IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i1p45-d1608737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profitability, Efficiency, and Market Structure in the Meat and Milk Processing Industry: Evidence from Central Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Zdeňka Žáková Kroupová

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Gabriela Trnková

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Králové, 500 02 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of the market structure and efficiency on firm performance in the meat and milk processing industry in Poland, Czechia, and Slovakia. Using stochastic frontier analysis and a profitability regression model applied to data from 2015 to 2021, the results indicate no evidence of collusive behavior in the examined markets. Instead, profitability is significantly driven by efficiency, supporting the hypothesis of an efficient market structure. Companies with higher market shares do not exploit their market power to set higher prices and increase profitability. The findings highlight efficiency as a critical determinant of performance in unconcentrated markets, offering valuable insights for stakeholders in the food processing industry and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Zdeňka Žáková Kroupová & Gabriela Trnková, 2025. "Profitability, Efficiency, and Market Structure in the Meat and Milk Processing Industry: Evidence from Central Europe," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-30, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:45-:d:1608737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/1/45/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/1/45/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cliff Huang & Tai-Hsin Huang & Nan-Hung Liu, 2014. "A new approach to estimating the metafrontier production function based on a stochastic frontier framework," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 241-254, December.
    2. Chad Syverson, 2019. "Macroeconomics and Market Power: Context, Implications, and Open Questions," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(3), pages 23-43, Summer.
    3. George Battese & D. Rao & Christopher O'Donnell, 2004. "A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 91-103, January.
    4. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Adjei Dwumfour & Eric Fosu Oteng-Abayie & Emmanuel Kwasi Mensah, 2022. "Bank efficiency and the bank lending channel: new evidence," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1489-1542, September.
    2. Ensar Yılmaz & Zeynep Kaplan, 2022. "Heterogeneity of market power: firm-level evidence," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 1207-1228, May.
    3. Nathan D. DeLay & Nathanael M. Thompson & James R. Mintert, 2022. "Precision agriculture technology adoption and technical efficiency," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 195-219, February.
    4. Li, Biao & Xie, Bai-Chen & Yu, Xiao-Chen & She, Zhen-Yu & Hu, Wenhao, 2025. "Does the incentive policy for renewable energy grid connection affect the technical efficiency of power grid companies? Empirical analysis based on China and Japan," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 28-47.
    5. Thanh Pham Thien Nguyen & Son Hong Nghiem & Eduardo Roca & Parmendra Sharma, 2016. "Efficiency, innovation and competition: evidence from Vietnam, China and India," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1235-1259, November.
    6. Adwitiya Gupta & Rashmi Shukla & Rudra Sensarma, 2025. "Ownership structure and bank efficiency in India: new evidence from a meta-frontier approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1713-1737, April.
    7. Zhang, Hui & Zhou, Peng & Sun, Xiumei & Ni, Guanqun, 2024. "Disparities in energy efficiency and its determinants in Chinese cities: From the perspective of heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    8. Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Higgins, Daniel & Arslan, Aslihan, 2020. "Irrigation infrastructure and farm productivity in the Philippines: A stochastic Meta-Frontier analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Lars Christian Bruno & Riana Steen, 2022. "Norwegian oil market concentration and its effects on the oil service companies 1993–2013," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 69(2), pages 242-262, May.
    10. Lee, Chi-Chuan & Huang, Tai-Hsin, 2017. "Cost efficiency and technological gap in Western European banks: A stochastic metafrontier analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 161-178.
    11. Lan, Jing & Wang, Pei, 2025. "An efficiency perspective on low carbon pilot city policy and carbon emission performance of listed enterprises: Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Phuc Trong Ho & Pham Xuan Hung & Nguyen Duc Tien, 2023. "Effects of varieties and seasons on cost efficiency in rice farming: A stochastic metafrontier approach," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 13(2), pages 120-129.
    13. Nguyen, Hoa-Thi-Minh & Do, Huong & Kompas, Tom, 2021. "Economic efficiency versus social equity: The productivity challenge for rice production in a ‘greying’ rural Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. Cristian Barra & Raffaele Lagravinese & Roberto Zotti, 2022. "Exploring hospital efficiency within and between Italian regions: new empirical evidence," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 269-284, June.
    15. Perfetti Juan José & José Leibovich, & Martha Delgado & Enrique López, 2024. "La tierra para uso agropecuario en Colombia: equidad y productividad," Cuadernos de Fedesarrollo 21192, Fedesarrollo.
    16. Huang, Tai-Hsin & Hu, Chu-Nan & Chang, Bao-Guang, 2018. "Competition, efficiency, and innovation in Taiwan’s banking industry — An application of copula methods," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 362-375.
    17. Juan José Perfetti & José Leibovich, & Martha Delgado & Enrique López, 2024. "La tierra para uso agropecuario en Colombia: equidad y productividad," Informes de Investigación 21032, Fedesarrollo.
    18. Dogba, Kollie B. & Kosura, Willis Oluoch & Chumo, Chepchumba, 2021. "Stochastic meta-frontier function analysis of the regional efficiency and technology gap ratios (TGRs) of small-scale cassava producers in Liberia," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 16(01), March.
    19. Wirat Krasachat, 2023. "The Effect of Good Agricultural Practices on the Technical Efficiency of Chili Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    20. Qian Liu & Yongmu Jiang & Carl‐Johan Lagerkvist & Wei Huang, 2023. "Extension services and the technical efficiency of crop‐specific farms in China," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 436-459, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:45-:d:1608737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.