IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i5p708-d1646670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does WASH FIT Improve Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene and Related Health Impacts in Healthcare Facilities? A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Lineberger

    (The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4114 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA)

  • Ryan Cronk

    (The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4114 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA)

  • Sena Kpodzro

    (The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4114 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA)

  • Aaron Salzberg

    (The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4114 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA)

  • Darcy M. Anderson

    (The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4114 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA)

Abstract

Environmental health services in healthcare facilities are important, but coverage gaps remain. The World Health Organization and UNICEF developed the Water and Sanitation for Health Facility Improvement Tool (WASH FIT) to assess and improve environmental health services in healthcare facilities. Over 70 countries have adopted it. However, there is little evidence of its effectiveness. This systematic review evaluates whether WASH FIT improves environmental health services and associated health outcomes and impacts. We extracted data from 31 studies on inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impacts associated with WASH FIT and summarized findings using a logic model framework. Twenty-three studies reported quantitative outputs for environmental health services. Of these, only nine reported longitudinal changes in these outputs throughout WASH FIT implementation. Six studies reported quantitative outcomes; the remainder described outcomes qualitatively or not at all. No studies directly measured impacts or evaluated WASH FIT against a rigorous control group. We found that available evidence was insufficient to evaluate WASH FIT’s effectiveness. Further effort is needed to identify the inputs and activities required to implement WASH FIT and to draw specific links between changes in outputs, outcomes, and impacts. Opportunities exist to improve evidence by more comprehensively reporting WASH FIT assessments and exploiting data on health impacts within health management information systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Lineberger & Ryan Cronk & Sena Kpodzro & Aaron Salzberg & Darcy M. Anderson, 2025. "Does WASH FIT Improve Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene and Related Health Impacts in Healthcare Facilities? A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(5), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:708-:d:1646670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/5/708/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/5/708/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Udhayashankar Kanagasabai & Kayla Enriquez & Richard Gelting & Paul Malpiedi & Celina Zayzay & James Kendor & Shirley Fahnbulleh & Catherine Cooper & Williamatta Gibson & Rose Brown & Nadoris Nador & , 2021. "The Impact of Water Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) Improvements on Hand Hygiene at Two Liberian Hospitals during the Recovery Phase of an Ebola Epidemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-13, March.
    2. repec:plo:pmed00:0040296 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    4. Mitsuaki Hirai & Victor Nyamandi & Charles Siachema & Nesbert Shirihuru & Lovemore Dhoba & Alison Baggen & Trevor Kanyowa & John Mwenda & Lilian Dodzo & Portia Manangazira & Musiwarwo Chirume & Marc O, 2021. "Using the Water and Sanitation for Health Facility Improvement Tool (WASH FIT) in Zimbabwe: A Cross-Sectional Study of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Services in 50 COVID-19 Isolation Facilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-11, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    2. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Elizabeth T Cafiero-Fonseca & Andrew Stawasz & Sydney T Johnson & Reiko Sato & David E Bloom, 2017. "The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Santos Urbina & Sofía Villatoro & Jesús Salinas, 2021. "Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, June.
    5. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.
    6. Nadine Desrochers & Adèle Paul‐Hus & Jen Pecoskie, 2017. "Five decades of gratitude: A meta‐synthesis of acknowledgments research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2821-2833, December.
    7. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    8. Alene Sze Jing Yong & Yi Heng Lim & Mark Wing Loong Cheong & Ednin Hamzah & Siew Li Teoh, 2022. "Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(6), pages 1037-1057, August.
    9. Xue-Ying Xu & Hong Kong & Rui-Xiang Song & Yu-Han Zhai & Xiao-Fei Wu & Wen-Si Ai & Hong-Bo Liu, 2014. "The Effectiveness of Noninvasive Biomarkers to Predict Hepatitis B-Related Significant Fibrosis and Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Vicente Miñana-Signes & Manuel Monfort-Pañego & Javier Valiente, 2021. "Teaching Back Health in the School Setting: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    12. Obsa Urgessa Ayana & Jima Degaga, 2022. "Effects of rural electrification on household welfare: a meta-regression analysis," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 69(2), pages 209-261, June.
    13. Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Rizzoli, Valentina & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    14. García-Poole, Chloe & Byrne, Sonia & Rodrigo, María José, 2019. "How do communities intervene with adolescents at psychosocial risk? A systematic review of positive development programs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 194-209.
    15. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    16. Qing Ye & Bao-Xin Qian & Wei-Li Yin & Feng-Mei Wang & Tao Han, 2016. "Association between the HFE C282Y, H63D Polymorphisms and the Risks of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis o," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Bishal Mohindru & David Turner & Tracey Sach & Diana Bilton & Siobhan Carr & Olga Archangelidi & Arjun Bhadhuri & Jennifer A. Whitty, 2020. "Health State Utility Data in Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 13-25, March.
    18. Subramaniam, Mega & Pang, Natalie & Morehouse, Shandra & Asgarali-Hoffman, S. Nisa, 2020. "Examining vulnerability in youth digital information practices scholarship: What are we missing or exhausting?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    19. Neal R. Haddaway & Matthew J. Page & Chris C. Pritchard & Luke A. McGuinness, 2022. "PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    20. Ding Zhu & Mindan Wu & Yuan Cao & Shihua Lin & Nanxia Xuan & Chen Zhu & Wen Li & Huahao Shen, 2018. "Heated humidification did not improve compliance of positive airway pressure and subjective daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:708-:d:1646670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.