IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p4984-d1094829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harnessing Machine Learning in Tackling Domestic Violence—An Integrative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Vivian Hui

    (Center for Smart Health, School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)

  • Rose E. Constantino

    (Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA)

  • Young Ji Lee

    (Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
    Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA)

Abstract

Domestic violence (DV) is a public health crisis that threatens both the mental and physical health of people. With the unprecedented surge in data available on the internet and electronic health record systems, leveraging machine learning (ML) to detect obscure changes and predict the likelihood of DV from digital text data is a promising area health science research. However, there is a paucity of research discussing and reviewing ML applications in DV research. Methods: We extracted 3588 articles from four databases. Twenty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Results: Twelve articles used the supervised ML method, seven articles used the unsupervised ML method, and three articles applied both. Most studies were published in Australia ( n = 6) and the United States ( n = 4). Data sources included social media, professional notes, national databases, surveys, and newspapers. Random forest ( n = 9), support vector machine ( n = 8), and naïve Bayes ( n = 7) were the top three algorithms, while the most used automatic algorithm for unsupervised ML in DV research was latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) for topic modeling ( n = 2). Eight types of outcomes were identified, while three purposes of ML and challenges were delineated and are discussed. Conclusions: Leveraging the ML method to tackle DV holds unprecedented potential, especially in classification, prediction, and exploration tasks, and particularly when using social media data. However, adoption challenges, data source issues, and lengthy data preparation times are the main bottlenecks in this context. To overcome those challenges, early ML algorithms have been developed and evaluated on DV clinical data.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivian Hui & Rose E. Constantino & Young Ji Lee, 2023. "Harnessing Machine Learning in Tackling Domestic Violence—An Integrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4984-:d:1094829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4984/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4984/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard A. Berk & Susan B. Sorenson & Geoffrey Barnes, 2016. "Forecasting Domestic Violence: A Machine Learning Approach to Help Inform Arraignment Decisions," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 94-115, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jens Ludwig & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2021. "Fragile Algorithms and Fallible Decision-Makers: Lessons from the Justice System," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 35(4), pages 71-96, Fall.
    2. Jeffrey Grogger & Sean Gupta & Ria Ivandic & Tom Kirchmaier, 2021. "Comparing Conventional and Machine‐Learning Approaches to Risk Assessment in Domestic Abuse Cases," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 90-130, March.
    3. Xiaochen Hu & Xudong Zhang & Nicholas Lovrich, 2021. "Public perceptions of police behavior during traffic stops: logistic regression and machine learning approaches compared," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 355-380, May.
    4. Stevenson, Megan T. & Doleac, Jennifer, 2019. "Algorithmic Risk Assessment in the Hands of Humans," IZA Discussion Papers 12853, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Richard Berk, 2019. "Accuracy and Fairness for Juvenile Justice Risk Assessments," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 175-194, March.
    6. Eli Ben-Michael & D. James Greiner & Melody Huang & Kosuke Imai & Zhichao Jiang & Sooahn Shin, 2024. "Does AI help humans make better decisions? A methodological framework for experimental evaluation," Papers 2403.12108, arXiv.org.
    7. Netta Barak‐Corren & Yoav Kan‐Tor & Nelson Tebbe, 2022. "Examining the effects of antidiscrimination laws on children in the foster care and adoption systems," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 1003-1066, December.
    8. Cristopher Moore & Elise Ferguson & Paul Guerin, 2023. "How accurate are rebuttable presumptions of pretrial dangerousness?: A natural experiment from New Mexico," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 377-408, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4984-:d:1094829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.