IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i12p6088-d1167232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

German GPs’ Self-Perceived Role in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Leadership, Participation in Regional Services and Preferences for Future Pandemic Preparedness

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Kugai

    (Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany)

  • Dorothea Wild

    (Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany)

  • Yelda Krumpholtz

    (Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany)

  • Manuela Schmidt

    (Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany)

  • Katrin Balzer

    (Nursing Research Unit, Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Luebeck, Germany)

  • Astrid Mayerböck

    (uzbonn, Survey Center Bonn—Center for Empirical Social Research and Evaluation, Oxfordstraße 15, 53111 Bonn, Germany)

  • Birgitta Weltermann

    (Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany)

Abstract

General practitioners (GPs) played a vital role during the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about GPs’ view of their role, leadership, participation in regional services and preferences for future pandemic preparedness. This representative study of German GPs comprised a web-based survey and computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI). It addressed GPs’ satisfaction with their role, self-perceived leadership (validated C-LEAD scale), participation in newly established health services, and preferences for future pandemic preparedness (net promotor score; NPS; range −100 to +100%). Statistical analyses were conducted using Spearman’s correlation and Kruskal–Wallis tests. In total, 630 GPs completed the questionnaire and 102 GPs the CATI. In addition to their practice duties, most GPs (72.5%) participated in at least one regional health service, mainly vaccination centres/teams (52.7%). Self-perceived leadership was high with a C-LEAD score of 47.4 (max. 63; SD ± 8.5). Overall, 58.8% were not satisfied with their role which correlated with the feeling of being left alone (r = −0.349, p < 0.001). 77.5 % of respondents believed that political leaders underestimated GPs’ potential contribution to pandemic control. Regarding regional pandemic services, GPs preferred COVID-19 focus practices (NPS +43.7) over diagnostic centres (NPS −31). Many GPs, though highly engaged regionally, were dissatisfied with their role but had clear preferences for future regional services. Future pandemic planning should integrate GPs’ perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Kugai & Dorothea Wild & Yelda Krumpholtz & Manuela Schmidt & Katrin Balzer & Astrid Mayerböck & Birgitta Weltermann, 2023. "German GPs’ Self-Perceived Role in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Leadership, Participation in Regional Services and Preferences for Future Pandemic Preparedness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:12:p:6088-:d:1167232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/12/6088/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/12/6088/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhou, Qin & Sacramento, Claudia & Martinaityte, Ieva, 2023. "Work meaningfulness and performance among healthcare professionals: The role of professional respect and participative management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Constance Noonan Hadley & Todd L. Pittinsky & Amy S. Sommer & Weichun Zhu, 2011. "Measuring the efficacy of leaders to assess information and make decisions in a crisis: The C-LEAD scale," Post-Print hal-00629566, HAL.
    3. Claire Collins & Els Clays & Esther Van Poel & Joanna Cholewa & Katica Tripkovic & Katarzyna Nessler & Ségolène de Rouffignac & Milena Šantrić Milićević & Zoran Bukumiric & Limor Adler & Cécile Ponsar, 2022. "Distress and Wellbeing among General Practitioners in 33 Countries during COVID-19: Results from the Cross-Sectional PRICOV-19 Study to Inform Health System Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannah, Sean T. & Avolio, Bruce J. & Walumbwa, Fred O. & Chan, Adrian, 2012. "Leader Self and Means Efficacy: A multi-component approach," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 143-161.
    2. Elizaveta Fomenko & Ines Keygnaert & Esther Van Poel & Claire Collins & Raquel Gómez Bravo & Päivi Korhonen & Merja K. Laine & Liubove Murauskiene & Athina Tatsioni & Sara Willems, 2023. "Screening for and Disclosure of Domestic Violence during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of the PRICOV-19 Cross-Sectional Study in 33 Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Peter Groenewegen & Esther Van Poel & Peter Spreeuwenberg & Ronald Batenburg & Christian Mallen & Liubove Murauskiene & Antoni Peris & Benoit Pétré & Emmily Schaubroeck & Stefanie Stark & Emil L. Sigu, 2022. "Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Led to Changes in the Tasks of the Primary Care Workforce? An International Survey among General Practices in 38 Countries (PRICOV-19)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Prigge, Jana-Kristin & Dietz, Beatrix & Homburg, Christian & Hoyer, Wayne D. & Burton, Jennifer L., 2015. "Patient empowerment: A cross-disease exploration of antecedents and consequences," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 375-386.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:12:p:6088-:d:1167232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.