IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i6p693-d1403902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models of Governance of Disability Therapy Support Workers in Rural and Remote Settings: A Systematic Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Moran

    (Department of Rural Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Shepparton, VIC 3630, Australia)

  • Kim Bulkeley

    (Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Genevieve Johnsson

    (Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Elaine Tam

    (Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Catherine Maloney

    (Services for Australian Rural and Remote Allied Health, Barton, ACT 2600, Australia)

Abstract

The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) ushered in a transformative era in disability services in Australia, requiring new workforce models to meet evolving participant needs. Therapy Assistants are utilised to increase the capacity of therapy services in areas of workforce shortage. The governance arrangements required to support this emergent workforce have received limited attention in the literature. This review examined the key components and contextual factors of governance in rural settings, specifically focusing on therapy support workers under the guidance of allied health professionals in rural and remote areas. Guided by the social model of disability and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, a realist perspective was used to analyse 26 papers (after deduplication), mostly Australian and qualitative, with an emphasis on staff capabilities, training, and credentialling. Success measures were often vaguely defined, with most papers focusing on staff improvement and few focusing on client or organisational improvement. Consistent staffing, role clarity, community collaboration, and supportive leadership were identified as enabling contexts for successful governance of disability therapy support workers in rural areas. Investment in capability (soft skills) development, tailored training, competency assessment, credentialling, and supervision were identified as key activities that, when coupled with the identified enabling contexts, were likely to influence staff, client and organisational outcomes. Further research is warranted to explore long-term impacts of governance arrangements, educational program accountability, and activities targeted at enhancing staff capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Moran & Kim Bulkeley & Genevieve Johnsson & Elaine Tam & Catherine Maloney, 2024. "Models of Governance of Disability Therapy Support Workers in Rural and Remote Settings: A Systematic Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:6:p:693-:d:1403902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/6/693/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/6/693/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:6:p:693-:d:1403902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.