IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p1687-d1038647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Slurry Reflux in a Corn Stalk Continuous Anaerobic Digestion System: Performance and Microbial Community

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Zhao

    (College of Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Yang Gao

    (College of Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Jiaxing Sun

    (College of Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Yanan Wang

    (College of Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Congxin Wang

    (College of Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Shuai Yu

    (College of Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Zhen Wang

    (College of Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Jingyang Li

    (College of Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Ronghou Liu

    (Biomass Energy Engineering Research Centre, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Wei Kou

    (Department of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Yingkou Institute of Technology, Yingkou 115014, China)

Abstract

Slurry reflux is a low-cost slurry reduction technology, which can solve the problem that a large amount of slurry cannot be completely consumed in a biogas plant. Anaerobic digestion (AD) of corn stalks with slurry reflux and non-reflux was compared and evaluated in continuous anaerobic digestion to clarify the effects of slurry reflux on AD with organic loading rate (OLR) variation. It was found that slurry reflux increased cumulative methane production and improved system stability. The average methane yield of the slurry reflux group was 224.19 mL/gVS, which was 41.35% higher than that of the non-reflux group. High-throughput sequencing results showed that slurry reflux increased the microbial community richness. The dominant microorganisms in the reflux group were in phylum Bacteroidetes, which have the capacity to degrade polymers, and Methanothrix , which is an aceticlastic methanogen. The relative abundances of Bacteroidetes and Methanothrix were 32.41% and 41.75%, respectively. Clostridium III and Saccharofermentans , which are related to syntrophic acetate oxidation and hydrolysis, were increased in relative abundance in the slurry reflux system. The increase of the OLR altered the main methane-producing pathway from the acetoclastic methanogenic pathway to the hydrogenotrophic methanogenic pathway in the AD system, and the slurry reflux can delay this trend. This study provided an effective way for the reduction and utilization of slurry in a biogas plant.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Zhao & Yang Gao & Jiaxing Sun & Yanan Wang & Congxin Wang & Shuai Yu & Zhen Wang & Jingyang Li & Ronghou Liu & Wei Kou, 2023. "The Role of Slurry Reflux in a Corn Stalk Continuous Anaerobic Digestion System: Performance and Microbial Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1687-:d:1038647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1687/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1687/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gottardo, Marco & Micolucci, Federico & Bolzonella, David & Uellendahl, Hinrich & Pavan, Paolo, 2017. "Pilot scale fermentation coupled with anaerobic digestion of food waste - Effect of dynamic digestate recirculation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 455-463.
    2. Gulhane, Madhuri & Pandit, Prabhakar & Khardenavis, Anshuman & Singh, Dharmesh & Purohit, Hemant, 2017. "Study of microbial community plasticity for anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste in Anaerobic Baffled Reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 59-66.
    3. Yu, Qiong & Liu, Ronghou & Li, Kun & Ma, Ruijie, 2019. "A review of crop straw pretreatment methods for biogas production by anaerobic digestion in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 51-58.
    4. Li, YuQian & Liu, ChunMei & Wachemo, Akiber Chufo & Li, XiuJin, 2018. "Effects of liquid fraction of digestate recirculation on system performance and microbial community structure during serial anaerobic digestion of completely stirred tank reactors for corn stover," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 309-317.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian, Wenjing & Li, Jianhao & Zhu, Lirong & Li, Wen & He, Linyan & Gu, Li & Deng, Rui & Shi, Dezhi & Chai, Hongxiang & Gao, Meng, 2021. "Insights of enhancing methane production under high-solid anaerobic digestion of wheat straw by calcium peroxide pretreatment and zero valent iron addition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1321-1332.
    2. Siswo Sumardiono & Bakti Jos & Agata Advensia Eksa Dewanti & Isa Mahendra & Heri Cahyono, 2021. "Biogas Production from Coffee Pulp and Chicken Feathers Using Liquid- and Solid-State Anaerobic Digestions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Karami, Kavosh & Karimi, Keikhosro & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Kumar, Rajeev, 2022. "Mesophilic aerobic digestion: An efficient and inexpensive biological pretreatment to improve biogas production from highly-recalcitrant pinewood," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    4. Zhang, Huaiwen & Yao, Yiqing & Deng, Jun & Zhang, Jian-Li & Qiu, Yaojing & Li, Guofu & Liu, Jian, 2022. "Hydrogen production via anaerobic digestion of coal modified by white-rot fungi and its application benefits analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    6. Safieddin Ardebili, Seyed Mohammad, 2020. "Green electricity generation potential from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of farm animal waste and agriculture residues in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 29-37.
    7. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    8. Algapani, Dalal E. & Qiao, Wei & Ricci, Marina & Bianchi, Davide & M. Wandera, Simon & Adani, Fabrizio & Dong, Renjie, 2019. "Bio-hydrogen and bio-methane production from food waste in a two-stage anaerobic digestion process with digestate recirculation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1108-1115.
    9. Sun, Hui & Wang, Enzhen & Li, Xiang & Cui, Xian & Guo, Jianbin & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "Potential biomethane production from crop residues in China: Contributions to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Li, YuQian & Liu, ChunMei & Wachemo, Akiber Chufo & Li, XiuJin, 2018. "Effects of liquid fraction of digestate recirculation on system performance and microbial community structure during serial anaerobic digestion of completely stirred tank reactors for corn stover," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 309-317.
    11. Theresa Menzel & Peter Neubauer & Stefan Junne, 2020. "Role of Microbial Hydrolysis in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, October.
    12. Stolecka, Katarzyna & Rusin, Andrzej, 2021. "Potential hazards posed by biogas plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    13. Yang, Min & Watson, Jamison & Wang, Zixin & Si, Buchun & Jiang, Weizhong & Zhou, Bo & Zhang, Yuanhui, 2022. "Understanding and design of two-stage fermentation: A perspective of interspecies electron transfer," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. do Carmo Precci Lopes, Alice & Mudadu Silva, Cláudio & Pereira Rosa, André & de Ávila Rodrigues, Fábio, 2018. "Biogas production from thermophilic anaerobic digestion of kraft pulp mill sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 40-49.
    15. Xiao He & Lianjun Wang & Anthony Lau, 2020. "Investigation of Steam Treatment on the Sorption Behavior of Rice Straw Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-9, October.
    16. Kan, Tao & Strezov, Vladimir & Evans, Tim & He, Jing & Kumar, Ravinder & Lu, Qiang, 2020. "Catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: A review of variations in process factors and system structure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Nsanzumukiza Martin Vincent & Yuansong Wei & Junya Zhang & Dawei Yu & Juan Tong, 2018. "Characterization and Dynamic Shift of Microbial Communities during Start-Up, Overloading and Steady-State in an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Stephen Tangwe & Patrick Mukumba & Golden Makaka, 2022. "Design and Employing of a Non-Linear Response Surface Model to Predict the Microbial Loads in Anaerobic Digestion of Cow Manure: Batch Balloon Digester," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Qin, Yu & Wu, Jing & Xiao, Benyi & Cong, Ming & Hojo, Toshimasa & Cheng, Jun & Li, Yu-You, 2019. "Strategy of adjusting recirculation ratio for biohythane production via recirculated temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of food waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1235-1245.
    20. Shen, Feng & Xiong, Xinni & Fu, Junyan & Yang, Jirui & Qiu, Mo & Qi, Xinhua & Tsang, Daniel C.W., 2020. "Recent advances in mechanochemical production of chemicals and carbon materials from sustainable biomass resources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1687-:d:1038647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.