IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5161-d800888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of Household Coal Combustion on Indoor Ultrafine Particles—A Preliminary Case Study and Implication on Exposure Reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Zhihan Luo

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Ran Xing

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Wenxuan Huang

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Rui Xiong

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Lifan Qin

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Yuxuan Ren

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Yaojie Li

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Xinlei Liu

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Yatai Men

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Ke Jiang

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Yanlin Tian

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control (AEMPC), Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Guofeng Shen

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

Abstract

Ultrafine particles (UFPs) significantly affect human health and climate. UFPs can be produced largely from the incomplete burning of solid fuels in stoves; however, indoor UFPs are less studied compared to outdoor UFPs, especially in coal-combustion homes. In this study, indoor and outdoor UFP concentrations were measured simultaneously by using a portable instrument, and internal and outdoor source contributions to indoor UFPs were estimated using a statistical approach based on highly temporally resolved data. The total concentrations of indoor UFPs in a rural household with the presence of coal burning were as high as 1.64 × 10 5 (1.32 × 10 5 –2.09 × 10 5 as interquartile range) #/cm 3 , which was nearly one order of magnitude higher than that of outdoor UFPs. Indoor UFPs were unimodal, with the greatest abundance of particles in the size range of 31.6–100 nm. The indoor-to-outdoor ratio of UFPs in a rural household was about 6.4 (2.7–16.0), while it was 0.89 (0.88–0.91) in a home without strong internal sources. A dynamic process illustrated that the particle number concentration increased by ~5 times during the coal ignition period. Indoor coal combustion made up to over 80% of indoor UFPs, while in an urban home without coal combustion sources indoors, the outdoor sources may contribute to nearly 90% of indoor UFPs. A high number concentration and a greater number of finer particles in homes with the presence of coal combustion indicated serious health hazards associated with UFP exposure and the necessity for future controls on indoor UFPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhihan Luo & Ran Xing & Wenxuan Huang & Rui Xiong & Lifan Qin & Yuxuan Ren & Yaojie Li & Xinlei Liu & Yatai Men & Ke Jiang & Yanlin Tian & Guofeng Shen, 2022. "Impacts of Household Coal Combustion on Indoor Ultrafine Particles—A Preliminary Case Study and Implication on Exposure Reduction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5161-:d:800888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duan, Xiaoli & Jiang, Yong & Wang, Beibei & Zhao, Xiuge & Shen, Guofeng & Cao, Suzhen & Huang, Nan & Qian, Yan & Chen, Yiting & Wang, Limin, 2014. "Household fuel use for cooking and heating in China: Results from the first Chinese Environmental Exposure-Related Human Activity Patterns Survey (CEERHAPS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 692-703.
    2. Fabio Boccuni & Riccardo Ferrante & Francesca Tombolini & Sergio Iavicoli & Armando Pelliccioni, 2021. "Relationship between Indoor High Frequency Size Distribution of Ultrafine Particles and Their Metrics in a University Site," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Du & Long Chen & Yuanchen Chen, 2022. "Solid Fuel Combustion and Air Pollution: Filling the Data Gap and Future Priorities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-3, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Hefti & Peiyao Shen & King King Li, 2021. "Igniting deliberation in high stake decisions: a field study," ECON - Working Papers 378, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    2. Li, Meng & Jin, Tianyu & Liu, Shenglong & Zhou, Shaojie, 2021. "The cost of clean energy transition in rural China: Evidence based on marginal treatment effects," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Muxing Xie & Chunrong Jia & Yawei Zhang & Beibei Wang & Ning Qin & Suzhen Cao & Liyun Zhao & Dongmei Yu & Xiaoli Duan, 2020. "Household Exposure to Secondhand Smoke among Chinese Children: Status, Determinants, and Co-Exposures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Meng, Xiaoxiao & Sun, Rui & Ismail, Tamer M. & Zhou, Wei & Ren, Xiaohan & Zhang, Ruihan, 2018. "Parametric studies on corn straw combustion characteristics in a fixed bed: Ash and moisture content," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 192-203.
    5. Alexandra L. Bellows & Donna Spiegelman & Shufa Du & Lindsay M. Jaacks, 2020. "The Association of Cooking Fuel Use, Dietary Intake, and Blood Pressure among Rural Women in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Fu Wang & Hong Geng & Donglan Zha & Chaoqun Zhang, 2023. "Multidimensional Energy Poverty in China: Measurement and Spatio-Temporal Disparities Characteristics," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 45-78, August.
    7. Yang, Siyuan & Chen, Bin & Wakeel, Muhammad & Hayat, Tasawar & Alsaedi, Ahmed & Ahmad, Bashir, 2018. "PM2.5 footprint of household energy consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 375-383.
    8. Alessandro Di Menno di Bucchianico & Mariacarmela Cusano & Raffaela Gaddi & Alessandra Gaeta & Gianluca Leone & Fabio Boccuni & Riccardo Ferrante & Armando Pelliccioni & Giorgio Cattani, 2021. "Indoor and Outdoor Particle Number Concentration in the Sapienza University Campus of Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Teng Ma & Silu Zhang & Yilong Xiao & Xiaorui Liu & Minghao Wang & Kai Wu & Guofeng Shen & Chen Huang & Yan Ru Fang & Yang Xie, 2023. "Costs and health benefits of the rural energy transition to carbon neutrality in China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Wang, Shaobin & Liu, Yonglin & Zhao, Chao & Pu, Haixia, 2019. "Residential energy consumption and its linkages with life expectancy in mainland China: A geographically weighted regression approach and energy-ladder-based perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 347-357.
    11. Peng, Wei & Yang, Junnan & Lu, Xi & Mauzerall, Denise L., 2018. "Potential co-benefits of electrification for air quality, health, and CO2 mitigation in 2030 China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 511-519.
    12. Liu, Hongxun & Mauzerall, Denise L., 2020. "Costs of clean heating in China: Evidence from rural households in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Xiaoyang Hou & Shuai Zhong & Jian’an Zhao, 2022. "A Critical Review on Decarbonizing Heating in China: Pathway Exploration for Technology with Multi-Sector Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Peng Nie & Alfonso Sousa-Poza & Jianhong Xue, 2016. "Fuel for Life: Domestic Cooking Fuels and Women’s Health in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    15. Shen, Guofeng & Lin, Weiwei & Chen, Yuanchen & Yue, Dingli & Liu, Zuoli & Yang, Chunli, 2015. "Factors influencing the adoption and sustainable use of clean fuels and cookstoves in China -a Chinese literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 741-750.
    16. Chen, Yilin & Shen, Huizhong & Zhong, Qirui & Chen, Han & Huang, Tianbo & Liu, Junfeng & Cheng, Hefa & Zeng, Eddy Y. & Smith, Kirk R. & Tao, Shu, 2016. "Transition of household cookfuels in China from 2010 to 2012," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 800-809.
    17. Peng, Liqun & Zhang, Qiang & Yao, Zhiliang & Mauzerall, Denise L. & Kang, Sicong & Du, Zhenyu & Zheng, Yixuan & Xue, Tao & He, Kebin, 2019. "Underreported coal in statistics: A survey-based solid fuel consumption and emission inventory for the rural residential sector in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1169-1182.
    18. Zhu, Xiaodong & Zhu, Zheng & Zhu, Bangzhu & Wang, Ping, 2022. "The determinants of energy choice for household cooking in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    19. Min He & Pei Liu & Linwei Ma & Chinhao Chong & Xu Li & Shizhong Song & Zheng Li & Weidou Ni, 2018. "A Systems Analysis of the Development Status and Trends of Rural Household Energy in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
    20. Tian, Zhihua & Tian, Yanfang & Shen, Liangping & Shao, Shuai, 2021. "The health effect of household cooking fuel choice in China: An urban-rural gap perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5161-:d:800888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.