang, 2019. "Estimation of inefficiency in stochastic frontier models: a Bayesian kernel approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Xu Guo & Gao-Rong Li & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2018. "Specification Testing of Production in a Stochastic Frontier Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-10, August.
    3. Jeffrey W. Miller & David B. Dunson, 2019. "Robust Bayesian Inference via Coarsening," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(527), pages 1113-1125, July.
    4. Fernandez, Carmen & Osiewalski, Jacek & Steel, Mark F. J., 1997. "On the use of panel data in stochastic frontier models with improper priors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 169-193, July.
    5. Emir Malikov & Subal C. Kumbhakar & Mike G. Tsionas, 2016. "A Cost System Approach to the Stochastic Directional Technology Distance Function with Undesirable Outputs: The Case of us Banks in 2001–2010," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(7), pages 1407-1429, November.
    6. Parmeter, Christopher F. & Kumbhakar, Subal C., 2014. "Efficiency Analysis: A Primer on Recent Advances," Foundations and Trends(R) in Econometrics, now publishers, vol. 7(3-4), pages 191-385, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deng, Yaguo & Wiper, Michael Peter & Lopes Moreira da Veiga, María Helena, 2024. "A Bayesian semi-parametric approach to stochastic frontier models with inefficiency heterogeneity," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 43837, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orea, Luis, 2019. "The Econometric Measurement of Firms’ Efficiency," Efficiency Series Papers 2019/02, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    2. Christopher F. Parmeter & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2019. "Combining the Virtues of Stochastic Frontier and Data Envelopment Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1628-1658, November.
    3. Tsionas, Mike G., 2021. "Optimal combinations of stochastic frontier and data envelopment analysis models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 790-800.
    4. Guohua Feng & Chuan Wang, 2021. "Determinants of profitability of community banks in the USA: a cost-frontier-based decomposition approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 2969-2992, June.
    5. Tsionas, Mike G., 2023. "Joint production in stochastic non-parametric envelopment of data with firm-specific directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1336-1347.
    6. Guohua Feng & Chuan Wang & Xibin Zhang, 2019. "Estimation of inefficiency in stochastic frontier models: a Bayesian kernel approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Tsionas, Mike & Parmeter, Christopher F. & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2023. "Bayesian Artificial Neural Networks for frontier efficiency analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 236(2).
    8. Tsionas, Mike G., 2020. "Bounded rationality and thick frontiers in stochastic frontier analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 762-768.
    9. Hong Ngoc Nguyen & Christopher O’Donnell, 2025. "Using stochastic frontier analysis to assess the performance of public service providers in the presence of demand uncertainty," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 61-79, August.
    10. Koop, Gary & Poirier, Dale J., 2004. "Bayesian variants of some classical semiparametric regression techniques," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 259-282, December.
    11. Christopher F. Parmeter & Hung-Jen Wang & Subal C. Kumbhakar, 2017. "Nonparametric estimation of the determinants of inefficiency," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 205-221, June.
    12. Tsionas, Mike G., 2020. "Quantile Stochastic Frontiers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 1177-1184.
    13. Efthymios G. Tsionas, 2006. "Inference in dynamic stochastic frontier models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(5), pages 669-676, July.
    14. Peterson K. Ozili, 2017. "Bank Profitability and Capital Regulation: Evidence from Listed and non-Listed Banks in Africa," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 143-168, April.
    15. Václava Pánková, 2019. "Are efficient firms motivated to invest? Evidence of manufacture of motor vehicles in Czech Republic," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 29(3), pages 67-76.
    16. Tsionas, Mike G. & Izzeldin, Marwan, 2018. "Smooth approximations to monotone concave functions in production analysis: An alternative to nonparametric concave least squares," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 797-807.
    17. Glass, Anthony J. & Kenjegalieva, Karligash & Sickles, Robin C. & Weyman-Jones, Thomas, 2018. "The Spatial Efficiency Multiplier and Common Correlated Effects in a Spatial Autoregressive Stochastic Frontier Model," Working Papers 18-003, Rice University, Department of Economics.
    18. Phill Wheat & Alexander D. Stead & William H. Greene, 2019. "Robust stochastic frontier analysis: a Student’s t-half normal model with application to highway maintenance costs in England," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 21-38, February.
    19. Mike Tsionas & Marwan Izzeldin & Arne Henningsen & Evaggelos Paravalos, 2022. "Addressing endogeneity when estimating stochastic ray production frontiers: a Bayesian approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1345-1363, March.
    20. Tsionas, Mike G., 2021. "Comparison of stochastic frontier models using the Hyvärinen factor," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:12:y:2019:i:4:p:183-:d:294111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.